지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Many scholars in modem Japan devoted themselves to an academic debate on the identity of a Japanese King, that is to a question of whether he is a Shogun or a Denno. Those intellectuals who participated eagerly in the debate were influenced by the rise of Neo-Confucianism in the seventeenth century. Proclaiming Neo-Confucianism as a national ideology and criticizing Japanese Buddhism which was being reshuffled at that time, they endeavored to unify Neo-Confucianism as a Chinese ideology and Shintoism as a traditional Japanese religion. While they discovered the significance of Shintoism and systemized it, they put an emphasis on the authenticity of Japanese purity.
However, with the rise and completion of BAKUHAN System, a lot of scholars came to suspect the authority of Shintoism or Jukashinto. Buddhist monks as well as traditional Confucianists and criticized Neo-Confucianism and Jukashinto. After being attacked from within and without, Jukashinto declined rapidly in the Genroku period, except for the Suikashinto affirmed by the disciples of Ansai. In this period, however, there was a major debate between Yusa Boksai and Muro Kyuzo as to whether a Neo-Confucianist could accept Japanese Shintoism.
Muro Kyuzo maintained that Neo-Confucianism was the only valuable philosophy and Japanese Shintoism was an old-fashioned culture. Considering the culture of the Genroku period a vulgar science, he entrusted the desirable academic discourse to Shogunate Power, He thought that the culture of Song and Ming dynasties of China was the ideal which his country had to imitate and realize. On the basis of Neo-Confucian philosophy, he insisted that Tokugawa Shogun is a Japanese King.
In contrast, Yusa Boksai reaffirmed the thought of his mentor, Ansai who emphasized Japanese Shintoism, With a belief in the genuineness and superiority of Denno, he doubted the policy of Shogunate Power. From the perspective of the universality of East Asia there was no difference between Chinese and Japanese culture. Yusa Boksai regarded his contemporary academic discourse to be one of the most prosperous sciences since the beginning of Japanese history, and sought a possibility of realizing the ideai of 'leo-Confucianism in terns of traditional Confucianism as well as of his contemporary intellectuals' discourse, On this belief, he also revealed a strong faith that traditional Shintoism and Denno would not be in conflict with Neo-Confucianism,
However, with the rise and completion of BAKUHAN System, a lot of scholars came to suspect the authority of Shintoism or Jukashinto. Buddhist monks as well as traditional Confucianists and criticized Neo-Confucianism and Jukashinto. After being attacked from within and without, Jukashinto declined rapidly in the Genroku period, except for the Suikashinto affirmed by the disciples of Ansai. In this period, however, there was a major debate between Yusa Boksai and Muro Kyuzo as to whether a Neo-Confucianist could accept Japanese Shintoism.
Muro Kyuzo maintained that Neo-Confucianism was the only valuable philosophy and Japanese Shintoism was an old-fashioned culture. Considering the culture of the Genroku period a vulgar science, he entrusted the desirable academic discourse to Shogunate Power, He thought that the culture of Song and Ming dynasties of China was the ideal which his country had to imitate and realize. On the basis of Neo-Confucian philosophy, he insisted that Tokugawa Shogun is a Japanese King.
In contrast, Yusa Boksai reaffirmed the thought of his mentor, Ansai who emphasized Japanese Shintoism, With a belief in the genuineness and superiority of Denno, he doubted the policy of Shogunate Power. From the perspective of the universality of East Asia there was no difference between Chinese and Japanese culture. Yusa Boksai regarded his contemporary academic discourse to be one of the most prosperous sciences since the beginning of Japanese history, and sought a possibility of realizing the ideai of 'leo-Confucianism in terns of traditional Confucianism as well as of his contemporary intellectuals' discourse, On this belief, he also revealed a strong faith that traditional Shintoism and Denno would not be in conflict with Neo-Confucianism,
목차
1. 머리말
2. 본론
3. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
中國 『明心寶鑑』의 受用과 傳播
동북아 문화연구
2003 .10
-
종교문화 교류유형으로 본 일본의 유교 수용과 습합 및 정착과정
일본근대학연구
2016 .01
-
Identity in the Balance : Japanese Neo-Nationalism
Global Asia
2010 .09
-
현대 부모 - 자녀관계와 조선시대 부모 - 자녀관계의 관계
아동학회지
1999 .06
-
The Advent of the Japanese Early Modern Age within East Asia – A Critique of Japanese Historical Studies
Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies
2007 .01
-
일본 주자학과 큐코사(吸江寺) ‒존왕론의 탄생과 굴절‒
일본근대학연구
2017 .01
-
The Revival of Confucianism in an Age of Globalization : Towards a Critical Confucianism
Journal of Multicultural Society : OMNES
2014 .07
-
다문화역량으로서의 성리학 사상, 성리학적 인간, 성리학 생활태도에 관한 연구
다문화콘텐츠연구
2019 .12
-
安珦의 性理學 傳播와 朝鮮性理學의 定向
퇴계학논총
2018 .01
-
A Study on the Korean Writing in Japanese - From an Educational Point of View of Japanese -
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2019 .07
-
모토오리 노리나가(本居宣長) ‘일본주의’ 탄생의 조건과 과정
아세아연구
2011 .06
-
유길준의 자연과 국가 : 주자학적 관점의 굴절
한국동양정치사상사연구
2018 .09
-
일본경영시스템에 대한 서구 문화주의 관점 연구
일본근대학연구
2016 .01
-
日本ㆍ韓国ㆍ台湾の高校生における日本文化の意識について : 受容と發信の視点から
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2005 .06
-
유가공부의 한 정곡인 격물치지에 대한 수양론적 시선
교육사상연구
2011 .01
-
동아시아 ‘근세’의 ‘유교적 근대’와 ‘병학적 근대’
퇴계학논총
2018 .01
-
Explaining the Dimensions of Neo-Regionalism in East Asia: A Japanese Perspective
세계지역연구논총
2009 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-014135424