지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
We can't deny Korean EE has basically developed on the basis of Environmental Possibilism (Environmental management or Reformism) in lots of aspects. I would show three representative proofs here, the first, the philosophy of Korean EE has been mainly focused on dichotomy of human-techno centrism and eco-centrism with no considering other alternative environmentalism since 4th Formal Curriculum, 1981. The second, simultaneously, the concept of EE has not distinguished from it of Science education. (Furthermore, unfortunately some says EE has been a part of Science education, although there should be many differences on its contextual aspect.) And the third one is that the limit of possibilism which market economists have worried, has scarcely mentioned in various kinds of EE-related teaching materials.
Possibilism is basically likely to be accompanied by science and economics-oriented approach, and in this aspect this dichotomy, human-techno centrism and eco-centrism, has come from perspectives of Economical development process and over-addicted belief to Science. So it is enough to say that Korean EE has basically developed with biased to Environmental Possibilism, in other words, biased to preference to it. And I'll critically focus on these two axes of possibilism, Science and Economics and its dichotomy.
Of course, we should accept there are so many same parts in its contents between EE and Science, but we should know its contextual differences for triangular position of environmentalism suitable to EE and also overcome science-dependant approach to EE. Although science-dependant approach to EE and dichotomy could provide some tools for clearing up the causes of environmental problem, especially always it has insisted fundamental causes of environmental problem originated in human faults and over-use of eco-source or over-economic development, but now it is old-fashioned discourse, furthermore it come to have unavoidable limits in the debates of problem-solving mechanism to environmental problems. The paramount important thing is to supply the ways or thoughtful mechanism for solving or coordinating the Environmental problems, not just searching for cause of it. But scientific approach and its dichotomy based on possibilism have continuously born cause & effect in EE-related discourse. So there are so much needs to transfer from continuous bearing of cause & effect to constructive alternatives at least in environmentalism of EE.
Traditionally, dichotomical division in EE Environmentalism, human-techno centrism and eco-centrism, couldn't have provided any answers to our real society, it just gives us only cause & effects of Environmental problems. And also we can't find the description on the limits of capitalism market approach to Environmental problems especially in Korean EE text books, other teaching materials and its teaching-learning process, although market approach economist has been proved its fault beyond its functional merits as Environmental management tools.
So we should introduce other alternative Environmental philosophy instead of Possibilism such as eco-socialism insisted by Schmacher M. and Boochin etc, or marxist-environmentalism for relative and comparative views to market-thought such as commodification. In this aspect we need to accept Oriental philosophy based on moderation(中庸) as new another alternatives with the reflection that we have recognized monism as representative Oriental philosophical environmentalism. Fundamentally monism has done its role with providing relative concepts to Dichotomy Enlightenment, but we can't say it has been core concept for understanding of oriental environmentalism, and we can't distinguish monism from oriental philosophy itself, just because oriental thought itself was basically monism.
So conceptual difference should be recognized between EE and Science education in teaching-learning process on the basis of life-philosophy(Philosophie des Lebens) from epistemology. For this transformation, we should introduce existentialism in Science education, in other words, only existential Science education based on phenomenology or interpretivism can be EE. And simultaneously we need some ways for overcoming of scientific foundationalism which has been tradition making science not stand on existentialism, formulating and featuring of almost all of natural things and its phenomenon from after enlightenment in western world, but it has malfunctioned in fixing conception of science just into essentialism itself. And we also introduce integrated approach to science and society for EE like STS. Those are ways for overcoming of Environmental possibilism in EE.
Possibilism is basically likely to be accompanied by science and economics-oriented approach, and in this aspect this dichotomy, human-techno centrism and eco-centrism, has come from perspectives of Economical development process and over-addicted belief to Science. So it is enough to say that Korean EE has basically developed with biased to Environmental Possibilism, in other words, biased to preference to it. And I'll critically focus on these two axes of possibilism, Science and Economics and its dichotomy.
Of course, we should accept there are so many same parts in its contents between EE and Science, but we should know its contextual differences for triangular position of environmentalism suitable to EE and also overcome science-dependant approach to EE. Although science-dependant approach to EE and dichotomy could provide some tools for clearing up the causes of environmental problem, especially always it has insisted fundamental causes of environmental problem originated in human faults and over-use of eco-source or over-economic development, but now it is old-fashioned discourse, furthermore it come to have unavoidable limits in the debates of problem-solving mechanism to environmental problems. The paramount important thing is to supply the ways or thoughtful mechanism for solving or coordinating the Environmental problems, not just searching for cause of it. But scientific approach and its dichotomy based on possibilism have continuously born cause & effect in EE-related discourse. So there are so much needs to transfer from continuous bearing of cause & effect to constructive alternatives at least in environmentalism of EE.
Traditionally, dichotomical division in EE Environmentalism, human-techno centrism and eco-centrism, couldn't have provided any answers to our real society, it just gives us only cause & effects of Environmental problems. And also we can't find the description on the limits of capitalism market approach to Environmental problems especially in Korean EE text books, other teaching materials and its teaching-learning process, although market approach economist has been proved its fault beyond its functional merits as Environmental management tools.
So we should introduce other alternative Environmental philosophy instead of Possibilism such as eco-socialism insisted by Schmacher M. and Boochin etc, or marxist-environmentalism for relative and comparative views to market-thought such as commodification. In this aspect we need to accept Oriental philosophy based on moderation(中庸) as new another alternatives with the reflection that we have recognized monism as representative Oriental philosophical environmentalism. Fundamentally monism has done its role with providing relative concepts to Dichotomy Enlightenment, but we can't say it has been core concept for understanding of oriental environmentalism, and we can't distinguish monism from oriental philosophy itself, just because oriental thought itself was basically monism.
So conceptual difference should be recognized between EE and Science education in teaching-learning process on the basis of life-philosophy(Philosophie des Lebens) from epistemology. For this transformation, we should introduce existentialism in Science education, in other words, only existential Science education based on phenomenology or interpretivism can be EE. And simultaneously we need some ways for overcoming of scientific foundationalism which has been tradition making science not stand on existentialism, formulating and featuring of almost all of natural things and its phenomenon from after enlightenment in western world, but it has malfunctioned in fixing conception of science just into essentialism itself. And we also introduce integrated approach to science and society for EE like STS. Those are ways for overcoming of Environmental possibilism in EE.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 환경관의 지향점 - 문제 해결 기제로의 전환-
Ⅲ. 과학교육과 환경교육의 개념구분
Ⅳ. 결론
〈참고 문헌〉
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
탐구 중심 환경교육의 개념과 의미
환경교육
2006 .04
-
환경교육 교재의 적합성 분석
환경교육
2003 .12
-
일본의 기업 환경교육 연구 동향에 관한 고찰
환경교육
2010 .03
-
환경교육에 대한 교사의 신념과 실제 프로그램의 차이
환경교육
2003 .12
-
초등 7차 교과서의 환경교육적 내용 분석 및 초등환경교육 체계화를 위한 학교 교육과정 개발 방안 : 환경교육을 위한 환경학의 관점에서
환경교육
2013 .06
-
실과교과서 환경 관련 단원의 현장 적용 방안
실과교육연구
2003 .01
-
중등 교사와 학생의 환경 교육 교재에 대한 의견 분석
환경교육
2006 .04
-
중등 환경 교과서의 환경 소양 요소 분석
환경교육
2006 .12
-
제7차 초등학교 교육과정 교과서의 환경 관련 내용 분석
환경교육
2002 .07
-
환경교육 국제 협력과 상호학습을 통한 우리나라 환경교육의 제도와 정책 개선 방향 탐색
환경교육
2019 .12
-
중등학교 환경교과 선택현황에 기초한 환경교육 확산방안
환경교육
2004 .07
-
법인세율의 변화가 기업의 접대비지출에 미치는 영향
경영학연구
2008 .02
-
우리나라와 독일 대학 산림과학과 환경교육 교육과정 비교 연구
환경교육
2002 .12
-
환경교육적 탐구를 통한 유역 중심의 물 환경교육 교재화 연구 : 무심천 유역을 중심으로
환경교육
2008 .12
-
유역 개념을 중심으로 한 탐구 기반의 물 환경교육 모형에 관한 연구 : ENVISION 프로그램을 중심으로
환경교육
2006 .12
-
환경교육의 평가에 관한 연구 ( Investigation into the Evaluation in Environmental Education and the Evaluation Framework of EE Program )
환경교육
1999 .11
-
중등 환경 교과서와 10학년 과학 교과서의 공통 내용 분석
환경교육
2008 .09
-
국내·외 환경교육 논문 분석을 통한 연구 경향 비교
환경교육
2009 .12
-
중등학교 환경교과 선택 및 교사 임용율을 둘러싼 환경교육과정 운영 실태에 대한 연구
환경교육
2016 .09
-
환경교육에 대한 유치원 교사의 인식 : 목포지역 유치원을 중심으로
환경교육
2019 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
생태주의 환경관의 재구성을 통한 북미 원주민의 생태주의 환경관 분석과 환경교육적 시사점
박미화
,
김기대
환경교육
2009
.09
새로운 환경교육의 목표와 내용
김태경
,
이동엽
,
최석진
외 2명
한국환경교육학회 학술대회 자료집
2005
.08
기후변화교육 지도안 분석틀 개발을 위한 기초연구 : 실증주의, 해석주의, 사회적 비판주의를 중심으로
황상일
,
박병익
한국환경교육학회 학술대회 자료집
2016
.11
2022 개정 환경 교육과정의 개정 방향과 주요 내용
이선경
,
권영락
,
권혜선
외 12명
환경교육
2023
.09
'근본주의적 생태주의'에 대한 비판적 분석 : 김종철을 중심으로
김진석
철학연구
2012
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-370-015217132