지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since the prehistoric age, the relation partner of Guyaguk in the Gimhae was the Guju force, which had traditionally played a role as an international gateway of the Japanese archipelago. In the Geumgwangaya period, its gateway was replaced by the Ginai force. The Yangdong - ri force was declined and the Daeseong dong force emerged in such a process. Simultaneously, in the Japanese archipelago the north Yamato force and the Gawajji force rose into power, in the middle of the weakening of the force, based on the southeast region of the Nara basin. As shown in the above, we can know that the relation between the Korean peninsula and the Japanese archipelago played an important role in the shift of power in political regimes of the Geumgwangaya force and the Ginai force.
Goryeong - based Daegaya achieved epochal development in the late fifth century. That is, Daegaya expanded its force ranging from the Hwanggang hydrosphere to the Seomjingang and Geumgang hydrospheres. Besides, in this period, two facts are noted: One is that some forces relied on the relation with Geumgwangaya in Gimhae were decayed. Another is that those big chiefs who were connected with the Daegaya force appeared in many regions of Japan. These facts are supported by the prestigious artifacts of Daegaya style, which were found in the leading chiefs' tombs in the Japanese archipelago. Daegaya occupied a leading position in the relation with Wae, and this became motive power, which enabled it to dominate Geumgwangaya, Aragaya and Sogaya and to grow as a central state in the Gaya region.
Before and after 500, however, the importing country of material culture in the Japanese archipelago changed from Daegaya to Baekje, and hence Wae - originated material culture has extensively been found in the Yeongsanggang valley, which had a close relation to Baekje. The decadence in the relation with Wae was acted on as an important factor, which led Daegaya to decline and eventually, collapse.
In archeological data, it is assumed that the full - scale trade between Baekje and Wae became motive power for the appearance of the Gyeitai dynasty, based on the fact that the trade began before and after sixth century. The Gyeitai force gained predominance in Ginai by attempting to be different from the Gawajji force. This force excluded the Gaya force, which had traditionally had a close relation with the Japan archipelago, and introduced advanced material culture from Baekje.
It is believed that before and after this period, people buried in the keyhole - shaped tumuli in Jeollanam - do and Jeollabuk - do were members of the Wae descent group, which was dispatched by the Baekje kingship so as to dominate and restrain native forces and to capture Daegaya, given the construction period, distribution scope and funeral objects of the tumuli.
After the collapse of Hanseong, Baekje under the temporary downfall of its control organization received military help from Wae in order to rule over the south region and to capture Daegaya. It is inferred that, as a consideration of such help, Baekje transmitted Wae material culture necessary to national consolidation.
Goryeong - based Daegaya achieved epochal development in the late fifth century. That is, Daegaya expanded its force ranging from the Hwanggang hydrosphere to the Seomjingang and Geumgang hydrospheres. Besides, in this period, two facts are noted: One is that some forces relied on the relation with Geumgwangaya in Gimhae were decayed. Another is that those big chiefs who were connected with the Daegaya force appeared in many regions of Japan. These facts are supported by the prestigious artifacts of Daegaya style, which were found in the leading chiefs' tombs in the Japanese archipelago. Daegaya occupied a leading position in the relation with Wae, and this became motive power, which enabled it to dominate Geumgwangaya, Aragaya and Sogaya and to grow as a central state in the Gaya region.
Before and after 500, however, the importing country of material culture in the Japanese archipelago changed from Daegaya to Baekje, and hence Wae - originated material culture has extensively been found in the Yeongsanggang valley, which had a close relation to Baekje. The decadence in the relation with Wae was acted on as an important factor, which led Daegaya to decline and eventually, collapse.
In archeological data, it is assumed that the full - scale trade between Baekje and Wae became motive power for the appearance of the Gyeitai dynasty, based on the fact that the trade began before and after sixth century. The Gyeitai force gained predominance in Ginai by attempting to be different from the Gawajji force. This force excluded the Gaya force, which had traditionally had a close relation with the Japan archipelago, and introduced advanced material culture from Baekje.
It is believed that before and after this period, people buried in the keyhole - shaped tumuli in Jeollanam - do and Jeollabuk - do were members of the Wae descent group, which was dispatched by the Baekje kingship so as to dominate and restrain native forces and to capture Daegaya, given the construction period, distribution scope and funeral objects of the tumuli.
After the collapse of Hanseong, Baekje under the temporary downfall of its control organization received military help from Wae in order to rule over the south region and to capture Daegaya. It is inferred that, as a consideration of such help, Baekje transmitted Wae material culture necessary to national consolidation.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 3~4세기 韓半島와 日本列島의 文物交流
Ⅲ. 5세기 韓半島와 日本列島의 文物交流
Ⅳ. 6세기 韓半島와 日本列島의 文物交流
Ⅴ. 文物交流를 통해 본 古代 韓半島와 日本列島의 相互作用
Ⅵ. 맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
5-6세기 錦江上流 지역의 정치세력과 그 向方
대구사학
2012 .01
-
4~5세기 大加耶의 발전에 대한 고찰
한국고대사연구
2002 .06
-
渡倭한 百濟系 韓人과 河內 —百濟王族의 渡倭와 관련하여—
史叢(사총)
2009 .01
-
倭系石室로 본 加耶와 倭의 交流
대구사학
2019 .01
-
백제 사비시기 對倭外交와 使臣 파견의 양상
신라사학보
2018 .12
-
新羅의 大加耶 복속 과정에 대한 재검토
한국사연구
2011 .12
-
대가야 고대국가론
한국고대사연구
2017 .09
-
百濟 武王代의 對倭關係
한일관계사연구
2016 .04
-
湖南地域의 倭系資料와 前方後圓形古墳
헤리티지:역사와 과학
2018 .01
-
대가야 멸망 과정에 대한 새로운 이해 : ‘加耶叛’ 기사를 중심으로
한국고대사연구
2013 .12
-
논문:1945년 한반도에서 일본군의 '본토결전' 준비 - 편제와 병사노무동원을 중심으로 -
역사와현실
2003 .09
-
가야 諸國과 고구려의 관계
한국고대사연구
2020 .06
-
성왕 초기 가야 지역의 상황과 백제의 대응
한국사상과 문화
2010 .01
-
전남지역 마한과 가야 세력과의 관계변화와 의미
역사학연구
2019 .01
-
4~6세기 백제에서의 중국계 이주민의 정착과 활동
역사와현실
2020 .09
-
4~7세기 백제의 경계와 그 변화 -경기와 충청지역을 중심으로-
백제문화
2018 .01
-
<昌寧 眞興王拓境碑>와 신라의 영역 확장 : 大加耶정복을 중심으로
신라사학보
2012 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-014535016