지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Robert Morris(1931- ), one of the founders of the Minimalist art movement, has presented various concepts and works since late 1950s. He worked across so many genres of artistic practice(Minimal and Conceptual sculpture, performance art, land art, scatter pieces, felt works, painting, drawing, photography, film, readymades, image/text composites, environment work). In spite of this variety, his works have a common and basic concept, “process”, which emphasizes the temporal process for artist’ s making and spectator’ s experiencing a work.
This study attempts to prove that “process” is the most important concept for his art, and that it offers consistent methods for his works. His “process” makes his art characteristic and different from other artists.
For Morris, the “process” means that on the one hand, all procedures of artmaking including form, content, artist’ s intention and purport come up to the surface, on the other hand, viewer’ s experiences are not decided uniformly but opened to the various possibilities. The “process” accompanies the temporality which is not transcendental or ideological but existential and phenomenological.
Morris always rejects the notion that art lasts. Furthermore, he attacks the rationalistic notion that art is a form of work that results in a finished product. He thinks that paradox and the fugitive be more attractive than assured style and stable position. In these means, his concept “process” is based on as well as the doubts and indeterminacy in science of his times as the change of philosophy and the world view.
Morris could manifest various psychological, philosophical and sociological problems by means of the “process”. In order to express the idea of paradoxical and complex space of the self, on the one hand, he uses a method of closure directly in making objects, and installations which imprison his own or spectator’ s body, on the other hand, makes spectators experience the fragmented and confused language and sound. Psychological frustration and embarrassment are experienced once more in Mirror installations that confuse spectator’ s perception.
From the study on “process” of Morris, we can get the result that “process” is a basic element for understanding his works, and testifies his outlook on art and world. Artists in Process Art and Conceptual Art, Earth Art in 1970s, stress the “process” too. But his “process” is an unique method which is originated from the movement, temporality, and spatiality of dance. It was his inevitable consequence that reflected his individual philosophy and the spirit of his times.
This study attempts to prove that “process” is the most important concept for his art, and that it offers consistent methods for his works. His “process” makes his art characteristic and different from other artists.
For Morris, the “process” means that on the one hand, all procedures of artmaking including form, content, artist’ s intention and purport come up to the surface, on the other hand, viewer’ s experiences are not decided uniformly but opened to the various possibilities. The “process” accompanies the temporality which is not transcendental or ideological but existential and phenomenological.
Morris always rejects the notion that art lasts. Furthermore, he attacks the rationalistic notion that art is a form of work that results in a finished product. He thinks that paradox and the fugitive be more attractive than assured style and stable position. In these means, his concept “process” is based on as well as the doubts and indeterminacy in science of his times as the change of philosophy and the world view.
Morris could manifest various psychological, philosophical and sociological problems by means of the “process”. In order to express the idea of paradoxical and complex space of the self, on the one hand, he uses a method of closure directly in making objects, and installations which imprison his own or spectator’ s body, on the other hand, makes spectators experience the fragmented and confused language and sound. Psychological frustration and embarrassment are experienced once more in Mirror installations that confuse spectator’ s perception.
From the study on “process” of Morris, we can get the result that “process” is a basic element for understanding his works, and testifies his outlook on art and world. Artists in Process Art and Conceptual Art, Earth Art in 1970s, stress the “process” too. But his “process” is an unique method which is originated from the movement, temporality, and spatiality of dance. It was his inevitable consequence that reflected his individual philosophy and the spirit of his times.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 - 모리스의 과정
Ⅱ. 신체를 이용한 과정 개념의 표현
Ⅲ. 폐쇄와 혼란의 ‘과정’
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
뉴미디어아트의 유희적 미경험 : 모리스 베나윤의 작품을 중심으로
서양미술사학회논문집
2008 .08
-
과정미술(Process art)에서 나타나는 섬유의 가변성 연구 -로버트 모리스, 에바 헤세 작품연구 중심으로-
예술과 미디어
2014 .01
-
미술과 공예 : 그 경계와 위상
미술사학
2007 .08
-
무용과 과학기술을 융합한 그룹 E.A.T.에 관한 연구
무용예술학연구
2019 .01
-
Glocalization 시대의 현대미술
현대미술학 논문집
2006 .12
-
노마디즘 공간적 특성을 적용한 미술대학 공간계획에 관한 연구
한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집
2019 .11
-
1950년대의 한국미술(1), 제1공화국 미술의 태동과 진통
미술사논단
2015 .06
-
‘움직이는 조각’과 공연예술
서양미술사학회논문집
1990 .12
-
현대미술 감상 및 표현수업 지도방안 연구 - 실험적 관점에 의한 7가지 방법론을 중심으로 -
조형교육
2009 .01
-
미술공예 운동에 대한 연구 : 윌리엄 모리스를 중심으로
한국디자인문화학회지
2010 .12
-
미술의 공공성을 둘러싼 경합의 위상학 : 일본에서의 미술가·비평가 탄생에 대한 재해석
한국근현대미술사학
2009 .12
-
1960년대 이후 한국 현대미술에 관한 사회학적 논의 : 브르디외(Pierre Bourdieu)의 ‘자본’ 개념을 활용한 사회구조적 분석
미술사연구
2009 .12
-
지역 미술과 권력
미술이론과 현장
2005 .01
-
미디어 아트의 환영에 관한 기고
AURA
2007 .01
-
미술비평의 효용성에 대해 다시 묻는다 : 아서 단토의 ‘미술종말론’에 대한 비평적 독서
현대미술학 논문집
2006 .12
-
스베트라나 앨퍼스에 대한 비평적 조망
현대미술사연구
2011 .12
-
개념미술의 두 얼굴 : 비상업적 미술과 탈자본주의의 한계
미술사학
2004 .08
-
미술가와 역사-미술사 교육의 한계와 전망
미술이론과 현장
2004 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
개념미술 속의 사진들 : 존 발데사리의 작품을 중심으로
전혜숙
현대미술사연구
2002
.12
미니멀리즘, 1967
강태희
서양미술사학회논문집
1991
.12
로버트 어윈: 지각과 공간의 예술
우정아
,
진휘연
미술사학
2010
.08
21세기 서양미학의 동향과 전망을 위한 시론 3 : 니콜라 부리오의 얼터모더니즘(Altermodernism)에 대한 비판적 독해 : 얼터모더니즘은 포스트모더니즘 ‘이후’의 대안인가?
김종기
현대미술학 논문집
2017
.06
전쟁의 기억 : 보디츠코의 (반)기념비 프로젝트
신채기
현대미술사연구
2016
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-609-017289356