지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The character of the history of art began to be criticized for the narrowness of its range of subject matter and concentration on individual artists whom it classified as geniuses in the late twentieth century. It useful to define this change as being from the traditional study of the history of art to the study of art history. In the history of art, the subject is ‘art’, and the study is of the patterns of caution, however now, art is being increasingly perceived as a means as well as an end, and in art history the subject is ‘history’, especially social and cultural history. Here the goal of scholarship is to achieve a more profound understanding of individuals and societies, and works of art provide tangible evidence. Art history as a discipline, its new, critical and interdisciplinary methodology of art has become an intellectual advantage in a scholarly world of an increasingly permeable border between the humanities and the social sciences ; a world of relative rather than absolute quality. At present, the two most distinctive trends in the new art history are the interest in the social aspects of art and the stress on theory.
The path-breaking work of Anglo-American scholars, Svetlana Leontief Alpers brings into focus the heterogeneous nature of art. She place much value on the basic art-historical notion of representation as well as circumstances and visual culture. In addition, Alpers thinks nowhere is this "transparent view of art" less appropriate, then she propose to view art circumstantially. Appealing to circumstances mean not only to see art as a social manifestation but also to gain access to images through a consideration of their place, role, and presence in the broader culture. In addition to circumstantial studies have tended to concentrate on the artist as the viewer of his/her art or as the maker of a work to be viewed. Much attention is paid to how paintings have been seen. The pressure is outward from the work. But there is another account which has to do less with how the viewer is served, than with the satisfactions of the maker. The pressure is inward, on the artist in the making. Alpers has served the art historical community excellently by raising the intellectual stakes of Dutch art in seventeenth century and its European context. It gives new horizons for the interpretation of art and the phenomenon of picture making itself.
Shortly, Alpers"s methodology is an example of the centrality of art history among current disciplines by replacing a sector of the history of art within its proper context of intellectual history.
The path-breaking work of Anglo-American scholars, Svetlana Leontief Alpers brings into focus the heterogeneous nature of art. She place much value on the basic art-historical notion of representation as well as circumstances and visual culture. In addition, Alpers thinks nowhere is this "transparent view of art" less appropriate, then she propose to view art circumstantially. Appealing to circumstances mean not only to see art as a social manifestation but also to gain access to images through a consideration of their place, role, and presence in the broader culture. In addition to circumstantial studies have tended to concentrate on the artist as the viewer of his/her art or as the maker of a work to be viewed. Much attention is paid to how paintings have been seen. The pressure is outward from the work. But there is another account which has to do less with how the viewer is served, than with the satisfactions of the maker. The pressure is inward, on the artist in the making. Alpers has served the art historical community excellently by raising the intellectual stakes of Dutch art in seventeenth century and its European context. It gives new horizons for the interpretation of art and the phenomenon of picture making itself.
Shortly, Alpers"s methodology is an example of the centrality of art history among current disciplines by replacing a sector of the history of art within its proper context of intellectual history.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 개념적 추이
Ⅲ. 논의의 표면화
Ⅳ. 방법적 개정
Ⅳ. 맺으며
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (41)
참고문헌 신청
2. [학위논문] - 김경선 / 2009 / 스베트라나 앨퍼스의 신미술사학 / 박사 / 이화여자대학교 대학원
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김영나 / 1997 / 미술이론의 역사와 신미술사학 / 예술 문화 연구 7 : 7 ~ 24
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이영철 / 2001 / 미술사 연구의 새로운 동향:1970년대 이후 유럽 신미술사의 움직임 / 계원논총 7 : 555 ~ 569
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 전동호 / 2005 / 미술사와 시각문화의 정체성 / 미술사와 시각문화 (4) : 8 ~ 31
7. [단행본] - Ackerman, James S / 1963 / Western Art History, Art and Archaeology: HumanisticScholarship in America / Prentice Hall : 217 ~ 218
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김영나 / 1997 / 미술이론의 역사와 신미술사학 / 예술 문화 연구 7 : 7 ~ 24
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이영철 / 2001 / 미술사 연구의 새로운 동향:1970년대 이후 유럽 신미술사의 움직임 / 계원논총 7 : 555 ~ 569
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 전동호 / 2005 / 미술사와 시각문화의 정체성 / 미술사와 시각문화 (4) : 8 ~ 31
7. [단행본] - Ackerman, James S / 1963 / Western Art History, Art and Archaeology: HumanisticScholarship in America / Prentice Hall : 217 ~ 218
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
시각문화연구의 개념적 정초에 대한 소고 : 그 토대 연구를 위한 시론
김경선
현대미술학 논문집
2013
.07
자동차용 휠 베어링의 피로해석
이승표
,
안정호
,
조영걸
외 2명
한국자동차공학회 춘계학술대회
2013
.05
막스 드보르작 : 정신사로서의 미술사
박정기
미술사논단
1997
.10
신미술사 vs. 시각문화연구 : T.J. 클락과 키스 먹시의 미술사론 비교연구
강미정
서양미술사학회논문집
2011
.08
스베트라나 앨퍼스, 『묘사의 미술: 17세기 네덜란드 미술』, Svetlana Alpers, The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century(Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1983)
김소희
서양미술사학회논문집
2011
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-609-001267458