지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The north eastern part of China (Manchuria) was initially colonized by the immigrants that their sense of origin was weak.
And the sense of unity of Manchuria community with the government of Republic of China was thin and the legitimacy of the Republic government was not able to take proper root among the people. That is, national pressure on those who collaborated with Japan was weaker than in mainland China. Behind their collaboration with Japan was the emergence of various puppet regimes, the industrialization of Manchuria, the colonial ideology of Japan, the loss of national pride, and Japanese threat and temptation with the provision of benefits.
Comprised of many nationalities, the sentiment of Manchuria was diversely unique according to the history and characteristic by nationality, so that the understanding of Manchuria and response to collaboration with Manchuria was different by nationality. For example, some part of Mongolia collaborated with Japan in exchange for the autonomy and independence of Inner Mongolia. Especially the emperor Puyi and his subjects were eager to resurrect the Qing dynasty in Manchuria with Japanese help in exchange for their active collaborating with Japan.
The local people who collaborated for Japanese colonial occupation was basically afraid of mighty Japan, in national despair regardless they were Mongolians or Hans.
But then what they had in common was strong individual desire to protect their individual life and property and to be successful in their society, and they were the people who distanced themselves from Zhang Xueliang, had friendship with Japanese (especially Kantogun) as foreign students in Japan or had pro?Japanese sentiment, had dream of the resurrection of Qing Dynasty having cliquish or blood relationship with Qing Dynasty, had dream of autonomous or independent inner Mongolia as Mongolians, and felt heterogeneity against Pro?Han China.
In the early founding stage of Manchukuo, the local collaborators were regarded as important people and they were appointed to important positions. But as the colonial ruling became to have firm grip on it, the local collaborators began to be considered as obstacles. As result, the early collaborators were replaced or relegated to less important positions, consequently losing their political influence.
In conclusion, the Manchukuo that outwardly advocated independent nation was in fact a quasi nation that carried out Japanese colonialism by incorporating the local collaborators as lower part of their ruling system. The role of local people of Manchukuo was very important.
And the sense of unity of Manchuria community with the government of Republic of China was thin and the legitimacy of the Republic government was not able to take proper root among the people. That is, national pressure on those who collaborated with Japan was weaker than in mainland China. Behind their collaboration with Japan was the emergence of various puppet regimes, the industrialization of Manchuria, the colonial ideology of Japan, the loss of national pride, and Japanese threat and temptation with the provision of benefits.
Comprised of many nationalities, the sentiment of Manchuria was diversely unique according to the history and characteristic by nationality, so that the understanding of Manchuria and response to collaboration with Manchuria was different by nationality. For example, some part of Mongolia collaborated with Japan in exchange for the autonomy and independence of Inner Mongolia. Especially the emperor Puyi and his subjects were eager to resurrect the Qing dynasty in Manchuria with Japanese help in exchange for their active collaborating with Japan.
The local people who collaborated for Japanese colonial occupation was basically afraid of mighty Japan, in national despair regardless they were Mongolians or Hans.
But then what they had in common was strong individual desire to protect their individual life and property and to be successful in their society, and they were the people who distanced themselves from Zhang Xueliang, had friendship with Japanese (especially Kantogun) as foreign students in Japan or had pro?Japanese sentiment, had dream of the resurrection of Qing Dynasty having cliquish or blood relationship with Qing Dynasty, had dream of autonomous or independent inner Mongolia as Mongolians, and felt heterogeneity against Pro?Han China.
In the early founding stage of Manchukuo, the local collaborators were regarded as important people and they were appointed to important positions. But as the colonial ruling became to have firm grip on it, the local collaborators began to be considered as obstacles. As result, the early collaborators were replaced or relegated to less important positions, consequently losing their political influence.
In conclusion, the Manchukuo that outwardly advocated independent nation was in fact a quasi nation that carried out Japanese colonialism by incorporating the local collaborators as lower part of their ruling system. The role of local people of Manchukuo was very important.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 협력자 발생의 사회배경과 협력동기
Ⅲ. 만주국의 기반구축과 현지인의 참여행태
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
abstract
참고문헌 (36)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
지역체계의 허실 : 1930년대 조선과 만주의 관계
한국사회학
2003 .11
-
1930년대 일본 소년만화잡지에 나타난 ‘滿洲夢’
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2020 .07
-
중일전쟁기 화북의 대일 ‘협력자’ : 국내정치의 역학관계를 통해 본 협력정권의 형성
아세아연구
2006 .12
-
満洲国興農合作社における農事指導とその影響
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2016 .10
-
1930년대 초 동아시아 담론 연구 : 『삼천리』 게재된 ‘중국’에 대한 기사와 논설을 중심으로
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2009 .05
-
만주국과 조선과의 관계
아시아문화
2003 .08
-
Labour Migration in Modern Manchuria
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2018 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
만주국의 정치 이데올로기 창출과 종교
고병철
한신인문학연구
2005
.12
만주국의 신체동원과 국민만들기 : 체육정책의 전개를 중심으로
전경선
역사와 세계
2011
.06
「만주국」정부의 민족구성과 운영상의 특징
윤휘탁
중국근현대사연구
2009
.09
現代中國의 歷史認識과 ‘滿洲’觀
尹輝鐸
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2004
.06
Hunchun, the Qing-Chosŏn Borderland in the Eighteenth Century
Kim Seonmin
International Journal of Korean History
2016
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-017647001