지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The present paper purports to lay down a preliminary assessment on the role of the judiciary in the 'war against terrorism' since the attacks of September 11, 2001 in particular. In constitutional perspective growing concerns have been expressed over the sweeping breadth of the executive's assertion based on the national security as it relates to the protection of civil rights, especially of foreigners residing in the United States.
Despite constitutionally anchored notions of 'due process' and 'equal protection' guaranteeing the protection of civil liberties and other rights, faced with the terrorist acts which the Administration views legal equivalent of belligerent acts, one is not deemed to enjoy those rights as before. President Bush went on even further by postulating a new concept : "We are protected from attack only by vigorous action abroad, and increased vigilance at home." America thus declared War on Terrorism.
A war scenario gives the President , as commander-in-chief, an extensive room for maneuver. Various measures based on the "Need for Proactive Protection" have been taken by the executive. In this context, fundamental constitutional principles regarding the contest between 'national security' and 'civil liberties' came to be reassessed within the constraints of the laws of war.
Three landmark cases, Rasul, Hamdi, and Padilla, arose recently in the aftermath of September 11. Departing from its traditional deferential approach, the Supreme Court emphatically rejected the government's contention that it could detain indefinitely anyone it designated as an 'enemy combatant' in the war against terrorism. These and others are dealt with in the paper with a view to putting forward a preliminary assessment on the evolving constitutional law relating to the 'war on terrorism'.
Despite constitutionally anchored notions of 'due process' and 'equal protection' guaranteeing the protection of civil liberties and other rights, faced with the terrorist acts which the Administration views legal equivalent of belligerent acts, one is not deemed to enjoy those rights as before. President Bush went on even further by postulating a new concept : "We are protected from attack only by vigorous action abroad, and increased vigilance at home." America thus declared War on Terrorism.
A war scenario gives the President , as commander-in-chief, an extensive room for maneuver. Various measures based on the "Need for Proactive Protection" have been taken by the executive. In this context, fundamental constitutional principles regarding the contest between 'national security' and 'civil liberties' came to be reassessed within the constraints of the laws of war.
Three landmark cases, Rasul, Hamdi, and Padilla, arose recently in the aftermath of September 11. Departing from its traditional deferential approach, the Supreme Court emphatically rejected the government's contention that it could detain indefinitely anyone it designated as an 'enemy combatant' in the war against terrorism. These and others are dealt with in the paper with a view to putting forward a preliminary assessment on the evolving constitutional law relating to the 'war on terrorism'.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 9.11테러와 미국사회의 변화
Ⅲ. 테러와 기본권
Ⅳ. 테러관련 주요판례와 판례경향
Ⅴ. 맺음말
저자소개
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
테러 유형 및 대테러 방안
한국경찰학회보
2004 .01
-
우리나라 테러방지관련법에 관한 연구
Crisisonomy
2007 .01
-
국민안전과 인권보호를 위한 테러방지법 개선방안 연구
동아법학
2019 .05
-
테러방지법의 처벌규정에 대한 기본권 보장적 해석 ― 미국 등 대테러법제와의 비교 ―
미국헌법연구
2019 .12
-
테러가 경제에 미치는 영향
[BOK] 해외경제 포커스
2005 .08
-
미래 국제 테러 유형과 전망에 관한 연구
한국경호경비학회지
2008 .01
-
군 대테러 활동 강화방안에 관한 연구
한국치안행정논집
2017 .01
-
근로자 징계의 법리
법학논총
1989 .12
-
테러의 효과적 예방과 척결을 위한 법제도 정비방안
비교형사법연구
2014 .01
-
테러방지법안에 대한 주요논점 및 보완적 고찰
한국경찰연구
2010 .01
-
테러동향 변화에 따른 군․경 테러 대응체계 개선방향
치안정책연구
2017 .01
-
해외 방문 및 체류자의 대테러 자가 위기관리 행동 기법에 관한 연구
Crisisonomy
2007 .01
-
9ㆍ11 테러이후 미국 對테러정책의 변화에 대한 분석과 전망
국제정치논총
2003 .06
-
Effective Countermeasure against Terrorism and Guarantee of Human Rights
저스티스
2003 .10
-
현행 ‘국가대테러활동지침’의 문제점과 입법적 개선방안에 관한 연구
한국경호경비학회지
2009 .01
-
최근 국, 내외 테러 동향과테러공격 방법에 대한 분석
경찰학논총
2014 .01
-
대테러정책과 인권의 조화 문제 연구
한국경찰학회보
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-362-017407972