지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This thesis mainly worked on three aspects. First, the characters of novels are created negatively from the origin as the subaltern of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Second, it represents the sinister presentiment about the future and the aspect of determinism reflecting the past. Third, it shows the hidden neocolonialism.
In this novel, the subaltern seems to be determined as the beings lacking morally and spiritually. Characters fall down harshly as if they were born for the misery. So it seems like that the responsibility of the ruin is on to the personal deficiency of the characters. This process of the destruction is being confirmed in the structure of the sinister presentiment about the future and the aspect of determinism reflecting the past. Finally, it is accepted as the uncorrectable fate of the subaltern. To be sure, the zenith of negative perspective is revealed in the theory of Margins of Kim SiHyung. It shows that the misery of individual extends to that of the national scope. In other word, the infelicity of an individual and a nation coexist and is legalized in the theory of Margins. His theory seems to represent the position of whole Margins obtaining consent of people like Myung hoon, In Chul, Kyung Ae. Hwang Sook Hyun. In this case, however, it can not be denied that the theory is the critical factor distributing the pessimism of the subaltern.
Through this reflection, the Margins can be revealed as the product of discourse of ruling elite. Characters of the Marginsare always programmed and produced as the miserable subaltern by the colonial discourse. The logic of Kim that the fate of outside nations is depended on the intention of the hegemonic nation prophesizes the infelicity of the subaltern hypothecated its destiny by the ruling class. Even though each character casts the earnest question about the place of the subaltern by his own voice in the absurd world, they can not be reappeared without the voice of the ruling class. If they use the voice of the elite, it can be interpreted as the result of 'transferred colonial consciousness' trying to be separated themselves from the subaltern. It is the justification of present hierarchy for them to stand in the superiority of the subaltern denying the humility of themselves. Therefore, the concept of subaltern is hard to be established in the context of transferred colonialism. It is also vulnerable as the degradation into the pre modern way. There exists the limit of Margins. The subaltern is completely forbidden the passage of growing with own subjectivity as it is recognized as the class reappeared by the ruling class. R. G. Collingwood describes modern history as the nightmare. It can be also applied to the subaltern of the Margins. They can not demand the reason of the mysterious nightmare of catastrophe in the world. As Wood mentions, they are just the mere beings that have to stand it. The power of resistance was not given to the subaltern from the beginning to seek the utopian vision in the absurd society. In this respect, the Margins should be only an anecdote of the failed subaltern without any voice from the view of the elite.
In this novel, the subaltern seems to be determined as the beings lacking morally and spiritually. Characters fall down harshly as if they were born for the misery. So it seems like that the responsibility of the ruin is on to the personal deficiency of the characters. This process of the destruction is being confirmed in the structure of the sinister presentiment about the future and the aspect of determinism reflecting the past. Finally, it is accepted as the uncorrectable fate of the subaltern. To be sure, the zenith of negative perspective is revealed in the theory of Margins of Kim SiHyung. It shows that the misery of individual extends to that of the national scope. In other word, the infelicity of an individual and a nation coexist and is legalized in the theory of Margins. His theory seems to represent the position of whole Margins obtaining consent of people like Myung hoon, In Chul, Kyung Ae. Hwang Sook Hyun. In this case, however, it can not be denied that the theory is the critical factor distributing the pessimism of the subaltern.
Through this reflection, the Margins can be revealed as the product of discourse of ruling elite. Characters of the Marginsare always programmed and produced as the miserable subaltern by the colonial discourse. The logic of Kim that the fate of outside nations is depended on the intention of the hegemonic nation prophesizes the infelicity of the subaltern hypothecated its destiny by the ruling class. Even though each character casts the earnest question about the place of the subaltern by his own voice in the absurd world, they can not be reappeared without the voice of the ruling class. If they use the voice of the elite, it can be interpreted as the result of 'transferred colonial consciousness' trying to be separated themselves from the subaltern. It is the justification of present hierarchy for them to stand in the superiority of the subaltern denying the humility of themselves. Therefore, the concept of subaltern is hard to be established in the context of transferred colonialism. It is also vulnerable as the degradation into the pre modern way. There exists the limit of Margins. The subaltern is completely forbidden the passage of growing with own subjectivity as it is recognized as the class reappeared by the ruling class. R. G. Collingwood describes modern history as the nightmare. It can be also applied to the subaltern of the Margins. They can not demand the reason of the mysterious nightmare of catastrophe in the world. As Wood mentions, they are just the mere beings that have to stand it. The power of resistance was not given to the subaltern from the beginning to seek the utopian vision in the absurd society. In this respect, the Margins should be only an anecdote of the failed subaltern without any voice from the view of the elite.
목차
1. 서론
2. 인물의 성격에 나타난 근원적 부정성
3. 불길한 예감과 과거 회상에 내재된 결정론적 태도
4. 변경론에 은폐된 신식민성
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
인도 구술사 연구의 동향과 그 전망 : 인도 서브얼턴 연구를 중심으로
인도연구
2001 .11
-
식민 전쟁과 서발턴 -호세 디아스 페르난데스(José Díaz Fernández)의 s\『진지El blocao』(1928) 를 중심으로-
지중해지역연구
2019 .01
-
이산 속의 북한여성 : 하위주체로서의 여성의 삶과 정체성의 정치
아세아연구
2013 .06
-
1960년대 사회변화와 지식인 하위주체 : 호세 마리아 아르게다스의 『모든 피』 논쟁
중남미연구
2011 .06
-
아래로부터의 지정학: “한국의 히로시마” 합천의 원폭피해자를 사례로
대한지리학회지
2020 .04
-
서발턴 이론의 관점에서 본 이주민의 문학적 재현
동북아 문화연구
2011 .12
-
마르크스주의적 ‘보편 서사’의 재천명 : 서발턴 연구그룹의 이론적 토대에 대한 도전
마르크스주의 연구
2015 .08
-
KOSPI200 선물 시장의 증거금 수준에 대한 연구
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2004 .02
-
환율의 외연(extensive margin) 및 심도(intensive margin) 효과 - 외국인 국내 입국자수 및 지출액 자료를 이용한 분석
국제금융연구
2018 .01
-
은행금융기관 金利마진(Net Interest Margin) 관리에 관한 연구
사회과학연구
1989 .12
-
수입국의 TBT가 중국 석유화학제품의 수출집약도와 수출다양도에 미치는 영향
무역연구
2020 .01
-
신용매수거래가 개별주식의 변동성, 유동성, 수익률예측력에 미치는 영향
경영경제연구
2017 .08
-
FDI and the Two Margins of International Trade: Evidence from Korea
무역연구
2016 .01
-
하위주체는 꿈꿀 수 있는가?: 사파티스타의 ‘이야기’ 정치학과 유토피아
스페인라틴아메리카연구
2019 .01
-
한국 중·소도시에 있어서의 Elite 구조분석 : 공주시 사례를 중심으로
한국동북아논총
2006 .09
-
Pattern Selection for Support Vector Regression using Expected margin
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2010 .06
-
기지촌 여성의 경험과 윤리적 재현의 불/가능성: 탈식민주의 페미니스트 역사 쓰기
여성학논집
2011 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-014952118