지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In order to understand ‘regional rule’ during the colonial rule, there is a necessity to approach this issue by categorizing and examining three forms of rule. The first is a ‘bureaucratic rule’ based on the premise of rational rule. The Governor General in Korea tried to achieve this form of rule through its ruling administration. This includes rule through repressive state organs such the army, and police, etc. Second is hegemonic rule. This is premised on the existence of a middle layer of colonial rule or the existence of internal colonialism. The third form is rule through ‘village politics.’ Regional politics takes shape within the space of contestation between bureaucratic rule and hegemonic rule.
I view the bureaucratic rule system established around the provinces and counties to be the center of colonial regional rule. In addition, I also believe in the existence of the hegemonic rule of the ‘intermediary ruling class’ that forms at the counties-districts-villages and either conflicts or complements the bureaucratic rule at the higher levels. Ji Su-Gol as well, through the concept of bureaucraticlanded rule system, posits the possibility of the two forms of rule, bureacratic rule and hegemonic rule. However, Ji Su-Gol does not acknowledge the hegemonic rule characteristics that is contained in landed rule. Furthermore, he does not acknowledge the establishment of the bureaucratic rule system. Here, the irony contained in Ji Su-Gol’s bureaucratic-landed rule system can be understood.
To rectify the abuse that is contained in the binary awareness of colonialism, there is a need to reconsider the ‘gray zone of colonial consciousness.’ For this purpose, there is a need to expand and deepen research into colonial political history and the history of everyday life. There is a need to expand the meaning of ‘political’ within the realm of political history and to introduce the concept of ‘collaboration.’ Furthermore, there must be an application of the concept of ‘colonial public sphere’ to deepen the concept of the history of the everyday and political history. The use of the concept of ‘public sphere’ here does not mean an actual public sphere, but instead it has the characteristic of a metaphor used to criticize the colonial state (or the nation state).
I view the bureaucratic rule system established around the provinces and counties to be the center of colonial regional rule. In addition, I also believe in the existence of the hegemonic rule of the ‘intermediary ruling class’ that forms at the counties-districts-villages and either conflicts or complements the bureaucratic rule at the higher levels. Ji Su-Gol as well, through the concept of bureaucraticlanded rule system, posits the possibility of the two forms of rule, bureacratic rule and hegemonic rule. However, Ji Su-Gol does not acknowledge the hegemonic rule characteristics that is contained in landed rule. Furthermore, he does not acknowledge the establishment of the bureaucratic rule system. Here, the irony contained in Ji Su-Gol’s bureaucratic-landed rule system can be understood.
To rectify the abuse that is contained in the binary awareness of colonialism, there is a need to reconsider the ‘gray zone of colonial consciousness.’ For this purpose, there is a need to expand and deepen research into colonial political history and the history of everyday life. There is a need to expand the meaning of ‘political’ within the realm of political history and to introduce the concept of ‘collaboration.’ Furthermore, there must be an application of the concept of ‘colonial public sphere’ to deepen the concept of the history of the everyday and political history. The use of the concept of ‘public sphere’ here does not mean an actual public sphere, but instead it has the characteristic of a metaphor used to criticize the colonial state (or the nation state).
목차
머리말 - ‘관료-유지지배체제’와 학문의 장
1. 식민지기 지방지배의 범주 설정 문제
2. ‘관료-유지 지배체제’인가, ‘관료지배체제’인가?
3. 면=촌락의 3국면 구조와 촌락지배
4. ‘식민지 인식의 회색지대’를 위한 변증
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
On the Variable Rules
신영어영문학
1983 .12
-
Japanese Rule and Colonial Dual Society in Korea
Korea Journal
2010 .12
-
The Rule of Law and the Rule of Virtue : On the Necessity for Their Mutual Integration
Korea Journal
2003 .03
-
The Word Stress Rules in Korean
Korea Journal
1987 .02
-
근대한국어의 구개음화
언어학
2018 .04
-
중국인 학습자의 한국어 음운규칙 습득 연구
이중언어학
2011 .01
-
Korean Investment Under Japanese Rule
Korea Journal
1977 .03
-
A Critical Review of Spelling-based English Stress Rules
영어학
2015 .12
-
Korean Buddhist Journals during Early Japanese Colonial Rule
Korea Journal
1990 .01
-
규칙 따르기의 성격
대동철학
2004 .01
-
Korean Poetry under Japanese Rule
Korea Journal
1973 .09
-
Nationalism and Korean Businessmen Under Japanese Colonial Rule
Korea Journal
1977 .01
-
[한국 근대Ⅱ] 새로운 역사인식과 방법론의 모색 : 일제 식민지 시기 연구의 현황과 전망
역사학보
2014 .09
-
King Sejong’'s Confucian Rule by Law : Focusing on the relationship between law and rule by benevolence
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2006 .09
-
‘ㅜ/ㅗ+ㅓ/ㅏ’의 음운론적 변화와 영남방언의 위상
어문학
2006 .06
-
Rule Ordering in Korean Phonology
언어
1976 .06
-
English Stress : Rules or Constraints?
언어
2006 .03
-
The Rule of Law and Forms of Power : Theorizingthe Social Foundations of the Rule of Law in Korea
Korea Journal
2009 .12
-
Rule Ordering and Optimality Theory
음성음운형태론연구
1997 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
[특집/근대와 식민주의 인식의 전복을 위하여]식민지 인식의 '회색 지대': 일제하 '공공성'과 규율 권력
윤해동
당대비평
2000
.12
식민지 근대 연구의 새로운 발견적 도구로서 ‘식민지 공공성’ : 윤해동ㆍ황병주 엮음, 『식민지 공공성: 실체와 은유의 거리』(책과함께, 2010)
김백영
경제와사회
2011
.09
한국에서의 식민지 연구와 ‘탈식민주의’
윤해동
코기토
2003
.12
왜 식민지 공공성인가
윤해동
내일을 여는 역사
2008
.03
일제하의 지방통치 시스템과 군 단위 ‘관료-유지 지배체제’ : 윤해동 저, 『지배와 자치』(역사비평사, 2006)에 대한 논평
지수걸
역사와현실
2007
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-016210332