메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
담화·인지언어학회 담화와인지 담화와인지 제12권 제3호
발행연도
2005.12
수록면
57 - 73 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It has been widely accepted that verbs like spray and load which participate in the locative alternation show a holistic effect when a Ground object is expressed as direct object (e.g., John loaded the wagon with apples). Contrary to most claims in the literature, Jackendoff (1996) points out that Ground syntax shows only a preference for the covered/filled interpretation, but that it does not force this holistic effect. Based on an experimental study, in this paper I investigated whether the holism effect associated with Ground syntax could be perceptually obligatory. Ten English-speaking children and ten adult speakers of English were tested with video-taped events which contain seven English Alternating verbs. The results of the present study show that overall, adults used more Ground syntax when the Ground object was completely affected, than when it was only partially affected by the action However, the holism effect found in this study was not strong enough to make speakers choose Ground syntax. In addition, English-speaking children showed a strong Figure frame bias with Alternating verbs and they did not show the holistic effect at all. Therefore, I suggest that unlike the general claim in the literature, this holistic effect with Ground syntax might not be perceptually obligatory.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background
3. Experiment
4. Discussion and Conclusions
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-701-016216394