메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박혜영 (인하대학교)
저널정보
한국영미문학페미니즘학회 영미문학페미니즘 영미문학페미니즘 제32권 제2호
발행연도
2024.9
수록면
57 - 85 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Concerns about rapid population growth threatening the Earth’s ecosystem have been intermittently raised since Thomas Malthus first proposed the need for population control in his An Essay on the Principle of Population. The rise of neo-Malthusianism, which advocates for fertility regulation to manage population growth, has brought to light various technological birth control methods. This approach, gaining traction among ecologists and post-feminists, addresses climate change but faces critiques for focusing on population size rather than on increased greenhouse gas emissions linked to excessive consumption associated with ‘the imperial mode of living’ in the affluent Global North. Moreover, the discourse on population control is deeply interwined with the restriction of women’s rights, racially discriminatory practices and even coercive measures. This paper explores how technological population control has shifted women’s reproduction from ‘birthing’ to ‘making’. Technological interventions not only control population size but, as seen in Huxley’s Brave New World, also engineer its quality. These methods risk reinforcing gender, class, racial, and eugenic biases as well. Haraway’s proposal of “making kin, not babies” suggests that technology could aid both in population reduction and in the preservation of endangered species through kinnovation. Nonetheless, this paper argues that both Huxley’s and Haraway’s technocentric approaches to population control have significant limitations and calls for a more equitable ecological transition.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0