지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The generative tonology is started to solve the problems that structural linguistics is phonologically not fully enough. So This theory is focused on investigate essential tonological properties and functions of each tone and tone patterns. As the result of that, finding the basic principles of dominating tone phenomena is the goal of generative tonology.
The core concepts of structural-generative phonological tonology are cheukseong (marked feature) and tonemic patterns (tone unit), and they are based on the following assumptions.
First, there is no constraint on the combination of tones on the underlying level. However, when tones are combined to make a phonological word, the universal tone rules dominating these combinations decide a finite number of possible tonemic patterns in each dialect. When the tonemic patterns are realized phonologically, the pitch form realization rules of each dialect decide the surface pitch forms.
A breath group(or rhythm unit) is a unit of tone description. A tonemic pattern is a phonological word composed of combination of tonemes. A surface pitch form is phonetic realization of a tonemic pattern. The phonological process of ‘underlying tone ― (tone combination rules) → surface tone ― (pitch form control rules) → realization of pitch form’ is assumed.
The most important result of the study on structural-generative phonological tonology was the discovery of universal tone neutralization rules and pitch form realization rules that dominate the whole of Korean tone dialects.
This tone neutralization rule means that Cheukseong (Geoseong or Sangseong) neutralizes any tone into Cheukseong in the following position within a phonological word. By this rule, the most common tone patterns which the whole of Korean tone dialects have are /L₁/, /H₁Lⁿ/, /?₁/, On the other hand, the corresponded pattern to /?₁/ is /?₁/ in the dialects of the eastern coast, and is /?₁/ in the Geongnam dialects, and is /R₁/ in the Yeongdong dialects. Hamgyeong dialects particularly have the only tone patterns of /L?Hⁿ/.
And those tone patterns are represented by the common pitch form realization rules which are ‘/H₂Lⁿ/→[L₁HLⁿ], /L₂/→[HHL?], /?₂/→[?HL?], /?₂/→[?L₁], /?₁/→[?L?₁]/[?LLL₁], /R₁/→[RL?]’, Whereas ‘/H₂Lⁿ/→[LH₁Lⁿ]’ is applied to the Gyeongnam dialects, and ‘/L₂/→[LHL?]’ is applied to the Yeongdong dialects.
The core concepts of structural-generative phonological tonology are cheukseong (marked feature) and tonemic patterns (tone unit), and they are based on the following assumptions.
First, there is no constraint on the combination of tones on the underlying level. However, when tones are combined to make a phonological word, the universal tone rules dominating these combinations decide a finite number of possible tonemic patterns in each dialect. When the tonemic patterns are realized phonologically, the pitch form realization rules of each dialect decide the surface pitch forms.
A breath group(or rhythm unit) is a unit of tone description. A tonemic pattern is a phonological word composed of combination of tonemes. A surface pitch form is phonetic realization of a tonemic pattern. The phonological process of ‘underlying tone ― (tone combination rules) → surface tone ― (pitch form control rules) → realization of pitch form’ is assumed.
The most important result of the study on structural-generative phonological tonology was the discovery of universal tone neutralization rules and pitch form realization rules that dominate the whole of Korean tone dialects.
This tone neutralization rule means that Cheukseong (Geoseong or Sangseong) neutralizes any tone into Cheukseong in the following position within a phonological word. By this rule, the most common tone patterns which the whole of Korean tone dialects have are /L₁/, /H₁Lⁿ/, /?₁/, On the other hand, the corresponded pattern to /?₁/ is /?₁/ in the dialects of the eastern coast, and is /?₁/ in the Geongnam dialects, and is /R₁/ in the Yeongdong dialects. Hamgyeong dialects particularly have the only tone patterns of /L?Hⁿ/.
And those tone patterns are represented by the common pitch form realization rules which are ‘/H₂Lⁿ/→[L₁HLⁿ], /L₂/→[HHL?], /?₂/→[?HL?], /?₂/→[?L₁], /?₁/→[?L?₁]/[?LLL₁], /R₁/→[RL?]’, Whereas ‘/H₂Lⁿ/→[LH₁Lⁿ]’ is applied to the Gyeongnam dialects, and ‘/L₂/→[LHL?]’ is applied to the Yeongdong dialects.
목차
1. 서론
2. 성조소 확인, 성조체계 수립
3. 성조 표기법
4. 성조 기술의 단위
5. 성조 기술의 층위
6. 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]
저자소개
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
성조 연구
한국언어학회 학술대회지
2004 .12
-
우리말 성조 연구에서 방점 표상과 성조 표상
한글
2004 .09
-
국어 성조론에서의 성조형의 개념과 위상
한글
2013 .09
-
국어 성조 기술 방법 비교 연구
한글
2003 .06
-
월 속에서의 성조의 기능
언어학
1978 .04
-
한국인의 중국어 성조 인지와 음성 특징 고찰
중국언어연구
2015 .01
-
상승조 성조의 음조 변화 방향
어문학
2014 .09
-
영월 방언의 거성형과 성조 변화
한글
2020 .03
-
16세기말 국어 성조와 경남 방언 성조의 대응 관계 : 풀이씨의 고정 성조 어간을 중심으로
언어학
1989 .04
-
평창 방언의 성조 연구
한글
2015 .06
-
중세 국어 성조의 재분석
언어과학연구
1991 .12
-
성조의 청취적 인식과 실험 음성학적 실측의 상관성
어문연구
2012 .01
-
사천 방언과 남해 방언의 성조 체계 비교 연구
한글
2004 .12
-
우리말 방언 성조 체계 설정 방법 -대립과 중화에 바탕을 두고-
어문연구
2004 .01
-
중세 국어 성조와 경상도 방언 성조의 비교 연구 : 「노 소리」에 대한 새로운 해석을 중심으로
언어
1995 .06
-
소학언해와 창원 방언 한자어 성조의 비교
어문연구
2012 .01
-
국어 성조론과 서부 경남 방언의 성조
한글
1973 .09
-
모음 탈락과 성조 재배열 - 중세국어와 정선방언의 비교를 중심으로
겨레어문학
2014 .01
-
방점표기의 원칙과 성조변화
국어국문학
1974 .09
-
창원 방언과 중세국어에서 입성 한자 형태소의 성조에 대하여
한글
2008 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-710-017309146