지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper intends to reflect some of the important results observed recently in Korean linguistics and some of the deep-rooted misconceptions still working in the studies of the Korean language, About five main issues are treated like the following.
One of the tantalizing issues in the studies of Silla Hyangga (鄕歌) is the decoding and reading of the phrase written as myol ‘?乙’ in Seodongyo(薯童謠), which was decoded as *aihAl ‘egg-ul(accusative marker)’ by Kim (1990) who confessed that the meaning was not obvious in contexts. Though various hypotheses have been put forth on this problem, this paper points out that the *al ‘egg’ should be understand to refer to the human naked body.
The 2nd issue is concerned with the word gos (곳) that appears within the phrase joronggos nurogi maewa(조롱곳누로기매와) in Cheongsanbyeolgok (靑山別曲). While Yang (1947) saw it as having the meaning of ‘flower’, Kim (2000a) understands it as having the meaning of ‘fragrance’, Accepting the ‘fragrance’ approach, this paper proposes small change of the context: the gos is not related with jorong ‘a bottle gourd’, but with run ‘malted rice wine’, to mean that the malted rice wine is fragrant.
The 3rd issue is related with the decoding of the word gongmok (功木) or ungseom (熊閃) that appears in Samguksagi (三國史記). Beckwith (2004) decodes ungsom (熊閃) as denoting the bear(ung 熊) and evading (seom 閃), so ungseom (熊閃) is interpreted as the event of ‘evading the bear’ However, this is a sort of typical misconception about the Goguryeo language, because it is clear that the notation of ungseom (熊閃) exactly transcribed the word gom ‘bear’ in Goguryeo language, in which seom (閃) indicates the final sound 一m of the word gom ‘bear’.
The 4th issue is the problem of categorization of the predicate ida ‘to be’ which is commonly called ‘copula’ in Korean Grammar. School Grammar treats it as a sort of predicative case. However this is simply false, because the predicate ida ‘to be’ shows inflections: the stem i- ‘to be’ takes all kinds of verbal endings just like any other predicates. The predicate -i ‘to be’ is to be characterized as adjective, because its inflection coincides with adjectives in Korean.
The 5th issue is related with the basic fallacy hidden in the ideology of generative grammar. Generative grammarian claims in public that their grammar can generates a sentence of natural language without any recourse to what their grammar purposes to generate. However, this is a total fallacy, because the target sentence should be given before the generative process begins to work. If the target sentence is not given as such from the first, the generative process cannot even move a step towards the final result, due to the total ignorance about which way to go.
Humanistic imagination is needed for one step advance from the steep peak of the state of art, and for one step escape from the umbrella of false ideology and wrong protectionism.
One of the tantalizing issues in the studies of Silla Hyangga (鄕歌) is the decoding and reading of the phrase written as myol ‘?乙’ in Seodongyo(薯童謠), which was decoded as *aihAl ‘egg-ul(accusative marker)’ by Kim (1990) who confessed that the meaning was not obvious in contexts. Though various hypotheses have been put forth on this problem, this paper points out that the *al ‘egg’ should be understand to refer to the human naked body.
The 2nd issue is concerned with the word gos (곳) that appears within the phrase joronggos nurogi maewa(조롱곳누로기매와) in Cheongsanbyeolgok (靑山別曲). While Yang (1947) saw it as having the meaning of ‘flower’, Kim (2000a) understands it as having the meaning of ‘fragrance’, Accepting the ‘fragrance’ approach, this paper proposes small change of the context: the gos is not related with jorong ‘a bottle gourd’, but with run ‘malted rice wine’, to mean that the malted rice wine is fragrant.
The 3rd issue is related with the decoding of the word gongmok (功木) or ungseom (熊閃) that appears in Samguksagi (三國史記). Beckwith (2004) decodes ungsom (熊閃) as denoting the bear(ung 熊) and evading (seom 閃), so ungseom (熊閃) is interpreted as the event of ‘evading the bear’ However, this is a sort of typical misconception about the Goguryeo language, because it is clear that the notation of ungseom (熊閃) exactly transcribed the word gom ‘bear’ in Goguryeo language, in which seom (閃) indicates the final sound 一m of the word gom ‘bear’.
The 4th issue is the problem of categorization of the predicate ida ‘to be’ which is commonly called ‘copula’ in Korean Grammar. School Grammar treats it as a sort of predicative case. However this is simply false, because the predicate ida ‘to be’ shows inflections: the stem i- ‘to be’ takes all kinds of verbal endings just like any other predicates. The predicate -i ‘to be’ is to be characterized as adjective, because its inflection coincides with adjectives in Korean.
The 5th issue is related with the basic fallacy hidden in the ideology of generative grammar. Generative grammarian claims in public that their grammar can generates a sentence of natural language without any recourse to what their grammar purposes to generate. However, this is a total fallacy, because the target sentence should be given before the generative process begins to work. If the target sentence is not given as such from the first, the generative process cannot even move a step towards the final result, due to the total ignorance about which way to go.
Humanistic imagination is needed for one step advance from the steep peak of the state of art, and for one step escape from the umbrella of false ideology and wrong protectionism.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 벼랑 끝에서 한 걸음
3. 우산과 굴레에서 한 걸음
4. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (49)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
생성문법과 학교문법의 문장유형 분석방식 비교
신영어영문학
2005 .08
-
동물 명칭 관련 지명의 새로운 인식 : 말[馬]-, 곰[熊]-, 용(龍)-계 지명을 중심으로
어문학
2006 .06
-
How Conservative Should School Grammar Be?
영어영문학연구
2009 .01
-
The Predicate mean in Discourse and Grammar
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2002 .12
-
A Grammar of "Coming"
언어
1978 .06
-
새로운 한국어 표준 문법에 대한 탐색- 『한국어 표준 문법』(2018)을 중심으로 -
언어사실과 관점
2019 .01
-
표준 국어 문법 개발의 의의와 활용
언어와 정보사회
2018 .01
-
예스퍼슨의 Analytic Syntax: 생성문법과의 비교분석
영어학연구
2004 .01
-
한국어 문법 교육에서 ‘이다’와 관련한 몇 가지 문제: 학습자를 위한 문법 기술의 관점에서
언어와 정보사회
2018 .01
-
교사 문법과 학습자 문법의 비교 연구
한말연구
2018 .01
-
표준 국어 문법 통사론 분야의 특징과 활용
언어와 정보사회
2018 .01
-
국어 교육의 학교문법과 한국어 교육의 표준문법
어문론집
2010 .03
-
대학에서의 영문법 교육
영어학
2002 .12
-
외래 문법과 문법 교육
동서인문학
2016 .12
-
유길준의 大韓文典과 문법관 일고찰
언어사실과 관점
2016 .01
-
표준 국어 문법 형태론 분야의 특징과 활용
언어와 정보사회
2018 .01
-
문법 교과서의 내용 체계상 문제점과 개선 방안
국어국문학
2006 .05
-
생성통사이론의 변천과 발전 전망
한국어학
2018 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-015947034