지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
“Administrative entity (haengjeong-juche)” is a basic concept widely used in administrative law. It is indispensable not only to understand who performs the duty of public administration but also to establish the concept of public administration itself and, under the dual system of public and private law, to set up a standard to distinguish the objects of administrative litigation from those of civil litigation. Thus understanding what an administrative body is and what are comprised therein is very important both to administrative jurisprudence and practice.
An administrative entity is a public entity which possesses administrative power in its own name, exercises it through its organs and to which the rights and duties arising from exercise of administrative power belongs. Administrative entities are classified into the state and other public bodies. Among them, the term "public body (gonggong-danche)" is generally used to include local governments and other incorporated public bodies, such as public associations (gonggong-johap), public corporations(yeongjomul-beobin) and public foundations (gong-jaedan). Such conceptualization, however, has some logical defects and practical problems. First, it is inappropriate to put into a single category local governments with comprehensive administrative power and other public bodies which have only specific, restricted power. Moreover, some of the bodies designated as public bodies are not suitable to called so.
What is far more important is that some of the public bodies, especially those called public associations, cast some doubt concerning the concept and nature of administrative entities. What is the difference between such professional organizations as Bar Associations and Medical Associations designated as public associations on the one hand and occupational or trade organizations which are considered just as private associations on the other hand? What are their characteristics that make them to be called public bodies?
This article calls for more thoughtful examination into these questions and suggests that the title of administrative entity or public body should be given only to those bodies that are invested with the function of performing public interest as their duty.
An administrative entity is a public entity which possesses administrative power in its own name, exercises it through its organs and to which the rights and duties arising from exercise of administrative power belongs. Administrative entities are classified into the state and other public bodies. Among them, the term "public body (gonggong-danche)" is generally used to include local governments and other incorporated public bodies, such as public associations (gonggong-johap), public corporations(yeongjomul-beobin) and public foundations (gong-jaedan). Such conceptualization, however, has some logical defects and practical problems. First, it is inappropriate to put into a single category local governments with comprehensive administrative power and other public bodies which have only specific, restricted power. Moreover, some of the bodies designated as public bodies are not suitable to called so.
What is far more important is that some of the public bodies, especially those called public associations, cast some doubt concerning the concept and nature of administrative entities. What is the difference between such professional organizations as Bar Associations and Medical Associations designated as public associations on the one hand and occupational or trade organizations which are considered just as private associations on the other hand? What are their characteristics that make them to be called public bodies?
This article calls for more thoughtful examination into these questions and suggests that the title of administrative entity or public body should be given only to those bodies that are invested with the function of performing public interest as their duty.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 行政主體의 개념과 종류
Ⅲ. 公共團體의 개념과 범위
Ⅳ. 公共團體의 종류별 개념과 行政主體性
Ⅴ. 結論
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
행정법학의 개념과그 외연(外延) : 제도중심의 공법학방법론을 위한 시론(試論)
행정법연구
2008 .08
-
國際聯合行政上의 諸問題
국제법학회논총
1960 .04
-
공공정책과 행정법에서의 법규범과의 관계에 관한 연구
한국사회와 행정연구
2002 .08
-
참여와 교섭에 의한 행정과정과 행정분쟁의 해결
행정법연구
2007 .08
-
한국의 행정계획
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2007 .12
-
글로벌 시대의 公益論
행정법연구
2007 .12
-
일본 공기업법의 발전과 현황
법과기업연구
2013 .06
-
中国2014年《行政诉讼法》修正案的主要内容及未来发展
동북아법연구
2015 .01
-
행정지도와 법률유보 및 구제에 관한 이론적 검토
한양법학
2011 .08
-
동아시아 행정심판제도 비교연구
행정법연구
2008 .08
-
중국법상 行政審判機關의 終局裁決權과 그에 대한 評價
법학연구
2005 .12
-
Exploring Public Relations in Korea : Implications for the Public Relations Body of Knowledge
한국언론학보
2001 .12
-
행정의 행위형식으로서의‘행정계획’개념에 대한 검토－헌법재판소 2000. 6. 1. 선고, 99헌마538등 결정,대법원 1982. 3. 9. 선고, 80누105 판결 및 대법원 2002.10. 11. 선고, 2000두8226 판결에 대한 평석－
일감법학
2013 .01
-
中国经济新常态下的环境公益诉讼之诉讼对象评析
국제거래와 법
2019 .07
-
The foundations of administrative Law : From the French concept of service public to Herrschaft and German administrative law
강원법학
2014 .06
-
중국행정소송에서 검찰기관(检察机关)의 소제기에 관한 연구
동북아법연구
2013 .01
-
환경문제에 대한 행정법적 대응과 행정구제
한림법학 FORUM
2006 .11
-
행정계획론 소고
법학연구
2007 .06
-
공공기관 분류체계 및 지배구조 개선방안
한국지방재정논집
2011 .12
-
프랑스, 미국에서의 행정행위 개념에 대한 소고
행정법연구
2007 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-362-016109264