지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article is about the characters and changes of ‘Koshin and Sachup’, the personnel document in 15th century.
Koshin included the letter of appointment by the King. According to the level of position, it was called ‘Kwankyo’ for the forth level and above, and called ‘Kyochup’ the fifth and below. In the old documents, Kwankyo had used ‘Wangji’ since Koryo dynasty, but changed to ‘Kyoji’ during King Sejong’s reign and settled in ‘Kyoungkukdaejun’. Especially it was different from Koryo’s that was issued with out Seokyoung, the identity and reference inspection. This difference was considered as the result of political situation that the royal authority was significantly increased. Kyochup had been the form of ‘Yi(byoung) Jososhin.... Gyebongwangji’ (ministers of personnel department and defence department got Wangji form the King), but changed ‘Yi(Byouong) Jo Bongkyo’, (ministers of personnel department and defence department got the King’s order) remarkably brief form. The former was the form that recorded the process of recommendations for appointment or promotion by the bureaucratic cabinet, but the later omitted the process and recorded only the results that the King gave the order. This change to the brief form emphasized the King’s order and authority.
If someone got Koshin, he should serve the position that was appointed by the King, even before he passed Seokyoung, the identity and reference inspection, because the King’s appointment was considered as the grant of government position. Koshin was also used the legal document for his salary, but he could get the stipend only after he passed Seokyoung. So Koshin was the document served as basis of government officers’ life.
The officers that passed Seokyoung got ‘Sachup’ as well as Koshin. Sachup was issued by department of personnel and department of defence. Originally it was issed by Joongchuwon in Koryo dynasty, but in the latter department of personnel and department of defence took over it for remedying abuses and corruptions and rational management. Chosun succeeded to this system, and it is evaluated as the development of bureaucratic system.
The basic material of Sachup was ‘Kwan of Sahunbu’ reporting the pass of Seokyoung. So Schup contained the character that informed the officer who passed Seokyoung. So far, Kyocup and Sachup were understood as the same document, but they have different characters. Kyochup was issued by the King’s order. In the other hand, Sachup was issued by Kwan of Sahunbu.
Sachup was issued in ‘Kwan, Kochup and Chup’, 3 different kinds of forms, which was far more systematic form. And department of personnel and department of defence must issue Sachup when they got Kwan of Sahunbu
As you see, Koshin and Sachup which were the personnel documents in 15th century had completely different characters. These documents had existed since Koryo dynasty, but in 15th century, they took off the Koryo’s form. They settled in Chosun’s political system reflecting the change to brief form, systematic organization, advanced bureaucracy, and King’s influence.
Koshin included the letter of appointment by the King. According to the level of position, it was called ‘Kwankyo’ for the forth level and above, and called ‘Kyochup’ the fifth and below. In the old documents, Kwankyo had used ‘Wangji’ since Koryo dynasty, but changed to ‘Kyoji’ during King Sejong’s reign and settled in ‘Kyoungkukdaejun’. Especially it was different from Koryo’s that was issued with out Seokyoung, the identity and reference inspection. This difference was considered as the result of political situation that the royal authority was significantly increased. Kyochup had been the form of ‘Yi(byoung) Jososhin.... Gyebongwangji’ (ministers of personnel department and defence department got Wangji form the King), but changed ‘Yi(Byouong) Jo Bongkyo’, (ministers of personnel department and defence department got the King’s order) remarkably brief form. The former was the form that recorded the process of recommendations for appointment or promotion by the bureaucratic cabinet, but the later omitted the process and recorded only the results that the King gave the order. This change to the brief form emphasized the King’s order and authority.
If someone got Koshin, he should serve the position that was appointed by the King, even before he passed Seokyoung, the identity and reference inspection, because the King’s appointment was considered as the grant of government position. Koshin was also used the legal document for his salary, but he could get the stipend only after he passed Seokyoung. So Koshin was the document served as basis of government officers’ life.
The officers that passed Seokyoung got ‘Sachup’ as well as Koshin. Sachup was issued by department of personnel and department of defence. Originally it was issed by Joongchuwon in Koryo dynasty, but in the latter department of personnel and department of defence took over it for remedying abuses and corruptions and rational management. Chosun succeeded to this system, and it is evaluated as the development of bureaucratic system.
The basic material of Sachup was ‘Kwan of Sahunbu’ reporting the pass of Seokyoung. So Schup contained the character that informed the officer who passed Seokyoung. So far, Kyocup and Sachup were understood as the same document, but they have different characters. Kyochup was issued by the King’s order. In the other hand, Sachup was issued by Kwan of Sahunbu.
Sachup was issued in ‘Kwan, Kochup and Chup’, 3 different kinds of forms, which was far more systematic form. And department of personnel and department of defence must issue Sachup when they got Kwan of Sahunbu
As you see, Koshin and Sachup which were the personnel documents in 15th century had completely different characters. These documents had existed since Koryo dynasty, but in 15th century, they took off the Koryo’s form. They settled in Chosun’s political system reflecting the change to brief form, systematic organization, advanced bureaucracy, and King’s influence.
목차
머리말
1. 고신(告身)의 양식과 발급 성격
2. 사첩(謝牒)의 양식과 문서 성격
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
여성의 몸과 노동, 그리고 민주주의 : 1970년대 수기와 소설에 드러난 정동을 중심으로
한국현대문학연구
2018 .04
-
고려후기 인사행정과 인사문서에 대한 비판적 검토
한국사연구
2013 .09
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
-
고려사 소재 대금(對金) 외교문서의 특징
석당논총
2013 .01
-
『리차드 2세』: 왕의 말과 왕의 트라우마, 그리고 왕권
신영어영문학
2013 .11
-
고려 충혜왕의 행적과 정치적 입장
한국인물사연구
2010 .03
-
조선시대 국왕호칭의 종류와 의미
역사와경계
2004 .09
-
체육계열 학과 정체성의 몇 가지 성찰
인문과학연구
2012 .08
-
조선시대 왕의 이중적 재현 : 인조대를 중심으로
한국학연구
2012 .03
-
<용비어천가>의 六祖 서술 양상 고찰
어문연구
2018 .01
-
功臣號를 통해 본 高麗王國 冊封
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2000 .06
-
淺析臺灣大專院校‘中文系’與‘國文系’科系名稱之比較
중국어문학논집
2018 .10
-
고구려의 ‘中原 地域’ 진출에 대한 小考
고구려발해연구
2015 .03
-
아로니아(Aronia melanocarpa)로부터 유래한 추출물의 항산화 및 항알레르기 효능
한국식품영양과학회지
2008 .09
-
중원고구려비의 건립 목적과 신라의 위상
한국사학보
2013 .05
-
기업의 사회적 책임에 대한 국제적 논의와 법적 과제
동아법학
2011 .11
-
羅濟同盟에 관한 硏究
한국사연구
1984 .09
-
소셜 미디어시대의 가치마케팅 전략
문화산업연구
2011 .08
-
韓國 古典籍 標點의 現況과 課題
민족문화
2010 .07
-
金石文에 보이는 高句麗의 年號
한국사학보
1998 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-015474449