지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Matters related to the KiJaChoSun(箕子朝鮮), which is usually said to have immediately succeeded the DanKunChoSun, should be addressed properly because of their overlapping nature in terms of historical events with the Early-Era Kochosun.
First I analyzed several data from the Liaoning-styled Bronze-knives Culture of which traces or excavation sites were concentrated in the LiaoningSheng(遼寧省) area of China, and tried to identify the characteristics and residing groups of the region. As a result, I was able to confirm that KoJukKuk(孤竹國) or KiKuk(箕國), which were in a Southern position to the Liohe(遼河) and has been said to have been components of the KiJaChoSun, were resided by descendants of the Yin(殷) tribe under the supervision of Yen(燕) China, and were in fact small political entities consisted of normadic tribes like ShanYoong(山戎) etc.
So the theory of KiJa's coming to the Eastern regions seems not to have been based on facts from the era, but was only falsely devised by the Han(漢)-era Chinese historians, and the Bronze utensils found in the Liosi(遼西) area with the word 'KiHoo(箕侯)' scarved or painted on it only proves that people bearing the Shang heritage had indeed resided in the barbarian settlements in the Liosi area.
Hence theories arguing that the Bronze Utensil Culture in the Western area of Liohe dates back to B.C. 2C and it should be considered as primal part of the DanKunChoSun culture, can easily be refuted, in this writer's opinion.
First I analyzed several data from the Liaoning-styled Bronze-knives Culture of which traces or excavation sites were concentrated in the LiaoningSheng(遼寧省) area of China, and tried to identify the characteristics and residing groups of the region. As a result, I was able to confirm that KoJukKuk(孤竹國) or KiKuk(箕國), which were in a Southern position to the Liohe(遼河) and has been said to have been components of the KiJaChoSun, were resided by descendants of the Yin(殷) tribe under the supervision of Yen(燕) China, and were in fact small political entities consisted of normadic tribes like ShanYoong(山戎) etc.
So the theory of KiJa's coming to the Eastern regions seems not to have been based on facts from the era, but was only falsely devised by the Han(漢)-era Chinese historians, and the Bronze utensils found in the Liosi(遼西) area with the word 'KiHoo(箕侯)' scarved or painted on it only proves that people bearing the Shang heritage had indeed resided in the barbarian settlements in the Liosi area.
Hence theories arguing that the Bronze Utensil Culture in the Western area of Liohe dates back to B.C. 2C and it should be considered as primal part of the DanKunChoSun culture, can easily be refuted, in this writer's opinion.
목차
Ⅰ. 머 리 말
Ⅱ. 大凌河流域 殷周 靑銅禮器 교藏의 성격
Ⅲ. 중국계 流移民과 箕子朝鮮
Ⅳ. 맺 음 말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국학계의 ‘箕子朝鮮’ 연구와 그 비판에 대한 검토
고조선단군학
2012 .05
-
箕子朝鮮說의 사회학적 검증과 ‘犯禁8條’의 실체
고조선단군학
2013 .12
-
渤海沿岸 大凌河流域 箕子朝鮮의 遺蹟ㆍ遺物
한국고대사연구
1996 .11
-
李箕永 小説의 構造
인문과학연구
1990 .12
-
箕子新考
한국사연구
1983 .06
-
중국학계의 고조선연구 검토 : 동북공정 전후시기 연구를 중심으로
한국사학보
2006 .11
-
중국·일본의 ‘三韓’ 인식에 대한 재검토 : 신라 三韓一統意識의 성립 시기와 관련하여
목간과문자
2016 .12
-
임진왜란 시기 朝鮮ㆍ明관계와 箕子인식의 양상
한국사학보
2016 .11
-
조선 초기 對明事大論의 역사적 성격 검토
동양사학연구
2016 .06
-
기원전 10∼8세기 遼寧地域의 銅鏡 유형과 多鈕鏡의 출현
고조선단군학
2015 .06
-
신라의 鍮石 인식과 그 특징
한국고대사연구
2019 .12
-
Bronze Age Culture in Korea
Korea Journal
1974 .04
-
한국과 중국의 상고시대 문화교섭에 관한 고찰
고조선단군학
2003 .12
-
Bronze Age in Korea
Korea Journal
1984 .09
-
申箕善의 啓蒙千字文 연구
동방한문학
2019 .01
-
고조선 국가의 형성과 고조선 금속문화
고조선단군학
2009 .11
-
金文學 著書 書評 考察
중국문화연구
2017 .05
-
韓國 靑銅器文化의 史的考察
한국사연구
1971 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-017871819