메뉴 건너뛰기
내서재 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

Impact of macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) on accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy of solid lesions
추천
검색

Impact of macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) on accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy of solid lesions

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Hussein Okasha (Department of Internal Medicine, KasrAlAiny School of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt) Ahmed Ebrahim (Department of Internal Medicine, KasrAlAiny School of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt) Ihab Samih (Department of Internal Medicine, KasrAlAiny School of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt)
저널정보
소화기인터벤션의학회 International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention Vol.13 No.3 KCI등재
발행연도
2024.7
수록면
98 - 104 (7page)
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18528/ijgii240026

이용수

표지
Impact of macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) on accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy of solid lesions
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) tissue acquisition requires rapid on-site evaluation to improve diagnostic yield with less needle passes; however, this is not readily available in all centers, also it increases the duration and the cost of the procedure. Macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) is the direct assessment of the tissue sample provided by EUS-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) macroscopically, to detect whether it is sufficient or not. Aim of this study was to define the role of MOSE in judging the adequacy of the tissue core specimens and to evaluate its diagnostic yield and accuracy. Methods: This prospective study was conducted at our institution with 215 participants of both genders presenting for evaluation of solid or mixed solid and cystic lesions by MOSE technique by EUS-fine needle aspiration (FNA) or FNB. Results: In obtaining conclusive sample MOSE score 1 sensitivity was 68.2%, specificity was 75%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 99.3, negative predictive value (NPV) was 4.3 and overall accuracy was 68.4, in MOSE score 2 sensitivity was 88%, specificity was 75%, PPV was 99.5, NPV was 10 and overall accuracy was 87, in MOSE 2 (FNB) sensitivity was 92%, Specificity was 67%, PPV was 99.4, NPV was 12, 5 and overall accuracy was 92. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with conclusive and inconclusive cytopathological results regarding size of the needle, number of needle passes, type of the needle and the specimen acquisition method. Conclusion: Using MOSE for assessment of adequacy of the sample obtained by EUS-FNB showed higher diagnostic yield compared to conventional method using different needle sizes.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

댓글(0)

0

첫번째 댓글을 남겨주세요.