지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The debate over the authenticity of Empress Myeongseong(1851~1895)'s portrait, which has been dragging on without any clear conclusion since the 1990's, is not simply an issue of discovering what she originally looked like. Deeply seated beneath these debates are intense feelings of nationalism and a consciousness of having been victimized that call for a recovery of the last Empress of the Joseon Dynasty, whose assassination by Japan had previously been kept a dark secret. However, in order for the debate on its authenticity to become productive, the mechanism of how portrait photographs were made during the era when her image was made, namely the 1890's, needs to be examined. The issue at hand is not which photograph is real, but rather, why the problem of authenticity of the Empress's portrait has arisen, and how the model image of the Empress kept being reproduced regardless of whether it was truly her or not. This paper aims to investigate how the politics of Empress Myeongseong's representation was applied to the formation process of the modern period's gender order through the images of the Empress produced in the visual medium from the 1890's to the present.
Today, there is no photograph of Empress Myeongseong which has been authenticated. The reality of one photograph taken sometime between the mid 1890's and the Russo-Japanese War being reproduced through such things as lithographs, photograph printing, postcards, and photograph albums and then presented as the Empress, or a court lady of Joseon, reveals the commercialization of Joseon photographs and the male-centric representation custom. In particular, the royal photographs that focused on the king and the prince show that, although Empress Myeongseong had actively taken part in politics, she could not overcome the custom of portrait representation that focused on the tradition of the paternal lineage.
Empress Myeongseong was viewed as both a 'wicked woman who ultimately destroyed the country'by pushing herself into the public sphere called politics, and as the 'mother of the nation who symbolized her people's suffering.'These two incompatible images were formed by Japan and Joseon around the time of her assassination in 1895. The image of the Empress as a wicked woman who destroyed her country, drawn in the popular wood print Nishikie(錦繪) during the Meji period, was intimately connected to the gender-conscious public discourse of the Japan of the Meji period. On the other hand, during the time of the Japanese occupation and after Korea's liberation, the process of rebirth of her image from that of a dangerous woman to that of a symbol of her people's suffering, and subsequent transformation into a Korean Joan of Arc after the 1990's, is closely tied not only to a certain viewpoint of Japanese colonial history but also to a family discourse within Korea that has internalized a strong national ideology. In this, her image can be considered as an example or model of an image of women created through concealment, exclusion, and imagination in the process of modern gender order acquisition.
Today, there is no photograph of Empress Myeongseong which has been authenticated. The reality of one photograph taken sometime between the mid 1890's and the Russo-Japanese War being reproduced through such things as lithographs, photograph printing, postcards, and photograph albums and then presented as the Empress, or a court lady of Joseon, reveals the commercialization of Joseon photographs and the male-centric representation custom. In particular, the royal photographs that focused on the king and the prince show that, although Empress Myeongseong had actively taken part in politics, she could not overcome the custom of portrait representation that focused on the tradition of the paternal lineage.
Empress Myeongseong was viewed as both a 'wicked woman who ultimately destroyed the country'by pushing herself into the public sphere called politics, and as the 'mother of the nation who symbolized her people's suffering.'These two incompatible images were formed by Japan and Joseon around the time of her assassination in 1895. The image of the Empress as a wicked woman who destroyed her country, drawn in the popular wood print Nishikie(錦繪) during the Meji period, was intimately connected to the gender-conscious public discourse of the Japan of the Meji period. On the other hand, during the time of the Japanese occupation and after Korea's liberation, the process of rebirth of her image from that of a dangerous woman to that of a symbol of her people's suffering, and subsequent transformation into a Korean Joan of Arc after the 1990's, is closely tied not only to a certain viewpoint of Japanese colonial history but also to a family discourse within Korea that has internalized a strong national ideology. In this, her image can be considered as an example or model of an image of women created through concealment, exclusion, and imagination in the process of modern gender order acquisition.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 1890년대 사진적 재현과 유포의 방식들
Ⅲ. 을미사변 전후 만들어진 명성황후의 표상들
Ⅳ. 위험한 여성에서 다시 國母로 부활하기까지
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
이화여자대학교박물관 소장 〈명성황후발인반차도〉 연구
미술사논단
2012 .12
-
사진의 변질과 보존에 관한 연구
AURA
2014 .01
-
Self Portrait
International Invitation Exhibition of Color Works
2014 .11
-
조선시대 초상화의 圖像과 心像 : 조선 중후기 선비 초상화의 修己的 의미를 통해서 본 再現的 圖像의 實存的 의미와 기능에 대한 성찰
미술사학
2001 .08
-
화가와 초상화
미술사연구
2006 .12
-
17세기 中國의 肖像畵 合作
미술사연구
2014 .12
-
시니어를 위한 포트레이트(Portrait) 사진교육 프로그램에 대한 연구 -‘인생사진(영정사진) 프로젝트’를 중심으로 -
AURA
2019 .01
-
컬러이미지에서 흑백전환의 방법에 따른 농도재현에 관한 연구
AURA
2008 .01
-
朝鮮 後期 中國 肖像畵의 流入과 韓國的 變用 : 赴京使臣 持來本을 중심으로
미술사논단
2002 .09
-
색의 도전, 요키히, 양귀비 황후 (켄지 미조구치, 1955) - 색상과 영화 -
예술과 미디어
2016 .01
-
사진의 세 가지 경로와 알레고리 －포스트모더니즘 시대의 관점으로－
AURA
2012 .01
-
털과 눈 : 조선시대 초상화의 祭儀的 命題와 造形的 課題
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2005 .12
-
사진의 지각과 일상의 지각의 차이
영화연구
2005 .08
-
사진 속에 재현된 대한제국 황제의 표상 : 고종의 초상사진을 중심으로
한국근현대미술사학
2006 .08
-
김진갑의 〈나전침대〉 - 사용자와 제작경위
미술사연구
2019 .06
-
노출량에 따른 디지털사진과 은염사진의 화질 비교
AURA
2007 .01
-
거울과 사진, 한국 근대초상화의 닮음과 진실
인물미술사학
2011 .12
-
시각 문화로서의 한국 전쟁 사진
한국근현대미술사학
2010 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-650-016264165