지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper examines the direction of pitch change of the rising tone and tonemic patterns focused on Gangneong, Jeongseon, Andong, and Daegu dialects.
The phonetic representation of tone is described as follows with Roman letters : R(rising tone from L to H), ?ˇ (rising tone within L), ?(high and long tone), H(high tone), L(low tone), ?(lower tone). The rising tone has a low(L)－high(H) contour, thus that is longer more than 0.5 mora than others. The change of pitch of rising tone starts from weakening and losing the low－high contour. An than the length of syllable is dissipated.
The descriptive analysis reveals that there is a pattern of pitch change of the rising tone; [R]→[?ˇ ]→[?]→[H]. This shows that the dissipating of rising contour leads the pitch to H of the ‘L－H’ contour.
The pitch of tonemic pattern is also changed. I can say three patterns of that and those are ‘[RHL?]→[?ˇ HL?]→[?HL?]→[HHL?](Pattern A)’, ‘[RL₁]→[?ˇ L₁]→[?L₁]→[HL₁](Pattern B)’, ‘[RH₁]→[?ˇ ?₁HLⁿ]→ *[??₁HLⁿ]→[L?₁HLⁿ]→[L₁HLⁿ](Pattern C)’. Gyeongbuk Inland Regions shows Pattern A, Gangwon Inland Regions and Gangneong shows Pattern A and C, Pattern B is seen in the said all Regions. Unusually, in Samcheok and the eastern coast of Gyeongbuk, [?L₁] seems to be changing into [HHL?]/[HL₁](mainly into the former). To say something about that, we need further study of those dialects.
The phonetic representation of tone is described as follows with Roman letters : R(rising tone from L to H), ?ˇ (rising tone within L), ?(high and long tone), H(high tone), L(low tone), ?(lower tone). The rising tone has a low(L)－high(H) contour, thus that is longer more than 0.5 mora than others. The change of pitch of rising tone starts from weakening and losing the low－high contour. An than the length of syllable is dissipated.
The descriptive analysis reveals that there is a pattern of pitch change of the rising tone; [R]→[?ˇ ]→[?]→[H]. This shows that the dissipating of rising contour leads the pitch to H of the ‘L－H’ contour.
The pitch of tonemic pattern is also changed. I can say three patterns of that and those are ‘[RHL?]→[?ˇ HL?]→[?HL?]→[HHL?](Pattern A)’, ‘[RL₁]→[?ˇ L₁]→[?L₁]→[HL₁](Pattern B)’, ‘[RH₁]→[?ˇ ?₁HLⁿ]→ *[??₁HLⁿ]→[L?₁HLⁿ]→[L₁HLⁿ](Pattern C)’. Gyeongbuk Inland Regions shows Pattern A, Gangwon Inland Regions and Gangneong shows Pattern A and C, Pattern B is seen in the said all Regions. Unusually, in Samcheok and the eastern coast of Gyeongbuk, [?L₁] seems to be changing into [HHL?]/[HL₁](mainly into the former). To say something about that, we need further study of those dialects.
목차
1. 서론
2. 강릉 방언 상성의 음조 변화
3. 정선 방언 상성의 음조 변화
4. 안동 · 대구 방언 상성의 음조 변화
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (14)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학위논문] - 김봉국 / 2002 / 강원도 남부지역 방언의 음운론 / 박사 / 서울대학교 대학원
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김주원 / 2003 / 강원도 동해안 방언 성조의 특성 / 민족문화논총 27 : 249 ~ 283
3. [단행본] - 김차균 / 1999 / 우리말 방언 성조의 비교 / 도서출판 역락
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김차균 / 2002 / 창원 방언과 안동 방언 성조의 비교 / 우리말글 25 : 1 ~ 80
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김차균 / 2003 / 영남 방언 및 영동 방언에서 순행평성동화의 대조적 연구 / 우리말글 29 : 1 ~ 105
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김주원 / 2003 / 강원도 동해안 방언 성조의 특성 / 민족문화논총 27 : 249 ~ 283
3. [단행본] - 김차균 / 1999 / 우리말 방언 성조의 비교 / 도서출판 역락
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김차균 / 2002 / 창원 방언과 안동 방언 성조의 비교 / 우리말글 25 : 1 ~ 80
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김차균 / 2003 / 영남 방언 및 영동 방언에서 순행평성동화의 대조적 연구 / 우리말글 29 : 1 ~ 105
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-800-002750833