지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The revision of the Civil Law on 2005 preludes a major change in the traditional family concept of Koreans as it abolishes 'hojuje' or the patriarchal family registry system which will take effect in 2008. Under the revised Civil Law, children are allowed to adopt his or her mother's family name based on mutual consent from both parents, If a woman remarries, her children can also follow the family name of the stepfather with the court's approval.
The revised Civil Law is a triumph of individual dignity and equality and an inevitable response to the change in the times. On February 3rd 2005, the Constitutional Court handed down a 6-3 decision, ruling that the patriarchal family registry system is unconstitutional, triggering off public movement on the revision. This represents a step forward for human rights.
The main features of this revision in Family Law are as follows:
1. Abolition of the head of family system and prescribing new definition of family.
2. Easing the presumption of father's surname for new borne child.
3. Repealing the prevention on the marriage between same origins and adjusting the scope of intermarriage.
4. Abolition of forbidden clause of women's digamy in special period, improving of denial of paternity system, reforming of assent to adoption of person under fifteen years of age, introducing of adoption as a children of natural father and owing a precedence of welfare interest duty to parents.
5. Allowing the rights of succession for one who supports his parents and improving qualified acceptance of heritage.
Still, efforts will be needed to apply the revised law, because new system is said to be fragmentary and unconnected with actual circumstances. On this paper, I suggest several alternatives for future revision mainly on adjustment of the scope of relatives and supplement of contributory portion on inheritance and apportionment for person having special connection .
Above all things, I propose that the patriarchal family registration system would be replaced with an individual registration system. The envisioned registry document will each include records of people's birth, marriage, death and adoptions, along with their parents, spouses and children, but will not contain information on their siblings.
The revision will pave the way for children to change their surnames, which were traditionally only taken from their father's, In addition, the abolishment of the hoju system is expected to bring significant changes in our society, which has so far served as the basis of the country's family registry system. So alternative methods should be explored to minimize difficulties accompanying changes in old practices.
The revised Civil Law is a triumph of individual dignity and equality and an inevitable response to the change in the times. On February 3rd 2005, the Constitutional Court handed down a 6-3 decision, ruling that the patriarchal family registry system is unconstitutional, triggering off public movement on the revision. This represents a step forward for human rights.
The main features of this revision in Family Law are as follows:
1. Abolition of the head of family system and prescribing new definition of family.
2. Easing the presumption of father's surname for new borne child.
3. Repealing the prevention on the marriage between same origins and adjusting the scope of intermarriage.
4. Abolition of forbidden clause of women's digamy in special period, improving of denial of paternity system, reforming of assent to adoption of person under fifteen years of age, introducing of adoption as a children of natural father and owing a precedence of welfare interest duty to parents.
5. Allowing the rights of succession for one who supports his parents and improving qualified acceptance of heritage.
Still, efforts will be needed to apply the revised law, because new system is said to be fragmentary and unconnected with actual circumstances. On this paper, I suggest several alternatives for future revision mainly on adjustment of the scope of relatives and supplement of contributory portion on inheritance and apportionment for person having special connection .
Above all things, I propose that the patriarchal family registration system would be replaced with an individual registration system. The envisioned registry document will each include records of people's birth, marriage, death and adoptions, along with their parents, spouses and children, but will not contain information on their siblings.
The revision will pave the way for children to change their surnames, which were traditionally only taken from their father's, In addition, the abolishment of the hoju system is expected to bring significant changes in our society, which has so far served as the basis of the country's family registry system. So alternative methods should be explored to minimize difficulties accompanying changes in old practices.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 가족법의 개정경과
Ⅲ. 개정가족법(제12차 개정민법)의 내용
Ⅳ. 개정가족법(제12차 개정민법)의 시행과 과제
Ⅴ. 여론
參考文獻
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
改正民法에 대한 小考
비교법학연구
2005 .09
-
다양한 가족 유형의 확산에 따른 「민법」의 개선 과제 검토
가족법연구
2020 .01
-
戶主制에 관하여
비교법학연구
2005 .03
-
호주제도 폐지에 따른 민법규정 및 호적제도의 검토
법학연구
2006 .02
-
가족복지정책이 갖는 의미에 대한 연구 : 가족 행위 규제 내용을 중심으로
보건과 복지
2006 .12
-
법의 한계 영역으로서의 가정(家庭)
法學論文集
2013 .01
-
유아기 자녀를 둔 가족의 가족의례 군집유형에 따른 가족건강성의 차이
유아교육연구
2019 .01
-
몽골 유학생의 가정건강성에 관한 연구 - 여자 대학원생을 중심으로 -
몽골학
2017 .01
-
장애아가족의 가족 탄력성증진을 위한 가족복지서비스의 개선방안
한국가족복지학
2014 .01
-
민사법에서의 Gender
법학논집
2001 .01
-
가족관계등록법에 관한 검토
원광법학
2009 .01
-
지역주민의 가족친화정책 인식에 관한 연구 : 충청남도를 중심으로
지역사회연구
2011 .06
-
A Study on Family Type and Family Cycle in Korea
人口問題論集
1983 .03
-
자녀가 경험한 부모 이혼과 부자가족으로의 적응에 대한 질적 연구
Human Ecology Research
2016 .01
-
아동기 가정폭력을 경험한 내담자 가족의 갈등치유를 위한 가족상담사례연구
한국가족관계학회지
2020 .01
-
혼인관계 및 가족형태가 친권에 미치는 영향
서강법학
2009 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
친권정지·제한제도에 관한 민법일부개정법률안의 소개 및 검토
김민지
국민대학교 법학연구소 학술발표대회 논문집
2014
.09
문화재반환사건에 있어서 민법 및 국제사법상 몇 가지 쟁점 : 1995년 UNIDROIT문화재환수협약의 관련규정을 고려하여
송호영
국제사법연구
2009
.12
신상 결정 대행에 대한 법원의 감독 : 개정민법 제947조의2의 해석을 중심으로
이지은
비교사법
2012
.02
민법 제765조상의 賠償額 輕減請求
오종근
비교사법
1997
.06
改正 獨逸民法의 解除·解止法의 一瞥 : 우리 民法典의 改正試案에 관한 論議에 부쳐서
安法榮
비교사법
2002
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-017568370