지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
I must refer previously that I perform methodologically the methods of historical-critical research in order to study on the Epic Dangun's. Firstly I will observe the various viewpoints of 6 Theologians (and 1 historian among of them) and secondarily I will propose my own's 'Uminterpretation' through the historical-critical methods for the Bible-exegesis. And then last I will summerize the common consideration of 6 scholars and compare the thouhgts between contents of Dangun Epic and mythical discpritions of the Old Testament.
Espescially I will consider intensively the conception of the only God and find their monotheistic God's understanding between the Dangunmyth and the Old Testament. Concretly saying agree the Heavenly God with JHWH God of the Israelites together.
About these refer several researchers already in last century.
See and investigate then in the order the viewpoints of 6 scholars in following :
1. Yun, Sung-Bum (Prof. Methodistic College) : He has said prominently the common character between the Dangun's Epic and christian Monotheism, because Dangun's Epic is able to be capacity(vessel) to put in Evangeliens. But he refered that monotheism belongs to believer's belief on own's religion. also it's character is passed for tolerance, relativity and neutrality. Prof.Yun opend the way of dialogue between a religion and an another religion. And in the relationship between Hwan-Woong(桓雄) and Woong-Nyeo(熊女) is found the Self-Negation and the heart of believe by her.
2. Ham, seok-hun(Thinker/History Educator) : He refered always sharply indivisibility between religion and politics. He used to emphasize that the thought of religion(christianity) should be accomplished in the actual world. The several asiatic Religios, Confuzianism,Taoism and Buddhism have their's God as Sang-Je and Sang-Je was changed in the Heavenly highst God. But korean Christian called historically their monotheistic God and Heavenly God(天神) without differentia. And Ham said that Heavenly God is moral and ethical.
3. Kim, In-su(Pastor) : He proclaimed that Dangun's Heavenly God is originally the Highst God of Chosun. He difined original Hwan-In as monotheistic God, and at same time is he Dangun's God, Chosunite's God and God of Human. Dangun's Heavenly God is called as JHWH-God of Israelites. Kim, In-Su seems to be acknowledged the Historicity of Dangun's Heavenly God firstly more than another.
4. Ryu, Dong-Shik(Prof. Univ. Yeon-Sei) : Free himself from the Dogmacomplexion of Christian Trinity, he describes a substance of the God's Understanding of Chosunite. It is triad Poles in Harmony. They are three viewpoints: 1) Believe in Heavenly God, 2) Union with God in Self-Negation, 3) Union with God and God's Helfer as Human in the productive culture and human's prayer for the Victory in War and Protection against enemies. He develops proper Thought for Understanding of God and man calls so-called1 "Union in the triad-poles" and "Harmony through Self-Negation".
5. Kim, Kwang-Shik(Prof. Univ. Yeon-Sei) : He has defined that the thought of Dangun-myth is a Self-understanding of Chosunites and Expression of his Self-consciousness. He has classified conceptually europian Isolization and asiatic Harmony, because the Human is essentially a Being between the uncomplete and complete. Also he could reach with sincerity to "Tao(道)". Such Self-developing concerns Union of the Li-Ki(理氣). In other Word means it 'Idea-Matter' in hellenistic thought. Anyway he insists that Human-being has his source in 'Hwan-In'. Becoming of Human has will of Self-Salvation.
6. Park, Jong-Cheon(Prof. Methodistcollege) : He emphasizes the position of feminine Woong-Nyeo more than masculine Genealogy of 'Hwan-In, Hwan-Woong and Hwan-Gum. He interprets 'Woong-Nyeo' as 'People-Class'. Especially a Union Woong-Nyeo's with 'Hwan-Woong is interpreted in Self-transcendence through the Holy-Spirit. He emphasizes individual reverence(value) of Human. Probably he concerns with social reform and democratization through movement of 'People-class'.
Reinterpretation('Uminterpretation') of Dangun-Epic :
With aspects and common concerns of the refered 6 scholars I will summerize contents of Dangun-Epic and at same time I will remove angles of the viewpoint and I utilize methodologically historical facts, ancient proper Relgion, philosophy, literature, archeology and folk-customs in prehistorical (stone-age) and bronze periods. While 6 scholars interpreted Dangunmyth religionsphilosophically and pschologically, I have dealed with the Dangun's Epic in connecting of the both sides 'culturehistorical facts and their mythical worlds'. I endowed the spiritual-theological meaning on contents of culturalhistorcal phases. They could be not contradictory concepts between the religious and the secular. Above all I reinterpret(uminterpretiere) the Dangun's Epic in the form and content differently and anew other than 6 refered scholars with 6 subjects.
Espescially I will consider intensively the conception of the only God and find their monotheistic God's understanding between the Dangunmyth and the Old Testament. Concretly saying agree the Heavenly God with JHWH God of the Israelites together.
About these refer several researchers already in last century.
See and investigate then in the order the viewpoints of 6 scholars in following :
1. Yun, Sung-Bum (Prof. Methodistic College) : He has said prominently the common character between the Dangun's Epic and christian Monotheism, because Dangun's Epic is able to be capacity(vessel) to put in Evangeliens. But he refered that monotheism belongs to believer's belief on own's religion. also it's character is passed for tolerance, relativity and neutrality. Prof.Yun opend the way of dialogue between a religion and an another religion. And in the relationship between Hwan-Woong(桓雄) and Woong-Nyeo(熊女) is found the Self-Negation and the heart of believe by her.
2. Ham, seok-hun(Thinker/History Educator) : He refered always sharply indivisibility between religion and politics. He used to emphasize that the thought of religion(christianity) should be accomplished in the actual world. The several asiatic Religios, Confuzianism,Taoism and Buddhism have their's God as Sang-Je and Sang-Je was changed in the Heavenly highst God. But korean Christian called historically their monotheistic God and Heavenly God(天神) without differentia. And Ham said that Heavenly God is moral and ethical.
3. Kim, In-su(Pastor) : He proclaimed that Dangun's Heavenly God is originally the Highst God of Chosun. He difined original Hwan-In as monotheistic God, and at same time is he Dangun's God, Chosunite's God and God of Human. Dangun's Heavenly God is called as JHWH-God of Israelites. Kim, In-Su seems to be acknowledged the Historicity of Dangun's Heavenly God firstly more than another.
4. Ryu, Dong-Shik(Prof. Univ. Yeon-Sei) : Free himself from the Dogmacomplexion of Christian Trinity, he describes a substance of the God's Understanding of Chosunite. It is triad Poles in Harmony. They are three viewpoints: 1) Believe in Heavenly God, 2) Union with God in Self-Negation, 3) Union with God and God's Helfer as Human in the productive culture and human's prayer for the Victory in War and Protection against enemies. He develops proper Thought for Understanding of God and man calls so-called1 "Union in the triad-poles" and "Harmony through Self-Negation".
5. Kim, Kwang-Shik(Prof. Univ. Yeon-Sei) : He has defined that the thought of Dangun-myth is a Self-understanding of Chosunites and Expression of his Self-consciousness. He has classified conceptually europian Isolization and asiatic Harmony, because the Human is essentially a Being between the uncomplete and complete. Also he could reach with sincerity to "Tao(道)". Such Self-developing concerns Union of the Li-Ki(理氣). In other Word means it 'Idea-Matter' in hellenistic thought. Anyway he insists that Human-being has his source in 'Hwan-In'. Becoming of Human has will of Self-Salvation.
6. Park, Jong-Cheon(Prof. Methodistcollege) : He emphasizes the position of feminine Woong-Nyeo more than masculine Genealogy of 'Hwan-In, Hwan-Woong and Hwan-Gum. He interprets 'Woong-Nyeo' as 'People-Class'. Especially a Union Woong-Nyeo's with 'Hwan-Woong is interpreted in Self-transcendence through the Holy-Spirit. He emphasizes individual reverence(value) of Human. Probably he concerns with social reform and democratization through movement of 'People-class'.
Reinterpretation('Uminterpretation') of Dangun-Epic :
With aspects and common concerns of the refered 6 scholars I will summerize contents of Dangun-Epic and at same time I will remove angles of the viewpoint and I utilize methodologically historical facts, ancient proper Relgion, philosophy, literature, archeology and folk-customs in prehistorical (stone-age) and bronze periods. While 6 scholars interpreted Dangunmyth religionsphilosophically and pschologically, I have dealed with the Dangun's Epic in connecting of the both sides 'culturehistorical facts and their mythical worlds'. I endowed the spiritual-theological meaning on contents of culturalhistorcal phases. They could be not contradictory concepts between the religious and the secular. Above all I reinterpret(uminterpretiere) the Dangun's Epic in the form and content differently and anew other than 6 refered scholars with 6 subjects.
#천상어전회의
#유일신
#천신신앙
#인간존중
#홍익인간
#계시
#성육신
#야웨
#천신(天神)
#단군계보
#예수/아담 족보
#루갈 제사장 왕과 환웅
#함무라비 왕/다윗 왕과 환검 왕
#Heavenly Council
#monotheistic God
#Heavenly God
#Self-Negation and Believe
#Union of Human within God
#弘益人間 as the Revelation
#Incarnation as God's Realization
#JHWH as Heavenly God
#Dangun's Genealogy and Jesus/Adam's Genealogy
#Priester King Hwan-Woong
#King David and Dangun
목차
Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 기독교적 해석의 연구사 고찰
Ⅲ. 단군사화(史話)의 역사비평적인 재해석
Ⅳ. 결론
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
일제시기 단군을 둘러싼 한일간의 공방
韓國史學史學報
2010 .01
-
단군학과 한국정치학 : 근대 정치사상을 중심으로
고조선단군학
2005 .12
-
최근의 단군관련 인식혼란과 과제
고조선단군학
2002 .12
-
단순신화의 단군 왕검의 고의 (古義) 연구
한국기독교신학논총
2000 .06
-
북한의 단군민족주의에 대한 검토
고조선단군학
2019 .06
-
단군 : 역사와 신화, 그리고 민족
역사비평
2016 .11
-
남과 북의 단군인식과 단군숭앙
고조선단군학
2005 .06
-
교과서에서의 ‘단군 사화(史話)’ 수용 고찰
고조선단군학
2008 .11
-
‘단군’을 소재(素材)로 한 소설 고찰 : 새로운 스토리텔링(storytelling) 모색을 중심으로
고조선단군학
2006 .12
-
'단군민족주의'의 前史
고조선단군학
2003 .06
-
한 · 몽 신화에서의 영웅의 형상과 성격 일고찰 : 단군과 게세르칸 신격의 신화적 전개 양상을 중심으로
외국문학연구
2015 .08
-
성서적 관점에서 본 단군사화 이해 : 단군사화의 신관과 통치 사상을 중심으로
고조선단군학
2017 .06
-
Who is God
Catholic Theology and Thought
2016 .06
-
신명기 역사에 나타난 ‘하나님의 사람’ 구절 연구 : 왕상 12:33~13:34
신학과 목회
2018 .11
-
고대 중동과 구약 신화의 관점에서 본 단군 신화의 해석
고조선단군학
2006 .06
-
단기 연호, 개천절 국경일, 홍익인간 교육이념 : 현대 한국에서의 단군민족주의의 제도화에 관한 연구
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2008 .12
-
북한의 단군신화 인식에 대한 연구 : 문화적 관점을 중심으로
고조선단군학
2005 .12
-
근대 단군민족주의의 계승과 단군운동 : 한말에서 임시정부 수립까지
고조선단군학
2018 .12
-
교과서에 서술된 ‘단군과 고조선’에 관한 고찰 : 문학교과서(7차 교육과정)를 중심으로
고조선단군학
2007 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-014713130