지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第169輯
- 발행연도
- 2024.12
- 수록면
- 251 - 292 (42page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2024.12.169.251
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper examines the territorial expansion of the Zhu Yuanzhang regime from the 1360s to the early 1380s, analyzing how the concept of “China” that Zhu Yuanzhang asserted adapted according to the regions under his control. While previous studies have largely concluded that Zhu Yuanzhang distinguished sharply between China and foreign countries, advocating for peaceful diplomacy, this study reveals that the Zhu Yuanzhang regime engaged in repeated warfare, continually expanding the boundaries of what was considered “China.”
When Zhu Yuanzhang initially rose to power in Jiangnan, he refrained from openly declaring an ambition to conquer the entire world. Instead, he frequently sought alliances with neighboring rivals, reserving declarations of conquest until the brink of war. On the eve of his ascension to the throne, he promoted the slogan “Drive out the Barbarians and restore China,” yet he left the exact boundaries of “China” undefined. His primary military targets were the territories of the former Song and Jin dynasties, which had preceded the Mongol Empire. However, his campaigns extended beyond these regions. Amidst the turmoil within the China, he annexed parts of Sichuan, later justifying his actions by claiming this was “originally” Chinese land. Similarly, he sought to claim Shanxi and Shaanxi, regions previously held by the Tangut and Uyghur and later designated by the Mongol Empire as part of “China.” In his assaults on Guangdong and Guangxi—regions with long-standing autonomy for foreign ethnic groups—he emphasized their historic ties to past Chinese dynasties. He also extended his reach to Yunnan, a province that had never been part of the Chinese dynasties in history, asserting that it, too, belonged to China.
Zhu Yuanzhang’s envisioned boundaries of China were fluid and adaptable. The concept of “China” itself was ambiguous, especially given the vast territorial expansion under the Mongol Empire. As the Mongols receded, Zhu Yuanzhang directed his efforts toward defining his own version of China. This vision was elastic; ample historical precedent could justify labeling almost any region as “China.” Whether a region was considered part of China or not depended on how it was constructed and what his immediate objectives required.
When Zhu Yuanzhang initially rose to power in Jiangnan, he refrained from openly declaring an ambition to conquer the entire world. Instead, he frequently sought alliances with neighboring rivals, reserving declarations of conquest until the brink of war. On the eve of his ascension to the throne, he promoted the slogan “Drive out the Barbarians and restore China,” yet he left the exact boundaries of “China” undefined. His primary military targets were the territories of the former Song and Jin dynasties, which had preceded the Mongol Empire. However, his campaigns extended beyond these regions. Amidst the turmoil within the China, he annexed parts of Sichuan, later justifying his actions by claiming this was “originally” Chinese land. Similarly, he sought to claim Shanxi and Shaanxi, regions previously held by the Tangut and Uyghur and later designated by the Mongol Empire as part of “China.” In his assaults on Guangdong and Guangxi—regions with long-standing autonomy for foreign ethnic groups—he emphasized their historic ties to past Chinese dynasties. He also extended his reach to Yunnan, a province that had never been part of the Chinese dynasties in history, asserting that it, too, belonged to China.
Zhu Yuanzhang’s envisioned boundaries of China were fluid and adaptable. The concept of “China” itself was ambiguous, especially given the vast territorial expansion under the Mongol Empire. As the Mongols receded, Zhu Yuanzhang directed his efforts toward defining his own version of China. This vision was elastic; ample historical precedent could justify labeling almost any region as “China.” Whether a region was considered part of China or not depended on how it was constructed and what his immediate objectives required.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 소재
Ⅱ. 명 초 ‘중국’의 신축적 범주
Ⅲ. 주원장 군대의 진군과 확장되는 ‘중국’
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
공민왕은 주원장을 믿을 수 있었을까 - 신흥 명을 바라보는 고려의 불안 -
한국사연구
2025 .03
-
『朝鮮義勇隊通訊』의 旣影印刊物에 누락되었던 號·期·面들
한국독립운동사연구
2021 .11
-
China’s National Identity from Historical Perspectives: The Return of the Chinese Empire
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2022 .06
-
중국의 해양영토인식과 국정 역사교과서의 서술 변화
사림
2019 .01
-
현대중국의 영토인식과 역사교육 ― 현행 중국 중학교 역사교과서의 지도를 중심으로 ―
사림
2015 .01
-
중국 근대 역사학에서 國家 개념의 재구성
역사와 담론
2019 .01
-
중국 시진핑 정권의 권력구조와 종교정책에 관한 연구
신학과 목회
2019 .05
-
중국의 역사강역 담론과 제국 전통
역사문화연구
2017 .01
-
‘10년이나’ 또는 ‘10년밖에’ -1950년대 中國科學社의 존속과 폐지-
중국근현대사연구
2024 .06
-
한중인문학 30년 회고와 전망
한중인문학연구
2021 .01
-
우크라이나 전쟁과 중국의 입장에 관한 연구
민족연구
2022 .09
-
미중 패권 갈등이 한반도 평화에 미치는 영향
신학과 목회
2020 .11
-
시진핑 시대 중국의 세계 담론과 중국서사의 동향
중국지식네트워크
2020 .01
-
수교 이후 한중관계의 평가와 신형관계(新型關係)를 위한 정책제언
아시아문화연구
2020 .08
-
해방 전후 정인보의 교유 관계
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2023 .03
-
2030 세대의 중국 인식에 관한 일고 - 중국문화 수업 사례를 중심으로
중국어문학논집
2021 .10
-
중국의 제해권 확충 노력 : 조어도 분쟁을 중심으로
영토해양연구
2015 .06
-
The Continuity and Change of North Korea’s China Policy under Kim Jong-un
중국지식네트워크
2022 .11
-
조선시대 朱子 崇慕熱과 그 이미지의 시각화 양상
대동문화연구
2016 .01
-
미국의 중국학 연구동향과 함의 — 저널 ‘모던 차이나(Modern China)’ 분석을 중심으로 —
사림
2018 .01
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092138389