지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Silla had unusually had Gyeongju as its capital for the whole one-thousand - year history. Only one trial was made to transfer the capital to Dalgubul during the reign of King Sironun, who ruled Unified Silla immediately after Silla's unification of Three Kingdoms. The trial of transferring the capital from Gyeongju to Dalgubul had a close connection with a political situation after Silla's unification of Three Kingdoms. Kim Hum - dol Rebellion occurred at the beginning of King Sinmun's reign, which expressed true - born aristocrats' complaints against King Sinmun's policies. Though the rebellion was defeated, their complaints remained. King Sirmun's trial of the transfer was made in this situation.
King Sinmun's trial ended in failure around at the 9th year of his reign (in A.D. 689). This trial was believed to be made first during the reign of King Sinmon but it actually turned out that the trial was first made at the later period of King Munrou's reign. The job of the transfer was set about in earnest about at the 6th year of King Simnun's reign (in 686) when the nine- chu -and - five - secondary - capital- system had been established completely. Dalgubul was considered to be a candidate for the new capital. This project was planned by Chipsabu and a central role in planning the transfer played by Chungsi.
Dalgubul was chosen to be a candidate for the new capital not only because it satisfied geographical conditions but it also had advantages to achieve the purposes of the transfer. While the transfer began to be conducted, it was opposed strongly by true - born aristocrats, who was worrying that they might lose the bases of their power. The transfer was being conducted for a short period, i.e" for four years, and the trial of the transfer ended in failure due to strong objections.
Owing to the failure of King Simnun's trial, the royal families of the middle period of Unified Silla not only failed to escape from the influence of the true - born aristocracy but also failed to set up new national iconography, The failure of King Sinmun's trial left various types of aftermath to the political situations of Unified Silla, The issue of the transfer is also meaningful in the sense that it is an example not for success but for failure in the history of ancient Korea,
King Sinmun's trial ended in failure around at the 9th year of his reign (in A.D. 689). This trial was believed to be made first during the reign of King Sinmon but it actually turned out that the trial was first made at the later period of King Munrou's reign. The job of the transfer was set about in earnest about at the 6th year of King Simnun's reign (in 686) when the nine- chu -and - five - secondary - capital- system had been established completely. Dalgubul was considered to be a candidate for the new capital. This project was planned by Chipsabu and a central role in planning the transfer played by Chungsi.
Dalgubul was chosen to be a candidate for the new capital not only because it satisfied geographical conditions but it also had advantages to achieve the purposes of the transfer. While the transfer began to be conducted, it was opposed strongly by true - born aristocrats, who was worrying that they might lose the bases of their power. The transfer was being conducted for a short period, i.e" for four years, and the trial of the transfer ended in failure due to strong objections.
Owing to the failure of King Simnun's trial, the royal families of the middle period of Unified Silla not only failed to escape from the influence of the true - born aristocracy but also failed to set up new national iconography, The failure of King Sinmun's trial left various types of aftermath to the political situations of Unified Silla, The issue of the transfer is also meaningful in the sense that it is an example not for success but for failure in the history of ancient Korea,
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 문제의 소재
Ⅲ. 신문왕의 즉위와 정치세력
Ⅳ. 달구벌 천도 기도와 실패
Ⅴ. 맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
古代 遷都의 역사적 의미
한국고대사연구
2004 .12
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
-
新羅 哀莊王代의 政治變動과 金彦昇
한국고대사연구
2004 .06
-
신라 중고기 영토 확장과 정치집단의 역동적 대응
역사학연구
2020 .01
-
新羅末期의 王土思想과 社會變動
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2006 .03
-
『리차드 2세』: 왕의 말과 왕의 트라우마, 그리고 왕권
신영어영문학
2013 .11
-
조선시대 왕의 이중적 재현 : 인조대를 중심으로
한국학연구
2012 .03
-
高句麗 嬰陽王代의 新羅攻擊과 國內政治
한국사연구
2012 .06
-
백제의 천도
한국고대사연구
2004 .12
-
상처받은 신라 : 이종욱, ≪상처받은 신라－그 안에 한국인 정체성의 원점이 있다≫, 서강대학교 출판부, 2016
신라사학보
2018 .12
-
[논문]통일신라의 천하관과 대일(對日) 인식
역사와현실
2005 .06
-
삼국통일 전후 신라 도성의 공간 구조 변화
역사비평
2019 .08
-
The Horak Debate from the Reign of King Sukjong to King Sunjo
Korea Journal
2011 .03
-
4~5世紀 高句麗의 南方進出과 對新羅 關係
고구려발해연구
2012 .11
-
신라 中代의 唐 사신 영접 절차와 운용
한국사연구
2011 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-014535950