지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Ji-yong is a strong characteristic poet. His character is reflected in the poetic diction and the descriptive transformation. His command of transformative words is divided into simplicity transformation and contraction one. Simplicity transformation is the vowel changes in the standard idioms. The representative one is the mixture of neutral vowels, that is, the replacement of ‘ㅡ’ for ‘ㅣ’. Also, there are many cases that changed ‘ㅓ’ into ‘ㅏ’. The contraction transformation is that some sounds omit and changeat the same time. In the process of poetic diction transformation, vowels tend to have sunny(positive) dispositions. Some of simplicity transformative words are coincided with Chungcheung dialects. The contraction transformation has the coined-word character and, therefore, the meaning analogy is more troublesome than simplicity transformation. “haesulpi(해설피)” is the representative example. To understand his poems correctly, the comprehension of these transformative characters should be preceded.
He is the magician of language transformation that revealed excellent senses and strong characters in his command of poetic diction. He selects and polishes poetical words more elaborately than any other poets. He used non-standard language (which is not used in ordinary life, transformative words, dialects, archaic words) widely as characteristic poetic diction. Especially, he transformed words uniquely and developed them into his poetical words. With unique transformative words, he enlivened his poems. Without giving unfamiliar feeling, these gives more fresh and good flavors than familiar words to the tips of the modern people’s tongues. Thus, people have estimated him as the poet who had the excellent talents of polishing words.
He strictly prevented his emotions from exposing to the poems. To do this, he hid the narrator thoroughly behind the object description. He wrote the poems which focused on describing the object rather than expressing himself. Especially, he did good job for the transformative description. The capability of transformative description that changes presence images into absence ones was particularly prominent. Since he commanded this technique into modern poems for the first time, we can feel his character is strong.
He sticked to two unique types of poems. One is a short poetic type, the couplet form. This is based on our traditional form, the Korean Si-jo. The other is a unique prose-type. He sticked to the two frames that opposed each other. In later years of his poem writings, he persisted these two types. From his stubborn persistency of poem-types, we can feel his character. Thus we can conclude that his poetic characters are the intensive characterization of his poetic dictions, techniques, and forms.
He is the magician of language transformation that revealed excellent senses and strong characters in his command of poetic diction. He selects and polishes poetical words more elaborately than any other poets. He used non-standard language (which is not used in ordinary life, transformative words, dialects, archaic words) widely as characteristic poetic diction. Especially, he transformed words uniquely and developed them into his poetical words. With unique transformative words, he enlivened his poems. Without giving unfamiliar feeling, these gives more fresh and good flavors than familiar words to the tips of the modern people’s tongues. Thus, people have estimated him as the poet who had the excellent talents of polishing words.
He strictly prevented his emotions from exposing to the poems. To do this, he hid the narrator thoroughly behind the object description. He wrote the poems which focused on describing the object rather than expressing himself. Especially, he did good job for the transformative description. The capability of transformative description that changes presence images into absence ones was particularly prominent. Since he commanded this technique into modern poems for the first time, we can feel his character is strong.
He sticked to two unique types of poems. One is a short poetic type, the couplet form. This is based on our traditional form, the Korean Si-jo. The other is a unique prose-type. He sticked to the two frames that opposed each other. In later years of his poem writings, he persisted these two types. From his stubborn persistency of poem-types, we can feel his character. Thus we can conclude that his poetic characters are the intensive characterization of his poetic dictions, techniques, and forms.
목차
1. 한국 현대시사의 의미망 속에서
2. 비표준어의 활용과 그 특징
3. 난해한 시어의 해석
4. 완미한 변형 묘사의 시 「바다 2」
5. 강한 개성과 시의 특성
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
정지용 시의 운율 의식
한국시학연구
2002 .11
-
'풍장1'의 언어기호론적 해석
우리말글
2005 .12
-
鄭芝溶의 초기시에 나타난 詩意識과 形象性 硏究 : 초기시를 중심으로
어문론집
2003 .12
-
시 창작교육 방향의 탐색
문학교육학
2008 .01
-
Poems
Korea Journal
1979 .08
-
李白＜贈＞詩 譯解 및 考察(7) — 제30수에서 제31수까지
중국어문논총
2019 .01
-
李白 ＜贈＞詩 譯解 및 考察(8) — 제32수에서 제34수까지
중국어문논총
2020 .01
-
韓國 現代詩의 詩語와 詩意識 硏究
한국시학연구
2002 .05
-
시적 형상화 기법에 따른 시 창작 교육 시론(試論)
한국시학연구
2010 .04
-
오규원의 동시와 시론의 상관성 연구
한국시학연구
2007 .08
-
정지용의 시어 분석
국제언어문학
2003 .12
-
90년대 한국 현대시의 탈정치성과 신서정성 - 87민주화운동 이후의 특징을 중심으로 -
한국문학논총
2008 .01
-
백석 시어 연구의 기념비적 업적
한국시학연구
2015 .12
-
Exceptional Poems on Non-Poetic Themes
Korea Journal
1973 .03
-
일제강점기 신문 독자투고시의 시어 사용 양상 : 통계적 키워드와 공기어 네트워크 분석을 중심으로
우리문학연구
2018 .04
-
김수영 시의 관념성
국어국문학
2004 .09
-
김혜순 시의 시적 공간 : '서울'을 중심으로
국어문학
2009 .08
-
우리 시어의 근대성과 근대적 자각 : 김소월과 정지용의 시어를 중심으로
한국학연구
2003 .11
-
우리말 (외 1수)
중국조선어문
2018 .11
-
현대시인의 문체적 지문을 찾아서
국어국문학
2006 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-811-016452717