지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2003.12
- 수록면
- 119 - 146 (28page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This essay is the last part of my project, entitled "Jacques Lacan, Dialoguing with Melanie Klein." It deals with analytic technique and interpretation in Klein and Lacan.
In the essay, I approach the discussion of this subject from a theoretical point of transference interpretation(Klein) or transference work(Lacan) and then illustrate it with a small clinical vignette(Mr. S case). The result of my study is as follows;
(1) Words constitute the basic vehicle of the psychoanalytic situation: they are the means by which a symptom and its underlying structure are analysed, and as a result they are at the heart of the question of interpretation.
(2) For both Klein and Lacan, chains of signifying terms, and more particularly, the networks constructed by their intersections, form the material within which interpretation operates. The correctness of an interpretation is judged by whether or not it facilitates the production of more material, not by whether it has other effects on the analysand, whether the analysand refuses it or agrees to it, or whether the analyst is pleased with it. That is, it is effective if it overcomes to some extent the resistance.
(3) The main difference in Klein is that she believes that words are accessible and that they lead to meanings fairly directly, and that analyst can interpret anxiety from the beginning. For Lacan the idea of a symbolic equation is replaced by a more structured field of symbolism and this is totally unanswered in Klein’'s school, where it is assumed that you can rely on the ego and commonsense.
(4) I concluded that one of the criticisms that Lacan was made of Klein, while he evidently respected her work, had to do with his view that she worked mainly in the field of the Imaginary, possibly introducing the Symbolic Register but without realizing it. Lacan asserted that Klein's work centered on the Imaginary and he equated Kleinian transference interpretation with a sort of paranoia centered on the analyst.
(5) But if one considers Klein in the light of the developments of Bion and Segal, one could say that the capacity to think, that is, the capacity to identify the patients’' anxieties, register their projection onto the analyst, and then put them into the words, is a complex phenomenon, not dissimilar to the capacity to see the object as a separate whole object who can relate to another separate whole object in the oedipal triangle.
In the essay, I approach the discussion of this subject from a theoretical point of transference interpretation(Klein) or transference work(Lacan) and then illustrate it with a small clinical vignette(Mr. S case). The result of my study is as follows;
(1) Words constitute the basic vehicle of the psychoanalytic situation: they are the means by which a symptom and its underlying structure are analysed, and as a result they are at the heart of the question of interpretation.
(2) For both Klein and Lacan, chains of signifying terms, and more particularly, the networks constructed by their intersections, form the material within which interpretation operates. The correctness of an interpretation is judged by whether or not it facilitates the production of more material, not by whether it has other effects on the analysand, whether the analysand refuses it or agrees to it, or whether the analyst is pleased with it. That is, it is effective if it overcomes to some extent the resistance.
(3) The main difference in Klein is that she believes that words are accessible and that they lead to meanings fairly directly, and that analyst can interpret anxiety from the beginning. For Lacan the idea of a symbolic equation is replaced by a more structured field of symbolism and this is totally unanswered in Klein’'s school, where it is assumed that you can rely on the ego and commonsense.
(4) I concluded that one of the criticisms that Lacan was made of Klein, while he evidently respected her work, had to do with his view that she worked mainly in the field of the Imaginary, possibly introducing the Symbolic Register but without realizing it. Lacan asserted that Klein's work centered on the Imaginary and he equated Kleinian transference interpretation with a sort of paranoia centered on the analyst.
(5) But if one considers Klein in the light of the developments of Bion and Segal, one could say that the capacity to think, that is, the capacity to identify the patients’' anxieties, register their projection onto the analyst, and then put them into the words, is a complex phenomenon, not dissimilar to the capacity to see the object as a separate whole object who can relate to another separate whole object in the oedipal triangle.
목차
序. - “말하기 방식이 주체의 ‘위치‘ 변화를 유도 … “
1. 클라인의 전이해석
2. 사례제시
3. 라깡 (학파)의 비판
結 - “분석치료는 상상적 관계의 분해이자 상징적 관계의 부각 … “
인용문헌
「Abstract」
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
클라인과 라깡의 대화(3) : 성(Sexuality)
현대정신분석
2002 .12
-
멜라니 클라인 정신분석과 아동정신분석의 역사 : 클라인과 안나 프로이트를 중심으로
현대정신분석
2004 .08
-
캐나다 시인 클라인과 영미 모더니즘
신영어영문학
2005 .11
-
클라인과 라깡의 대화(1) : 무의식의 개념화
현대정신분석
1999 .12
-
사물과 죽음의 기억 : 클라인의 예술론
현대정신분석
2008 .12
-
안전감 경험으로서의 신앙교육 연구 - 클라인(Melanie Klein)의 대상 관계 이론을 중심으로 -
신학연구
2003 .12
-
자끄 라깡의 임상정신분석 : 〈디킨대학〉 및 〈멜버른 라깡 서클〉에서의 연구경험을 중심으로
현대정신분석
2004 .12
-
라깡과 법, 그리고 진리
현대정신분석
2002 .12
-
Poe, Lacan, and Feminism : Woman=Symptom=Mother
신영어영문학
2006 .02
-
공리주의 비판담론으로서의 정신분석의 윤리 : 프로이트, 라깡, 클라인을 중심으로
현대정신분석
2014 .08
-
Kant after Lacan : Object, Subject, and the Aesthetic
한국현대정신분석학회 학술발표대회 프로시딩
2005 .11
-
Freud, Lacan and Japan
한국현대정신분석학회 학술발표대회 프로시딩
2005 .03
-
멜라니 클라인의 대상관계이론 관점에서 본 놀이치료 임상사례 연구
목회와 상담
2015 .01
-
한국에 라캉이 도입되는 과정에 관한 이해 : 『현대시사상』(1989.12.–1997.3.)을 중심으로
현대정신분석
2020 .02
-
클라인의 초기 오이디푸스와 여성성 : 초적 여성성과 다른 향유
현대정신분석
2007 .08
-
조이스와 라깡의 숫자 4
제임스조이스 저널
2007 .01
-
라캉과 조이스--증상으로서의 글쓰기
제임스조이스 저널
2006 .01
-
클라인의 '우울적 위치'와 그 정신분석적 고찰 : 애도와 회복을 통한 주체의 탄생
현대정신분석
2004 .12
-
텍스트에 대한 라캉적 태도와 그 설천 : 「벤 벌벤 아래에서」에 나타난 “오브제 쁘띠 아”
새한영어영문학
2002 .06
-
클라인과 라깡의 대화(2) : 상징형성과 상징계
현대정신분석
2000 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-185-015585578