지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第169輯
- 발행연도
- 2024.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 44 (44page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2024.12.169.001
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The punishment of forced migration was originally intended for expulsion or isolation. However, by the late Warring States period, the Qin Dynasty adapted the existing punishment of forced migration into the system of “Qianxing” (遷刑) to stabilize newly acquired territories. Consequently, Qianxing under the Qin transformed into a tool for ensuring the stability of new lands through forced relocation. This trend continued into the early Han Dynasty. The application of Qianxing to various crimes, the selection and arrangement of exile destinations, and the management of convicts upon arrival in exile demonstrate that Qianxing was operated to stabilize new territories during the Qin and Han periods.
Firstly, Qianxing under the Qin was primarily applied to a wide range of everyday crimes committed by the populace, as well as misconduct and illegal profit-seeking activities by officials. Through this, the Qin was able to achieve the stable relocation of a sufficient number of minor offenders to exile destinations.
Secondly, the Qin utilized diverse occupied territories, including Ba-shu (巴蜀), as new places of exile. This diversification of exile locations reflects the Qin Empire’s need to artificially adjust the population due to territorial expansion. Additionally, the method of assigning exile locations in the Qin and Han demonstrates the purpose of Qianxing. The Han Dynasty, when assigning exiles, placed them in regions similar to their original residences, suggesting that the primary focus of Qianxing was not merely expulsion or punishment but rather the stable guidance and settlement of convicts in exile.
Thirdly, various mechanisms were devised to facilitate the settlement of convicts in exile. Not only the convicts but also their families were relocated, and they were granted fields and residences to encourage stable settlement. These individuals were not allowed to leave the exile regions or belong to any other area outside the exile locations.
The reason for such persistent monitoring and the creation of various stabilization measures for the convicts was that, in the short term, forced population migration was the only way to stabilize and develop new territories. In the context of an as-yet-unstable unified empire, convicts represented important resources within each exile location.
Firstly, Qianxing under the Qin was primarily applied to a wide range of everyday crimes committed by the populace, as well as misconduct and illegal profit-seeking activities by officials. Through this, the Qin was able to achieve the stable relocation of a sufficient number of minor offenders to exile destinations.
Secondly, the Qin utilized diverse occupied territories, including Ba-shu (巴蜀), as new places of exile. This diversification of exile locations reflects the Qin Empire’s need to artificially adjust the population due to territorial expansion. Additionally, the method of assigning exile locations in the Qin and Han demonstrates the purpose of Qianxing. The Han Dynasty, when assigning exiles, placed them in regions similar to their original residences, suggesting that the primary focus of Qianxing was not merely expulsion or punishment but rather the stable guidance and settlement of convicts in exile.
Thirdly, various mechanisms were devised to facilitate the settlement of convicts in exile. Not only the convicts but also their families were relocated, and they were granted fields and residences to encourage stable settlement. These individuals were not allowed to leave the exile regions or belong to any other area outside the exile locations.
The reason for such persistent monitoring and the creation of various stabilization measures for the convicts was that, in the short term, forced population migration was the only way to stabilize and develop new territories. In the context of an as-yet-unstable unified empire, convicts represented important resources within each exile location.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 하나의 형벌, 두 가지 목적
Ⅲ. 유배지[遷所]의 배정에 보이는 遷刑의 목적
Ⅳ. 受刑者의 정착을 위한 장치들
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
淸代 旗人의 추방형 면제 특권과 그 변천 - 범죄유형에 따른 추방형 면제와 집행의 竝存 -
동양사학연구
2021 .03
-
17세기 소설의 사랑과 운명 - ‘적강 모티프’ 활용의 맥락
고소설연구
2016 .01
-
적강형(謫降型) <두껍전>의 새 이본, 전남대 도서관 소장 <둑겁전> 연구
온지논총
2023 .01
-
“그 땅에서 쫓겨난 자(נׅכְּאוּ מׅן־הׇאׇדֶאׇרֶץ)” 대한 사회학적 분석 - 욥기 30:1~8을 중심으로 -
구약논단
2021 .12
-
淸代 流配犯의 實相과 地方의 管理策 -四川省 巴縣의 사례를 중심으로-
중국사연구
2021 .10
-
유배(流配)의 정치학 시론: 법규와 사례에 대한 검토
담론201
2020 .01
-
청초 동북지역의 유배 지식인 - 함가(函可)와 시 창작을 중심으로
중국문화연구
2020 .02
-
‘前’의 이동 의미 소실에 관한 고찰
중국어문논총
2016 .08
-
후산(后山) 정윤영(鄭胤永)의 시 세계 일고
온지논총
2020 .01
-
조선시대 유배제도 연구의 성과와 과제
도서문화
2021 .12
-
喀斯特地区城市化进程中的人口流动特征与影响因素研究——以中国贵阳市为例
중국학
2023 .06
-
김려(金?)의 유배 문인 형상화 고찰
국문학연구
2021 .11
-
胡宏의 性論 再論
孔子學
2018 .01
-
基於文學治療的視角看錢謙益的《後秋興》
중국어문학논집
2020 .08
-
고려 태조대 유배형의 시원과 실상
대구사학
2023 .05
-
유배일기에 기록된 가족 사별(死別)과 유배객의 심적 상태 - <적소일기>와 <신도일록>을 중심으로
韓國古典硏究
2021 .11
-
세네카 위로 편지에 나타난 철학상담적 함의: ‘헬비아에게 보내는 위로’를 중심으로
철학∙사상∙문화
2024 .01
-
中國陰陽五行法律思想源流
중국사연구
2016 .01
-
고려 시기의 해도 유배 －징벌을 통한 자발적 복종의 구조화 측면에서－
한국사학보
2022 .11
-
중국 미학 범주인 ‘흥(興)’의 두 함의
인문과 예술
2020 .01
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092133875