지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this study, I tried to investigate the distinctive aspects of the high school student’s historical understanding, focussed on the power, putting historical knowledge to practical use, to write history essay. For this, 342 highschool students were asked to wrote out their own historical essay as a important part of a term examination, about the upheaval of status system in the latter term of the Joseon Dynasty.
The question reads as follows. “At the end of 18th century, a male servant Childuk had lived in chung cheong-do. Yeuckgap was a ordinary peasant lived in jeon ra-do, contemporary of Childuk. Yeuckgap and Childuk were a servant and a peasant in their early days, but when old aged, they acted like a noble blood, Yang-Ban. What ever had happened to them? Write your idea about this.”
286 students handed in meaningful answer paper, 26 students guessed, but far off the mark and 30 failed completely.
Then I analyzed and essays in detail, under some criterion ; student’s knowledge, clear grip of the kernel of the question, power of thinking collectively in the historical context. This research has found that not a few students have a difficulty in chronological thinking. They mixed up the times of ImJin Waeran with the 18th century in making out essay. A quarter of all student, could write essay in recognition of the examiner’s intention. Then, about one third of them, that is to say, only 10% of all examinee, could reached the satisfactory writing, Which contained accurate knowledge, historical context or proper situation to 18th century, flowing and elegant style.
The question reads as follows. “At the end of 18th century, a male servant Childuk had lived in chung cheong-do. Yeuckgap was a ordinary peasant lived in jeon ra-do, contemporary of Childuk. Yeuckgap and Childuk were a servant and a peasant in their early days, but when old aged, they acted like a noble blood, Yang-Ban. What ever had happened to them? Write your idea about this.”
286 students handed in meaningful answer paper, 26 students guessed, but far off the mark and 30 failed completely.
Then I analyzed and essays in detail, under some criterion ; student’s knowledge, clear grip of the kernel of the question, power of thinking collectively in the historical context. This research has found that not a few students have a difficulty in chronological thinking. They mixed up the times of ImJin Waeran with the 18th century in making out essay. A quarter of all student, could write essay in recognition of the examiner’s intention. Then, about one third of them, that is to say, only 10% of all examinee, could reached the satisfactory writing, Which contained accurate knowledge, historical context or proper situation to 18th century, flowing and elegant style.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 평가 문항 구성과 분석 기준 설정
3. 답안 내용 분석 및 결과 정리
4. 맺음말
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
학생들의 역사 개념에 대한 이해 양상과 역사의식
역사교육
2009 .09
-
학생의 다양성과 역사교육 : 학생의 역사 정체성 및 역사의식, ‘다원적 역사’에 대한 해외 연구 검토
역사교육
2018 .12
-
역사적 사실의 특징과 역사교육의 특수성
역사교육
2010 .03
-
역사수업에 대한 학생들의 흥미연구
역사교육
2013 .09
-
EFL학습자의 영작문에 나타난 어휘 사용의 복잡도와 논리적 성숙도 분석
언어학 연구
2020 .04
-
사료내용의 전달방식에 따른 고등학생의 역사이해
역사교육
2013 .03
-
국가영어능력평가시험 2급 쓰기 과업 유형이 한국 영어 학습자의 영어 쓰기 수행에 미치는 영향
영어학
2013 .03
-
역사적 사고력 함양을 위한 유추의 활용 가능성 탐색
역사교육
2002 .09
-
李天輔의 史論體 散文에 대하여
민족문화
2008 .06
-
역사 재현의 수정에 대한 중등학생들의 이해 : 역사영화를 중심으로
역사교육
2010 .03
-
초·중·고 북한 이탈 학생의 쓰기 양상 분석 : 서술형 쓰기 평가 결과를 중심으로
국어교육연구
2016 .10
-
새로운 역사 교과서 구성방안 : 고대 로마사 학습의 경우
역사교육
2001 .09
-
칼 포퍼식 토론을 활용한 논술 교수 학습 방안
국어교육연구
2005 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-016728998