지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제55호
- 발행연도
- 2024.10
- 수록면
- 7 - 26 (20page)
- DOI
- 10.28977/jbtr.2024.10.55.7
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study examines the translation issues surrounding Zephaniah 3:8, a verse that has been the topic of long-standing debate among scholars. The verse is challenging to a complexity of elements and ambiguity of context. It begins with the command, “Therefore wait for me,” but it is unclear who both the second-person plural ‘you’ and the third-person plural ‘them’ refers to in the phrase “pour out my wrath upon them.” If the distinction between the subjects of the command to ‘wait’ (directed at the second-person plural) and the objects of ‘God’s wrath’ (third-person plural) is not clearly understood, it can lead to confusion in interpretation. For example, without clear differentiation, it becomes ambiguous whether the nations are being summoned for judgment or as instruments of judgment. Additionally, the interpretation of the term ‘lĕ‘ad (לעד)’ varies, with possibilities including ‘forever’, ‘prey’, or ‘witness’. These differences in translation and interpretation are crucial for understanding the overall theological message of Zephaniah, thereby making making an accurate translation of this verse essential for clearly conveying the themes of judgment and restoration.
This study argues that the command in Zephaniah 3:8 to “wait for me” reflects a positive anticipation, identifying the subjects as the humble and poor people mentioned in Zephaniah 2:3 and 3:12. These individuals are to wait until God rises as a witness. Interpreting ‘lĕ‘ad (לעד)’ as ‘witness’ or ‘testimony’ takes into account the educational function of the judgment on the nations toward Jerusalem, emphasizing God’s justice and reinforcing the message of judgment and repentance. The study also identifies the subjects of ‘God’s wrath and anger’ as the corrupt Jerusalem, its leaders, and the nations. In this context, Zephaniah 3:8 serves as a pivotal turning point in the book.
The verse emphasizes the judgmental aspect of the Day of the Lord while also offering hope and salvation to those who wait for that day. Therefore, this study proposes that Zephaniah 3:8 provides hope to those who humbly wait for God while warning Jerusalem’s corrupt leaders and the nations of impending judgment. Within the broader context of Zephaniah, this verse plays a key role in linking the dual themes of judgment and restoration centered on the Day of the Lord.
In conclusion, the study suggests that the translation of Zephaniah 3:8 should reflect these dual themes of judgment and restoration, demonstrating that a correct understanding of this verse is vital for grasping the overall message of the book of Zephaniah.
This study argues that the command in Zephaniah 3:8 to “wait for me” reflects a positive anticipation, identifying the subjects as the humble and poor people mentioned in Zephaniah 2:3 and 3:12. These individuals are to wait until God rises as a witness. Interpreting ‘lĕ‘ad (לעד)’ as ‘witness’ or ‘testimony’ takes into account the educational function of the judgment on the nations toward Jerusalem, emphasizing God’s justice and reinforcing the message of judgment and repentance. The study also identifies the subjects of ‘God’s wrath and anger’ as the corrupt Jerusalem, its leaders, and the nations. In this context, Zephaniah 3:8 serves as a pivotal turning point in the book.
The verse emphasizes the judgmental aspect of the Day of the Lord while also offering hope and salvation to those who wait for that day. Therefore, this study proposes that Zephaniah 3:8 provides hope to those who humbly wait for God while warning Jerusalem’s corrupt leaders and the nations of impending judgment. Within the broader context of Zephaniah, this verse plays a key role in linking the dual themes of judgment and restoration centered on the Day of the Lord.
In conclusion, the study suggests that the translation of Zephaniah 3:8 should reflect these dual themes of judgment and restoration, demonstrating that a correct understanding of this verse is vital for grasping the overall message of the book of Zephaniah.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 본문
3. 나가는 말
참고문헌(References)
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
12예언서 내 스바냐의 정경적 위치와 그 함의
성경원문연구
2022 .10
-
스바냐와 요시야 개혁 - 요시야 개혁에 대한 예언적 관점 -
성경원문연구
2021 .10
-
예루살렘의 지도층을 향한 스바냐의 예언
선교와 신학
2016 .06
-
The Poor (עָנִי) and the Remnant (שְׁאֵרִית): A Canonical Consideration of the Theology of the Poor in Amos and Zephaniah
Canon&Culture
2022 .10
-
나훔서, 하박국서, 스바냐서의 메시지의 연관성 : 하박국의 불평과 야웨의 답변을 중심으로
구약논단
2024 .09
-
생태 위기 시대에 성서 읽기 -스바냐의 야웨의 날을 중심으로-
구약논단
2022 .09
-
헤겔의 현존재의 판단론 비판
동서철학연구
2018 .01
-
12 소예언서의 이방 민족들 : 이방나라들에 대한 심판의 말을 중심으로 본 12 소예언서의 구성에 관한 연구
구약논단
2019 .03
-
선지서의 “여호와의 날” 개념으로 본 ACTS 신학공관운동의 타당성과 제언
ACTS 신학저널
2021 .01
-
미가서의 문학적 통일성: 시온을 향한 심판과 소망의 이중주
구약논단
2025 .03
-
맹자 윤리학에 기초한 도덕 판단 모델 연구
윤리연구
2020 .01
-
The Exodus Theme in the Bowl Judgments in Revelation 16: A Study of Patterns in Old Testament Usages in Revelation
ACTS 신학저널
2022 .10
-
애가의 문학적 및 종교사상사적 기능: 탄식에서 희망으로의 전환
구약논단
2021 .12
-
시편 109편 6-19절은 시인의 기도인가? 원수들의 저주인가?
구약논단
2018 .09
-
아모스, 언약에 의한 심판과 회복 —아모스 2:6-15을 중심으로
ACTS 신학저널
2015 .01
-
汉语谦词的语义分析及其文化理据 — 以“家” “舍”两类谦词为例
중국문화연구
2022 .08
-
에스겔서의 3단계 구조에서 고이의 기능
구약논단
2020 .09
-
칸트의 무한판단론 고찰
동서철학연구
2019 .01
-
일곱 인과 하나님의 심판
신약연구
2022 .06
-
신명기 역사에 나타난 ‘하나님의 사람’ 구절 연구 : 왕상 12:33~13:34
신학과 목회
2018 .11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-091063187