지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper argues that Korean sentence-formation should be based upon the principle of constituent-addition, rather than that of constituent-insertion. This claim derives from the fact that many Korean utterance-sentences (in particular, conversational data) show absence of seemingly argument-NPs. The traditional way of interpreting this phenomenon is ellipsis, which means that the obligatory arguments are elided on structural or pragmatic-contextual reasons. On the basis of several pieces of evidence, in Korean, actants that are required for the lexical definition of a lexeme (a verb) are argued in the paper to be non-obligatory; they are entities that are added when necessary. In other words, they are actualized to the sentence not by the grammar rule, but by the speaker’s communicative need or intention. The syntactic principle for the sentence-formation is termed “framed syntax” for English or Russian, and contrastingly “agglutinative syntax” for Korean.
목차
1. 들어가기
2. 성분의 필수성과 생략
3. 한국어 통사론에서의 필수성 문제
4. ‘교착’ 통사론 : 몇 가지 함의
5. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-700-002732452