지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Family-head system indicates the relation between hoju, the head of family and his family members. It prescribes the position in the family legally, like who will be the hoju and who will be the family members. It also makes hoju to take the central role of a family members. When one changes his social stading, he may also change which family he belongs.
For example, if one gets married, he can establish a new family registration, as a result, all people should be registered to a family. However, the meaning of family in the hoju does not carry a friendly family relations just a group of members who are belonging to the hoju.
During the Corea and Chosun dynasty there was a similar system made to impose labor and taxes. It is function was similar to that of pregent resident registration system and hoju was like a householder at that time. However, the traditional meaning was deteriorated, by far with the actual common life in families, by the Minjeokbub and Chosunhojeokryung that Japanese imperialism adopted. The most crucial change was that hoju became a supervisor having absolute power on creating a hierarchy.
Meanwhile, in November of 99, UN Human Rights Commission(UNHRC)urged that family-head system should be abolished because it reflects paternalism and rather intensifies it.
The Korea government joined Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), but decided to leave chosing one`s family name up to the family. The request for abolition of hoju system, which 114civic groups have remarked, didn`t even layed before the National Assembly.
There are problems indicated in the ideological and legal part of family-head system. First, it is an acquired idea, from Japan. Second, it causes paternalistic thoughts among people. Third, the succession of family-head position is unconstitutional. These are the ideological part.
The legal part is first, when the succeeding by hoju system the androcentric principles follow. Second, it is making one`s spouse to register to husband`s census record. Third, when children are born, they have to follow father`s family name and census register.
A view for maintaining the family-head system is supported by some ideas. 1)Removing family-head system is to eliminate our traditional family system. 2)hoju has an important meaning that man instinctively succeeds to the family line.
On the other hand, these are the following ideas of the supporters arguing to eradicate family-head system. 1)It is violating the spirit of constitutions law which is stating the dignity of marriage and equality in both sexes. 2)The ranking which can succeed to the position of hoju is male-centered and reflects the social tendency to neglect women. When a hoju dies, the position is succeeded to an order of his son, daughter, spouse, women`s mother-in-law.
For exemple, a son who is about 1 year old, can be a hoju of his grandmother who is about 70 years old. 3)Family-head system is disturbing human rights. When a spouse divorces her husband, and even marries again, her child should follow her former husband`s family registration. So it is violating our human right focing us to give up one`s freedom of will.
By 50 lawmakers` proposal, a revised bill about the civil law, which has deleted the regulations for spouses and her children following her husband`s census record will be submitted to the National Assembly on May 27. If the National Assembly passes the bill, family-head system will be abolished. When we think of it, family-head system is not just limited in the relations among household members but affects the basis of family system which is essential in our society. So we should be cautious when amending these parts. What we should consider most is the spriit of constitutional law, the dignity of human and equality of marriage.
Consequently, the idea to abolish hoju is holding a prominent position. The only question is how to decide on the type of organizing each family or to modify the residents registration act. Before that, we need a common consent about the degree of change. We should be ready in cases of preventing marriage between relatives, confusions of changing family names frequently when amend family-head system.
For example, if one gets married, he can establish a new family registration, as a result, all people should be registered to a family. However, the meaning of family in the hoju does not carry a friendly family relations just a group of members who are belonging to the hoju.
During the Corea and Chosun dynasty there was a similar system made to impose labor and taxes. It is function was similar to that of pregent resident registration system and hoju was like a householder at that time. However, the traditional meaning was deteriorated, by far with the actual common life in families, by the Minjeokbub and Chosunhojeokryung that Japanese imperialism adopted. The most crucial change was that hoju became a supervisor having absolute power on creating a hierarchy.
Meanwhile, in November of 99, UN Human Rights Commission(UNHRC)urged that family-head system should be abolished because it reflects paternalism and rather intensifies it.
The Korea government joined Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), but decided to leave chosing one`s family name up to the family. The request for abolition of hoju system, which 114civic groups have remarked, didn`t even layed before the National Assembly.
There are problems indicated in the ideological and legal part of family-head system. First, it is an acquired idea, from Japan. Second, it causes paternalistic thoughts among people. Third, the succession of family-head position is unconstitutional. These are the ideological part.
The legal part is first, when the succeeding by hoju system the androcentric principles follow. Second, it is making one`s spouse to register to husband`s census record. Third, when children are born, they have to follow father`s family name and census register.
A view for maintaining the family-head system is supported by some ideas. 1)Removing family-head system is to eliminate our traditional family system. 2)hoju has an important meaning that man instinctively succeeds to the family line.
On the other hand, these are the following ideas of the supporters arguing to eradicate family-head system. 1)It is violating the spirit of constitutions law which is stating the dignity of marriage and equality in both sexes. 2)The ranking which can succeed to the position of hoju is male-centered and reflects the social tendency to neglect women. When a hoju dies, the position is succeeded to an order of his son, daughter, spouse, women`s mother-in-law.
For exemple, a son who is about 1 year old, can be a hoju of his grandmother who is about 70 years old. 3)Family-head system is disturbing human rights. When a spouse divorces her husband, and even marries again, her child should follow her former husband`s family registration. So it is violating our human right focing us to give up one`s freedom of will.
By 50 lawmakers` proposal, a revised bill about the civil law, which has deleted the regulations for spouses and her children following her husband`s census record will be submitted to the National Assembly on May 27. If the National Assembly passes the bill, family-head system will be abolished. When we think of it, family-head system is not just limited in the relations among household members but affects the basis of family system which is essential in our society. So we should be cautious when amending these parts. What we should consider most is the spriit of constitutional law, the dignity of human and equality of marriage.
Consequently, the idea to abolish hoju is holding a prominent position. The only question is how to decide on the type of organizing each family or to modify the residents registration act. Before that, we need a common consent about the degree of change. We should be ready in cases of preventing marriage between relatives, confusions of changing family names frequently when amend family-head system.
목차
Ⅰ. 序
Ⅱ. 戶主制 一般
Ⅲ. 戶主制存ㆍ廢에 대한 論據
Ⅳ. 決語
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
改正民法에 대한 小考
비교법학연구
2005 .09
-
가족복지정책이 갖는 의미에 대한 연구 : 가족 행위 규제 내용을 중심으로
보건과 복지
2006 .12
-
'전통'과 '여성'의 만남 : 호주제도 위헌소송에 관한 문화 연구
법사학연구
2002 .04
-
A Study on Family Type and Family Cycle in Korea
人口問題論集
1983 .03
-
유아기 자녀를 둔 가족의 가족의례 군집유형에 따른 가족건강성의 차이
유아교육연구
2019 .01
-
아동기 가정폭력을 경험한 내담자 가족의 갈등치유를 위한 가족상담사례연구
한국가족관계학회지
2020 .01
-
몽골 유학생의 가정건강성에 관한 연구 - 여자 대학원생을 중심으로 -
몽골학
2017 .01
-
家族法改正의 內容과 課題 : 제12차 민법개정을 중심으로
법학연구
2005 .06
-
호주제도 위헌소송에 관한 법사회학적 고찰 : ‘가족’의 변화를 중심으로
한국사회학
2002 .10
-
다양한 가족 유형의 확산에 따른 「민법」의 개선 과제 검토
가족법연구
2020 .01
-
호텔 여성 근로자의 일과 가정의 균형(Work-Family Balance)에 관한 연구
관광레저연구
2013 .08
-
호주제도 폐지에 따른 민법규정 및 호적제도의 검토
법학연구
2006 .02
-
가족관광 촉진요인이 가족관광 참여 및 가족역동성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
관광레저연구
2014 .05
-
지역주민의 가족친화정책 인식에 관한 연구 : 충청남도를 중심으로
지역사회연구
2011 .06
-
법의 한계 영역으로서의 가정(家庭)
法學論文集
2013 .01
-
장애아가족의 가족 탄력성증진을 위한 가족복지서비스의 개선방안
한국가족복지학
2014 .01
-
육아기 맞벌이 남성의 일·가정 양립 경험
Human Ecology Research
2013 .01
-
장기적으로 활동한 아이돌보미의 가족 레질리언스 분석: 월시(Walsh)의 관점을 중심으로
Human Ecology Research
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-015296377