메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
비교민속학회 비교민속학 比較民俗學 第26輯
발행연도
2004.2
수록면
437 - 467 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Folklore needs to study the changing social process, in which traditional rituals are maneuvered or secular rituals are newly created for political purposes. Here folklore of political ritual in contemporary society may include such secular rituals as drama or sports insofar as their purposes are political. It seems helpful to collect complete data of political ritual to apply Hymes' model of the descriptive ethnography of speaking.
To the extent that political ritual has its aim to project upon participants and the audience the political messages intended, it must be evaluated ultimately in terms of its psychological effects. But it will not do only to examine the psychological change the participants and the audience of the ritual go through in order to grasp the whole effects of the ritual. Rather since important part of the meanings of the ritual exists outside their consciousness beyond the exegetical dimension, it is proper to pay due attention to both the structuralist and the phenomenological meanings.
From this perspective I propose an aesthetical approach to the study of political ritual. The approach aims not at the actual effects that ritual has upon the participants, but its potential efficacy, viz., the analysis of how it is designed to that extent. Here it is necessary to endow the specialist on symbols and rituals with the status of evaluating the potential efficacy by his (or her) own aesthetical standards. Thus the aesthetical approach is to analyze the text and the context of the ritual from various angles in terms of the aesthetics of symbolic manipulation and its potential efficacy.
Here I have yet to provide the standards for aesthetic evaluations. And I must acknowledge that as Jarvie pointed out, the results of aesthetical evaluation may differ from and even conflict with each other. But the historical and cross-cultural study of political ritual will provide the wide vista for aesthetical evaluations.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 정치적 의례의 범주
Ⅲ. 정치적 의례의 해석 : 미학적 접근
Ⅳ. 의례의 민속지 방법
Ⅴ. 역사적 그리고 비교 문화적 연구의 필요성
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
「정치적 의례의 의미와 효과 : 미학적 접근」에 대한 논평

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-380-017628931