지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Cheoyong(處容) has been known as a mysterious person who was born as a son of Dragon of East Sea(東海龍) and became a courtier after following King Hungang(憲康王) to Unified Shilla Capital Kyongju in the 9th century.
Several studies have focused on the identity of Cheoyong. Some suggested Cheoyong as a shaman, or as a son of a country elite family in east Shilla, or, more interestingly, as an Arab merchant who had arrived in eastern sea of Shilla. But these studies has not yet showed any full supportive proofs.
King Hungang had an only son named Yo(嶢), who later became King Hyogong(孝恭王). Yo was a child of King Hungang with a country woman known as only Kim(金) in his trip to the area near the eastern sea. But 'Cheoyong Story' in Samgukusa(三國遺事) tells us that East Sea Dragon sent Cheoyong with a great respect to King Hungang who had yet no son and King Hungang built a temple for East Sea Dragon and named it Manghaesa(望海寺). And the story tells that the temple has another name Shinbangsa(新房寺) which means that the temple was 'the place in which bride and bridegroom spent their first bridal night.' That name sounds inappropriate for temple and makes us wonder and ask why it has that strange name. The name is just a proof that King Hungang and the country woman had spent their first night in this place and from this relationship Cheoyong, who is supposed to be Yo was born. And King Hungang built the temple Manghaesa or Shinbangsa as a memorial near the area nowadays known as Ulsan(蔚山). But Yo was an illegitimate son and could not inherit the kingdom. In those times Shill a East Sea Dragon was worshipped as a god to protect the country, so the story was spread among the people that East Sea Dragon gave a son Cheoyong(Yo) to King Hungang to succeed his kingdom.
'Cheoyong Story' tells us that Cheoyong(Yo) is a son of East Sea Dragon and has a sacred power to defeat the spirit of small pox. And the story has become a myth for his succession as King Hyogong.
Several studies have focused on the identity of Cheoyong. Some suggested Cheoyong as a shaman, or as a son of a country elite family in east Shilla, or, more interestingly, as an Arab merchant who had arrived in eastern sea of Shilla. But these studies has not yet showed any full supportive proofs.
King Hungang had an only son named Yo(嶢), who later became King Hyogong(孝恭王). Yo was a child of King Hungang with a country woman known as only Kim(金) in his trip to the area near the eastern sea. But 'Cheoyong Story' in Samgukusa(三國遺事) tells us that East Sea Dragon sent Cheoyong with a great respect to King Hungang who had yet no son and King Hungang built a temple for East Sea Dragon and named it Manghaesa(望海寺). And the story tells that the temple has another name Shinbangsa(新房寺) which means that the temple was 'the place in which bride and bridegroom spent their first bridal night.' That name sounds inappropriate for temple and makes us wonder and ask why it has that strange name. The name is just a proof that King Hungang and the country woman had spent their first night in this place and from this relationship Cheoyong, who is supposed to be Yo was born. And King Hungang built the temple Manghaesa or Shinbangsa as a memorial near the area nowadays known as Ulsan(蔚山). But Yo was an illegitimate son and could not inherit the kingdom. In those times Shill a East Sea Dragon was worshipped as a god to protect the country, so the story was spread among the people that East Sea Dragon gave a son Cheoyong(Yo) to King Hungang to succeed his kingdom.
'Cheoyong Story' tells us that Cheoyong(Yo) is a son of East Sea Dragon and has a sacred power to defeat the spirit of small pox. And the story has become a myth for his succession as King Hyogong.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 『三國遺事』 處容郞望海寺條의 분석
3. 處容의 역사적 실체
4. 處容說話의 성격
5. 맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
고려 <처용가>의 새로운 분석과 해석
한국문학논총
2005 .01
-
처용 탈의 변모 양상에 관한 통시적 고찰
한국민속학
2001 .12
-
김소진의 <처용단장>을 중심으로 살펴 본 처용 담론의 이데올로기 연구
국어국문학
2013 .12
-
신라의 오방 관념과 〈처용가〉 형성 과정의 한 단서 : 신라 동악 토함산의 상징성과 그 변천을 고려하여
우리말글
2017 .12
-
『쿠쉬나메』와 『삼국유사』를 통해 본 처용설화의 생성공간
동서비교문학저널
2015 .04
-
觀相으로 본 『악학궤범』의 處容 형상
한국사상과 문화
2009 .01
-
처용가연구(處容歌硏究)
국어국문학
1980 .04
-
水路와 處容, 그리고 新羅 설화의 바다
韓國古典硏究
2012 .01
-
처용 무당설 및 아랍인설의 해석학적 오류 처용설화의 철학적 연구 (1)
철학연구
2008 .12
-
신라 「처용가」의 새로운 고찰
한글
2008 .06
-
處容郞 望海寺의 社會史的 性格
어문론집
2001 .12
-
처용설화의 정치신학적 해석 - 처용사건의 맥락사에 대한 철학적 이해 -
철학논총
2019 .07
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
-
역사를 통해 본 한국인들 생활 속의 東海
역사와실학
2011 .08
-
〈遇賊歌〉의 滑稽와 〈處容歌〉의 寬容 : 新羅 下代의 調和 지향과 鄕歌의 작품세계
국어문학
2005 .12
-
한국 민화의 시작, 처용문배(處容門排)
강좌 미술사
2010 .01
-
처용가(處容歌) 신석(新釋)
국어국문학
1979 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-015490559