메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
강수진 (대구대학교) 우정민 (대구대학교)
저널정보
한국간호교육학회 한국간호교육학회지 한국간호교육학회지 제30권 제4호
발행연도
2024.11
수록면
330 - 346 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: This study aimed to provide a descriptive review of health literacy competency questionnaires and to identify their attributes for developing a health literacy competency measurement tool to be used by Korean health professionals. Methods: A literature review was conducted through a search in international and Korean databases (PubMed, CINAHL, RISS, and KISS) for articles published between 2010 and 2024. A total of 2,200 articles were explored, out of which 6 studies met the inclusion criteria. Results: In Canada, an initial set of health literacy competency questionnaires was developed; subsequently, two questionnaires were developed in China and Brazil. Another study was translated using the initial Canadian study questionnaires, and two studies were modified. All six studies meeting the inclusion criteria employed a Delphi process involving 20~41 expert panels. Among the six studies, only one reported the psychometric properties of the questionnaires used. The reviewed questionnaires comprised knowledge, attitude, skills, and practice domains based on Bloom’s taxonomy. Knowledge and skills were commonly included factors in the questionnaires. Conclusion: There were 17 knowledge, 10 attitude, 13 skills, and 13 practice attributes for each area of the reviewed questionnaires. “Easy-to-read materials,” “plain language,” and “teach-back” were identified as appropriate attributes for measuring health literacy competencies. Among the questionnaires, there were many items and many overlapping items between the domains. Further studies are required to refine their essential attributes and to verify the instruments’ psychometric properties in order to increase their feasibility.

목차

서론
연구 방법
연구 결과
논의
결론 및 제언
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-091190198