지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Yang-wu(洋務) movement for China's self-strengthening(自强) through learning the Western methods, was consistently connected with the maritime defense(海防) system from beginning to end. In other words, the object of the self-strengthening enterprises, i.e., the governmental arsenals and shipyards, various civil companies under government supervise, including mines and industries or shipping-business, modern diplomacy, was restricted by the maritime defense system, and couldn't go beyond it. The maritime defense meant China's efforts to defend the traditional system of imperial rule and the sphere of external influence against the maritime Powers. As Yang-wu movement was more advanced in 1870s, the patriotic ideas to guard the rights of sovereign state increasingly grew, combined with the traditional Sino-centric ideology of great unified(大一統) empire.
The second step of Yang-wu movement in 1870s, under Li Hong-zhang's leadership, fulfilled considerable development, according to being acquainted with the unceasing renovation of Western engineering and the worldwide competition among the Western Powers. This development led Yang-wu officials into the ideological devision between Us Huai army(淮軍) faction and Zuo Zong-tang's(左宗棠) Xiang army(湘君) faction, which resulted in the differentiation of direction guiding the defense strategy and Yang-wu reform. At the 1874 controversy between Zuo's land defense and Li's maritime defense, the officials of Li group were relatively more progressive than Zuo group, but also restricted by the passive defense strategy. Therefore, it's natural that Li couldn't persuade his opposers, i.e., relatively conservative Yang-wu officials and anti-foreign Qing-liu(淸流) faction.
Having more shrewd and practical views about the irresistible force of competitive Western civilization, Li Hong-zhang opposed the optimistic outlook that China could overtake Western Powers in near future through the short-term self-strengthening enterprises. This perspective in 1870s that was shared by early Yang-wu offial's, as Zeng Guo-fan(曾國藩) and Zuo himself in 1860s. Li's pessimistic outlook about competitive world, like the warring ststes(戰國) in ancient Chinese history, was reflected in his foreign policies that China gave up her rivalry with the Western Powers and only concentrated her defensive efforts on Japan, the rising small country. Li introduced commercial capital into the Yang-wu enterprises, and understood the importance of building the diversified, and professionalized vessels, naval or mercantile. But he chose to purchase naval warships from the Great Britain or Germany than to attempt to make the warships for himself for China's permanent independency.
In 1874 controversy, Li Hong-zhang proposed the institutional reform(變法), not total but partial. He was willing to reform civil service examination(科擧) system to nourish Yang-wu talents and concentrate official administration beyond provincial division. Nevertheless, these suggestions of institutional reform were all included within the sphere of maritime defense. In Yang-wu period, China's administration was separated into two different parts, traditional and Yang-wu. And this dual organization under maritime defense system was a great obstacle for successful reform, that could be fulfilled through the full reform of educational and official system. When the reformers take part in the offensive worldwide rivalry in the high seas together with western Powers, the formation of modern nation-state will become their imminent aim. Without the full institutional reform for this aim, Li continued to be defensive and lenient in front of foreign challenges. However, it's impressable that the modern system of diplomacy appeared by Li group in 1870s as the result of competitive world view, even if it still remained incipient in the development of modem nationalism.
The second step of Yang-wu movement in 1870s, under Li Hong-zhang's leadership, fulfilled considerable development, according to being acquainted with the unceasing renovation of Western engineering and the worldwide competition among the Western Powers. This development led Yang-wu officials into the ideological devision between Us Huai army(淮軍) faction and Zuo Zong-tang's(左宗棠) Xiang army(湘君) faction, which resulted in the differentiation of direction guiding the defense strategy and Yang-wu reform. At the 1874 controversy between Zuo's land defense and Li's maritime defense, the officials of Li group were relatively more progressive than Zuo group, but also restricted by the passive defense strategy. Therefore, it's natural that Li couldn't persuade his opposers, i.e., relatively conservative Yang-wu officials and anti-foreign Qing-liu(淸流) faction.
Having more shrewd and practical views about the irresistible force of competitive Western civilization, Li Hong-zhang opposed the optimistic outlook that China could overtake Western Powers in near future through the short-term self-strengthening enterprises. This perspective in 1870s that was shared by early Yang-wu offial's, as Zeng Guo-fan(曾國藩) and Zuo himself in 1860s. Li's pessimistic outlook about competitive world, like the warring ststes(戰國) in ancient Chinese history, was reflected in his foreign policies that China gave up her rivalry with the Western Powers and only concentrated her defensive efforts on Japan, the rising small country. Li introduced commercial capital into the Yang-wu enterprises, and understood the importance of building the diversified, and professionalized vessels, naval or mercantile. But he chose to purchase naval warships from the Great Britain or Germany than to attempt to make the warships for himself for China's permanent independency.
In 1874 controversy, Li Hong-zhang proposed the institutional reform(變法), not total but partial. He was willing to reform civil service examination(科擧) system to nourish Yang-wu talents and concentrate official administration beyond provincial division. Nevertheless, these suggestions of institutional reform were all included within the sphere of maritime defense. In Yang-wu period, China's administration was separated into two different parts, traditional and Yang-wu. And this dual organization under maritime defense system was a great obstacle for successful reform, that could be fulfilled through the full reform of educational and official system. When the reformers take part in the offensive worldwide rivalry in the high seas together with western Powers, the formation of modern nation-state will become their imminent aim. Without the full institutional reform for this aim, Li continued to be defensive and lenient in front of foreign challenges. However, it's impressable that the modern system of diplomacy appeared by Li group in 1870s as the result of competitive world view, even if it still remained incipient in the development of modem nationalism.
#해방
#양무
#육방
#변법
#대일통제국
#국체
#국권
#근대외교
#기술혁신
#국가경쟁
#海防
#洋務
#陸防
#變法
#大一統帝國
#國體
#國權
#近代外交
#技術革新
#國家競爭
#maritime defense
#Yang-wu
#land defense
#institutional reform
#great unified empire
#imperial government system
#national sovereignty
#mordern diplomacy
#renovation of engineering
#international competition
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 海防ㆍ洋務의 발전과 洋務派의 分化
Ⅲ. 1870년대 李鴻章의 海防과 양무운동
Ⅳ. 李鴻章의 세계인식과 近代 外交의 형성
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
무자고
동아문화
1968 .07
-
中國陰陽五行法律思想源流
중국사연구
2016 .01
-
중국의 이탁오 연구 동향과 그 사상사적 영향
오늘의 동양사상
2007 .04
-
이탁오와 조선유학
양명학
2008 .12
-
『淸史稿』 편찬사업과 대외인식
역사와 세계
2018 .12
-
[書評]助力國際學者認識近代中國的力作 -評侯傑教授等著<<變法圖強: 近代的挑戰與革新>>
중국사연구
2019 .01
-
Administration of Land Reform in Korea, 1949-52
Korea Journal
1984 .10
-
이탁오의 유적ㆍ유물을 찾아
오늘의 동양사상
2007 .04
-
洋務運動期 民族意識 發展의 一端 : 同治末ㆍ光緒初의 國權과 華僑問題 認識을 중심으로
동양사학연구
2003 .12
-
왕양명 심즉리설을 어떻게 이해할 것인가?
동양철학
2019 .01
-
试论杨朱其人及其籍贯生平
중국어문학
2019 .01
-
초기 洋務論의 형성과 上海지역
중국근현대사연구
2002 .12
-
전국 시대 말엽에서 한나라 초기 오음(五音)과 십이율(十二律)의 음악 외적 용례에 관한 고찰
철학사상
2014 .08
-
중국 新人文主義 지도자 吳宓의 낭만적 성향 연구
외국학연구
2014 .01
-
<<漢書ㆍ五行志>>를 통해 본 班固의 災異觀
중국사연구
2020 .01
-
牟安世著 洋務運動, 1956年刊, 223 pp
동양사학연구
1967 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-016409567