지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Of course, Hanjeon, Samgukji apparently may appear to be a record system of Han-Jinhan-Byeonjin-Byeonjin, However the record of Hanjeon, Samgukkji can be considered as a system in which the section of record cannot be divided by their mere original names and actually it is a record system of Mahan-Jinhan-Byeonjinhan-Byeonjin. In addition Hanjeon, Samgukji apparently may be considered as very much absurd in the composition of record. But since record of Hanjeon has the system in which Mahan and Byeonjinhan are recorded in corresponding manner, Haryeon may really be said to be consistent on comprehensive and organic structure and composion of recording.
Meanwhile, Hanjeon, Samgukji may be said as conveying seemingly very absurd the article contents and recording. Nevertheless since it had concerned with the purpose of corresponding articles between Mahan and Byeonjinhan, Hanjeon, Samgukji actually stuck to the fonnat system, the result of that, making itself a very unintelligible record. Also scattered notes of Weirak quoted in Hanwon have both similarities, dissimilarities with Hanjeon, Samgukji, it is noticeable that above interpretation is possible when we conjecture through the record of Weirak in Hanwon. It is seem that we may trace the process of a full account of Hanjeon, Samgukji with the help of Weirak, Hanwon.
Perhaps wouldn't it be better for us to perceive the recording of Hanjeon, Samgukji as having its own peculiarity? While appeared seemingly with some discrepancies in its format system, the record of Hanjeon. Samgukji actually has kept its consistency of format, the results of that raise in some problems in its contents of the articles. While we may affirm that Hanjeon, Samgukji is an history book in which the editor's intent is very largely reflected, but we may also recognize it as had been recorded with its original materials kept intact as long as it was possible. With this the researcher was able to present opinion on the Hanjeon, Samgukji. the prime material of Samhan.
Meanwhile, Hanjeon, Samgukji may be said as conveying seemingly very absurd the article contents and recording. Nevertheless since it had concerned with the purpose of corresponding articles between Mahan and Byeonjinhan, Hanjeon, Samgukji actually stuck to the fonnat system, the result of that, making itself a very unintelligible record. Also scattered notes of Weirak quoted in Hanwon have both similarities, dissimilarities with Hanjeon, Samgukji, it is noticeable that above interpretation is possible when we conjecture through the record of Weirak in Hanwon. It is seem that we may trace the process of a full account of Hanjeon, Samgukji with the help of Weirak, Hanwon.
Perhaps wouldn't it be better for us to perceive the recording of Hanjeon, Samgukji as having its own peculiarity? While appeared seemingly with some discrepancies in its format system, the record of Hanjeon. Samgukji actually has kept its consistency of format, the results of that raise in some problems in its contents of the articles. While we may affirm that Hanjeon, Samgukji is an history book in which the editor's intent is very largely reflected, but we may also recognize it as had been recorded with its original materials kept intact as long as it was possible. With this the researcher was able to present opinion on the Hanjeon, Samgukji. the prime material of Samhan.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 記錄 體裁의 問題
Ⅲ. 記事 內容의 問題
Ⅳ. 맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
三韓 起源과 遺俗의 問題
사학연구
2004 .03
-
중국사서로 본 弁辰과 慕韓 - 傳存文獻의 시대적 변용을 중심으로 -
한국고대사연구
2020 .09
-
三韓 起源과 ‘三韓’의 成立
한국사연구
2003 .09
-
국가기록관리 발전을 위한 정책 제안
역사비평
2012 .08
-
지역 기록물 관리기관 설립과 운영방향
역사와 담론
2001 .01
-
백제 온조왕대 영역확장에 대한 재검토 : 비류집단 복속과 ‘마한’ 국읍 병합을 중심으로
한국사학보
2013 .02
-
西浦 金萬重의 三國志 評說
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2000 .09
-
『삼국사기』 천문 기록의 재검토: 중국 사서(史書) 의존성 기록을 중심으로
한국과학사학회지
2020 .01
-
1881년 조사시찰단(朝士視察團)문견 기록의 글쓰기 양상
열상고전연구
2018 .01
-
『三國志』 韓條의‘草屋土室’에 대한 一考察
중앙고고연구
2012 .01
-
장서각 소장 한글 실기 문학 연구 : 선부군언행유사, 고씨효절록, 병자록을 중심으로
장서각
2001 .08
-
진한의 범위에 대한 재검토
한국고대사연구
2018 .09
-
원형의 기록화, 기록의 원형화 : 무형문화재의 기록
한국민속학
2006 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-014535490