메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국현대영미드라마학회 현대영미드라마 현대영미드라마 제20권 제2호
발행연도
2007.8
수록면
27 - 51 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In terms of competing notions of national identity, the new right was far more vigorous and successful throughout the 1970s. A sense of capitalist crisis was re-constructed through racist discourses, and class struggle and working-class consciousness were diluted with racism’s far-reaching capacity to link discourses of patriotism, imperialism, nationalism and Englishness. This sense of national crisis was captured most acutely in David Edgar’s 1976 play, Destiny, whose battle-line is race in the sense that it is seen as a more significant and dangerous divide in British society than class.
In contrast with the traditional agip-prop theatre, what makes Destiny a forceful play are the theatrical ways in which Edgar manoeuvres the audience’s intellectual and emotional responses. Edgar’s central aim, an exploration of the political mechanism which leads people to support a fascist movement, is achieved in two ways: a Brechtian detachment and a dramatic technique designed to encourage the audience’s emotional engagement with characters or dramatic events. Destiny’s key historical context is established by the way in which the narrative follows through the ideological journeys of four different characters: Chandler, Turner, Rolfe and Khera. From the imperial twilight in India, on the eve of independence in 1947, to a by-election in the West Midlands some 30 years later, their lives are literally interwoven in social and political terms. Edgar’s combination of the play’s documentary dimension and its fictional aspect of creating typical situations and representative characters, clearly contains Lukacsian social-realist overtones.
But more importantly, the audience’s vulnerability becomes Edgar’s most effective weapon to criticise the fascist sentiment as the audience realizes the danger of being drawn into the fascist sentiment from inside, not from outside via direct attack on monstrous fascist figures. The audience’s sympathy is controlled and checked by its own emotional confrontation and shock as well as by Edgar’s more polemical dramatic techniques. The contradictory, irrational political force of a fascist movement which constructs national consciousness as a genuine agent in history is intellectually investigated by the audience. The concept of the nation as an imaginary community is tested and subverted via the audience’s consistent self-revising process.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-842-015919056