메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와현실 제58권
발행연도
2005.12
수록면
119 - 147 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The word 'Pacific Ocean' is a term by the Western world. Therefore the word has been representing certain thinking patterns and the apparent hegemony of the Europeans and Americans. The organization of Institute of Pacific Relations(IPR) also bears the same sprit. The U.S. intellectuals who organized this body during the mid-1920s considered the Asian region to be the extension of the Pacific ocean or even part of that. IPR pursuited two things: First, through the academic studies and researches of the IPR, they hoped to obtain systematic knowledge and information regarding the situation of the Asian-Pacific regions. Secondly, they wanted to be able to utilize the Pacific Conferences held by the IPR every once in two or three years as a channel of civilian diplomacy and negotiations.
The Korean intellectuals, on the other hand, who were under the imperial occupation of Japan during this time, tried to inform the international society of the Korean situation and the Korean 'issues' through the IPR. The U.S. intellectuals hoped to establish a relationship with the intellectuals inside Korea. In November 1925, a branch of IPR was established in Seoul. But due to the pressure from the Japanese authorities, the branch was dismantled in 1931.
After December 1941, when the Pacific War broke out, IPR embarked upon active studies and researches of the Korean situation. As a result, Korea for the Koreans(1943), Modern Korea(1944), and Korea Looks Ahead(1944) were published. In these books, it was argued that only the immediate liberation of Korea could contribute to securing world peace and establishing stability throughout East Asia. It should be noted that the opinion maintained in these books was considerably different from those maintained by the American government and the U.S. media, which rather opted for a solution to the Korean issues based upon the trusteeship.

목차

머리말

1. 태평양문제연구회의 설립 목적

2. 태평양회의와 ‘한국대표‘의 출석문제

3. 태평양전쟁기의 한국문제 인식

맺음말

부록

Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-015220034