메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
국어국문학회 국어국문학 국어국문학 제141권
발행연도
2005.12
수록면
283 - 313 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is rare case that treats ‘language' to the main subject of novel in Korean literature circles. This paper considered chiefly in Lee Chung-jun's fictional languages in philosophical way. Lee recognized the language as intermediate of representation and novelized the critical attitude. It needs various theory of language-philosophy to examine Lee's language-cognition. Lee's language-cognition has extensive implication with Oriental-Occidental linguistic issues, so it could be a perfect study for discovering his viewpoint of novel, art, and the world.
In Lee's work, the question of ‘language' processed as follows, ‘Is it possible to keep truly communication by corrupted language in corrupted period? (diagnosis on corrupted language & period)', ‘Is it possible to write novel with corrupted language? (matter of fictional representation)' and 'There can be an alternative method which can exceed these limitation? (trial to find alternative method)'. From these questions he could change his form of novel and also we can deduce his viewpoint of language and novel.
Lee's language-cognition composed of various discourses on language. He made turn to good account for his topic with ‘Arbitrariness and Difference' of Sassure and critic on corrupted language of Benjamin and Heidegger. The antagonistic relation, originated in Lee's language-cognition, is pursuits new unification gradually. And the critical works on modern viewpoint of language, especially to the instrumental point, are processing to find new language and in this location, Oriental, Heidegger and Benjamin thesis are sinking into. Lee changes Heidegger's “Language is house of Being” to “Being is house of Language” and the discourse from language to being. The agreement between language and things destructed by prevalence of the ‘Arbitrariness’ is composed to ‘agreement between being and language’ or 'agreement between language and life'.
Lee checked the limitation of modern viewpoint of language, and novelized the process of solving. so the tendency of his novels changed accordingly. This process of changing is not a simple subject because it caused by writer's continual questioning about language. The skeptical view on autobiographical novel which lost the ‘agreement between Being and Language’ because of the prevalence of ‘Arbitrariness’, connected to liberal argument of novel and anti-conflict. And the limitation of fictional language pursuits ‘agreement of Being, Language and Life’. The search for 'Existential language' changed to new formation which composed with ‘Storytelling’. When the argument on ‘liberty of novel’ presented with ‘door’, pursuits to being above the boundary of confliction, the ‘narrative side’ presented with ‘house’, implicated the trial for new unification. Lee's language-philosophical consideration aims at totally critique of modern speculation on language.

목차

1. 서론 : 언어 인식과 언어철학

2. 본론

3. 결론

참고문헌

Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-015184957