지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
At the end of middle age, Bourgeoisie who engaged in commerce and manufacturing industry and gentry who managed their agricultural land by a new method that is said to be capitalism were gaining in strength economically.
As a concequence, they could compete with nobles politically.
Parliament was the stage of political competition between' nobles and commons.
In Tudor times, Parliament was subjected to the government of the king, and the king was the leader of nobles.
In Stuart Dinasty, parliament, especially the House of commons, took the direction of independence from the king.
Concequently, the House of commons which was composed of the repres entatives of the rich commons collided with the king and could be independent of the king.
Then, the king asserted the theory of divine rights of the king and tried to rationalize the absolute rights of the king.
In opposition to the king. parliament which was a political organ of rich commons, asserted their traditional rights based on the common laws.
Finally, a civil war broke out between the king and commons. It was called Puritan Revolution.
The war broke out for the cause of liberal rights of the people, but as a matter of fact, it was a political struggle between absolutism and liberalism.
During the armed confliction, the members of the House of commons who were the representatives of rich commons asserted the theory of social contract based on natural laws insisted of common laws.
The civil war resulted in the victory of Independent Party.
As the party interrupted the revolution on the way, so the revolutioil resulted in imperfection and compromisiny with old institution.
In other wards, it was true that the civil war was a revolution which was caused by Bourgeoisie, so it was Bourgeoisie Revolution, but as a Bourgeoisie revolution, it was too premature to be called the Bourgeoisie revolaition.
The sovereignty moved from the king to the parliament, and so we ('an say that Puritan Revolution played an important role in democratizing politics in England.
when the second civil war, what we call Grolious Revolution broke
out, the politics in England was almost democratized.
Democratization of politics was on the stage, what is called parliament. so the object of this thesis was to inquire into the achievements of the British parliament, especially concerned with Long Parliament.
As a concequence, they could compete with nobles politically.
Parliament was the stage of political competition between' nobles and commons.
In Tudor times, Parliament was subjected to the government of the king, and the king was the leader of nobles.
In Stuart Dinasty, parliament, especially the House of commons, took the direction of independence from the king.
Concequently, the House of commons which was composed of the repres entatives of the rich commons collided with the king and could be independent of the king.
Then, the king asserted the theory of divine rights of the king and tried to rationalize the absolute rights of the king.
In opposition to the king. parliament which was a political organ of rich commons, asserted their traditional rights based on the common laws.
Finally, a civil war broke out between the king and commons. It was called Puritan Revolution.
The war broke out for the cause of liberal rights of the people, but as a matter of fact, it was a political struggle between absolutism and liberalism.
During the armed confliction, the members of the House of commons who were the representatives of rich commons asserted the theory of social contract based on natural laws insisted of common laws.
The civil war resulted in the victory of Independent Party.
As the party interrupted the revolution on the way, so the revolutioil resulted in imperfection and compromisiny with old institution.
In other wards, it was true that the civil war was a revolution which was caused by Bourgeoisie, so it was Bourgeoisie Revolution, but as a Bourgeoisie revolution, it was too premature to be called the Bourgeoisie revolaition.
The sovereignty moved from the king to the parliament, and so we ('an say that Puritan Revolution played an important role in democratizing politics in England.
when the second civil war, what we call Grolious Revolution broke
out, the politics in England was almost democratized.
Democratization of politics was on the stage, what is called parliament. so the object of this thesis was to inquire into the achievements of the British parliament, especially concerned with Long Parliament.
목차
一. 序文
二. Tudor 王朝期의 議會
三. Stuart王朝의 專制政治와 議會
四. 請敎徒革命과 議會
五. 結語
Summary
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
淸敎徒革命에서 거둔 成果에 對한 硏究
역사와 담론
1979 .12
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
-
『리차드 2세』: 왕의 말과 왕의 트라우마, 그리고 왕권
신영어영문학
2013 .11
-
잉글랜드 혁명기 잉글랜드와 뉴잉글랜드 청교도의 교류
역사와 담론
2013 .04
-
Sangso : Written Petitions to the King - Function as a Silent Parliament?
Korea Journal
1987 .03
-
조선시대 왕의 이중적 재현 : 인조대를 중심으로
한국학연구
2012 .03
-
사무엘상 8장 11-17절의 ‘왕의 권리’ : 왕의 정당한 권리를 이야기하는 글
구약논단
2017 .12
-
셰익스피어의 두 번째 4부작과 영국에서의 법적 통치 전통
Shakespeare Review
2002 .06
-
Joseon Kings’ Personal Belief in Buddhism and its Political Significance
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2011 .03
-
<용비어천가>의 六祖 서술 양상 고찰
어문연구
2018 .01
-
新羅 哀莊王代의 政治變動과 金彦昇
한국고대사연구
2004 .06
-
조선시대 어제시의 창작 양상과 그 의미
장서각
2008 .06
-
고려 충혜왕의 행적과 정치적 입장
한국인물사연구
2010 .03
-
러시아 부르주아지와 1917년 러시아혁명
역사와경계
2005 .06
-
가네코 미스즈(金子みすず) 의 여성에 관한 인식과 그 의미 : 남녀의 묘사가 다름을 중심으로
일본연구
2012 .02
-
어찰의 정치학 : 정조와 심환지
역사비평
2009 .05
-
朝鮮初期 宗親職制의 정비와 운영
한국사연구
2010 .12
-
충선왕의 탄생과 결혼, 그리고 정치
한국인물사연구
2010 .09
-
18세기 조선 정치사상과 그 전후 맥락
역사학보
2012 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-014444967