지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국현대소설학회 현대소설연구 현대소설연구 제97호
- 발행연도
- 2025.3
- 수록면
- 99 - 133 (35page)
- DOI
- 10.20483/JKFR.2025.03.97.99
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper examines the literary trajectory of Kim Mun-jip, a controversial figure in Korean literary criticism during the mid-to-late 1930s. Despite his active engagement in the field, Kim became a problematic figure due to his pro-Japanese stance and eccentric behavior. His literary development can be divided into three phases: (1) experimental modernist fiction, (2) criticism centered on the question of literary language, and (3) engagement with the discourse on Naeseon Ilche (Japan-Korea Unity, 内鮮一体).
Kim’s early literary endeavors were shaped by Japanese modernism, particularly the Shinkankakuha(新感覚派). His early work, the novel written in Japanese Rimoshi(理毛師), set in a futuristic Tokyo, reflected a dual consciousness toward modernity through the figure of the 'modern girl,' observed from a marginalized perspective. Subsequently, he sought to establish a unique literary identity by exploring the regionality of a declining Korea but failed to gain literary recognition.
After returning to Korea in 1935, he turned to literary criticism, advocating the notion that “literature is the art of language.” He argued that Korean literature suffered from a lack of tradition and artistic quality. Although his critiques often lacked logical coherence, they ignited debates on the essence of literature, particularly in a critical landscape searching for new directions after the decline of proletarian literature. He notably praised Kim Yu-jeong’s literary language and called for a renewal of Korean literature. However, his limited understanding of Korean literary traditions and linguistic biases hindered his critical depth.
Following the outbreak of the Second Sino-Japanese War, Kim aligned himself with the colonial policy of Naeseon Ilche, envisioning complete equality and indistinguishability between Koreans and Japanese. He argued that the beauty and uniqueness of Korean-language literature could enrich Japanese culture. Furthermore, he sought to reconcile his identity as an artist wandering between Japan and Korea through the aesthetic framework of Naeseon Ilche, but ultimately faced downfall amid criticism from Korean writers and his own self-destructive actions.
Kim Mun-jip’s literary trajectory provides a valuable case for reconsidering the significance of modernism and aestheticism in the non-Western East Asian context. It also sheds light on the diverse spectrum of discourses and practices surrounding Naeseon Ilche in colonial Korea.
Kim’s early literary endeavors were shaped by Japanese modernism, particularly the Shinkankakuha(新感覚派). His early work, the novel written in Japanese Rimoshi(理毛師), set in a futuristic Tokyo, reflected a dual consciousness toward modernity through the figure of the 'modern girl,' observed from a marginalized perspective. Subsequently, he sought to establish a unique literary identity by exploring the regionality of a declining Korea but failed to gain literary recognition.
After returning to Korea in 1935, he turned to literary criticism, advocating the notion that “literature is the art of language.” He argued that Korean literature suffered from a lack of tradition and artistic quality. Although his critiques often lacked logical coherence, they ignited debates on the essence of literature, particularly in a critical landscape searching for new directions after the decline of proletarian literature. He notably praised Kim Yu-jeong’s literary language and called for a renewal of Korean literature. However, his limited understanding of Korean literary traditions and linguistic biases hindered his critical depth.
Following the outbreak of the Second Sino-Japanese War, Kim aligned himself with the colonial policy of Naeseon Ilche, envisioning complete equality and indistinguishability between Koreans and Japanese. He argued that the beauty and uniqueness of Korean-language literature could enrich Japanese culture. Furthermore, he sought to reconcile his identity as an artist wandering between Japan and Korea through the aesthetic framework of Naeseon Ilche, but ultimately faced downfall amid criticism from Korean writers and his own self-destructive actions.
Kim Mun-jip’s literary trajectory provides a valuable case for reconsidering the significance of modernism and aestheticism in the non-Western East Asian context. It also sheds light on the diverse spectrum of discourses and practices surrounding Naeseon Ilche in colonial Korea.
#Kim, Mun-jip
#Literature Written in Korean
#김문집
#Modernism
#조선어 문학
#Novel written in Japanese
#모더니즘
#일본어 소설
#Aestheticism
#예술 지상주의
#Colonial Korean Literary Criticism
#조선문학 비평
#Colonial Korean Language Education
#조선어 교육
#문학 번역
#Literary Translation
#내선일체
#대일 협력
#Naeseon Ilche(Japan-Korea unity, 内鮮一体)
#Kim, Mun-jip
#Literature Written in Korean
#Pro-Japanese collaboration
#Modernism
#Novel written in Japanese
#Aestheticism
#Colonial Korean Literary Criticism
#Colonial Korean Language Education
#Literary Translation
#Naeseon Ilche(Japan-Korea unity, 内鮮一体)
#Pro-Japanese collaboration
목차
요약
요약
1. 들어가며
1. 들어가며
2. ｢이모사(理毛師)｣의 모더니즘 실험
2. ｢이모사(理毛師)｣의 모더니즘 실험
3. 언어의 조선 혹은 문학어라는 출사표
3. 언어의 조선 혹은 문학어라는 출사표
4. 내선일체하 조선어 문학의 운명
5. 나가며
4. 내선일체하 조선어 문학의 운명
참고문헌
Abstract
5. 나가며
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
다음 책도 문학이기를
번역하다
2022 .03
-
문학의 밤 외 1편
시조시학
2022 .12
-
[문학] 문학이 해야 할 일
창비어린이
2015 .06
-
문학의 일, 문학은 일
자음과모음
2020 .03
-
지나치게 문학적인
번역하다
2022 .04
-
밤, 항구 그리고 울음 - 박현덕, 『밤 군산항』(문학들, 2020)
시조시학
2020 .06
-
다시, 문학지
자음과모음
2019 .03
-
식민지 조선의 세계문학 : 한국근대문학의 초극을 위하여
한국문학과 예술
2015 .03
-
소설 쓰기와 비평 행위의 함수 관계-김문집의 경우-
인문과학연구
2018 .01
-
문학치료의 문학교육적 적용에 관한 고찰 - 교양문학수업의 치유적 가능성을 중심으로 -
문학교육학
2020 .01
-
문학을 통한 ‘나’라는 문학의 발견과 미적 실현 - 자기서사를 축으로 한 문학의 탐구와 교육 -
문학교육학
2024 .09
-
한국전쟁기 남북한 문학담론 기원 연구
비평문학
2019 .09
-
60년대 세계문학론의 코드화 과정 : 60년대 후반 비평을 중심으로
우리문학연구
2016 .01
-
김현 비평 연구 : 문학의 자율성 테제를 중심으로
어문논총
2015 .12
-
문학연구의 우울
현대문학의 연구
2015 .10
-
비극적으로 아름다워야 한다는 조건 - 1990년대 여성문학의 제도 문학 편입 맥락과 그 과정
현대소설연구
2021 .09
-
중국에서의 한국 현대문학 연구 현황 분석 및 향후 방향 설정
문학교육학
2018 .01
-
한국전쟁이후 문예지(종합지)의 외국문학 수용과 이해
국학연구론총
2021 .01
-
일제 강점기 중국에서 번역된 조선 문학 : 중화적 세계문학 개념과 조선 문학의 위치
비평문학
2017 .06
-
미래 사회의 글쓰기와 문학, 혹은 문학교육
국제언어문학
2018 .12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092474273