메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한안면통증구강내과학회 Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain 대한구강내과학회지 제27권 제4호
발행연도
2002.12
수록면
401 - 413 (13page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Patients, referred to the Department of Oral Diagnosis & Oral Medicine. College of Dentistry. Yonsei University, for recurrent aphthous ulcer (RAU), were subjected to analysis and evaluation of the presence and the detection rate of H. pylori, obtained from ulcer lesion on buccal mucosa, f개m normal buccal mucosa, and from supragingival plaques, with the use of polymerase chain reaction(PCR), to assess the role of H. pylori as an oral reservoir as well as an etiologic factor for RAD. The results are summarized as follows.
I. In a sample of the RAU group (RAU patients), 32.6% was H. pylori positive, of which ulcer lesion on buccal mucosa and plaques showed 35.0% and 30.0% of positivity respectively. In a sample of the history group (patients with history of RAU), 15.0% proved positive of H. pylori, in which buccal mucosa and plaques indicated 5,0% and 25.0% respectively. Finally, in a sample of the control group, only 7.5% tested positive for H. pylori, in which buccal mucosa and plaque were positively identified with 10,0% and 5.0% respectively.
2. The RAU group and the control group showed statistically significant difference (p<0.01), whereas no difference was
found between the RAU and the history group, or between the history and the control group,
3. Significant difference (P<0.05) was found when the buccal mucosa of the RAU group and that of the history group were compared. However, there was no evidence of significant difference between the RAU group and the control group, or between the history and the control group.
4, Significant difference (P<0.05) was also shown between plaques of the RAU group and those of the control group, when there was no difference between the RAU and the history group, or between the history and the control group,
Based on the data stated above, this investigation supports the hypothesis that H. pylori can be considered as a possible etiological factor for RAU, and that plaques play a role as an oral reservoir of H pylori. However, need for more profound and comprehensive study (such as immunology, microbiology, molecular cell biology, etc,) can be required, using more subjects, Additionally, the investigation of the relationship between the RAU and the gastric ulcer, of which H. pylori is the cause, is considered to be of value.

목차

1. 서론

2. 연구대상 및 방법

3. 연구결과

4. 총괄 및 고찰

5. 결론

참고문헌

ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-515-013693271