지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study examines how the Qin state, from the Warring States period through its unification, addressed the labor demands necessary for national administration by mobilizing specific categories of manpower in particular ways. The Qin established and utilized laborer-servants (Tu-li) of subordinate status, thereby forcibly securing control over manpower. The fact that the titles of each laborer-servant (Lichenqie, Chengdan-chong, Guixin-baican, Sikou, Hou) are derived from specific types of labor suggests that each tu-li status was established to meet the labor demands of specific tasks. The phenomenon of criminals being reorganized into specific statuses and assigned to specific labor duties first appeared during the Warring States period.
With the emergence of territorial states, the types of labor required also increased. However, since the state-controlled manpower resources were limited, it was not possible to allocate manpower equally across all tasks. Therefore, it was necessary to “select and concentrate” on labor tasks where manpower would be intensively deployed according to state needs. By synthesizing the Account Book of Laborers (Zuotubu) from the Liye Qinjian and the Qin Code, which record the labor assignments of laborer-servants, it is evident that the Qin state concentrated laborer-servants and overseers on the following tasks: ① state farm cultivation, ② state-run handicraft industries, ③ assistance to government officials, ④ construction and maintenance, and ⑤ material transportation.
Although the primary manpower resource of the Qin was laborer-servants, the Qin state also mobilized common people (Qianshou). These commoners were the main taxpayers and the foundation of the Qin’s imperial rule, and thus could not be equated with the laborer-servants. Furthermore, even among the laborer-servants, different treatments were applied according to the severity of their crimes. For these two reasons, the Qin state prioritized manpower allocation based on status. The general principle was that laborer-servants were utilized for almost all tasks before commoners, and among the laborer-servants, Chengdan-chong and Guixin-baican were employed without restriction for more arduous labor compared to Lichenqie. This principle was faithfully reflected in actual labor assignments.
With the emergence of territorial states, the types of labor required also increased. However, since the state-controlled manpower resources were limited, it was not possible to allocate manpower equally across all tasks. Therefore, it was necessary to “select and concentrate” on labor tasks where manpower would be intensively deployed according to state needs. By synthesizing the Account Book of Laborers (Zuotubu) from the Liye Qinjian and the Qin Code, which record the labor assignments of laborer-servants, it is evident that the Qin state concentrated laborer-servants and overseers on the following tasks: ① state farm cultivation, ② state-run handicraft industries, ③ assistance to government officials, ④ construction and maintenance, and ⑤ material transportation.
Although the primary manpower resource of the Qin was laborer-servants, the Qin state also mobilized common people (Qianshou). These commoners were the main taxpayers and the foundation of the Qin’s imperial rule, and thus could not be equated with the laborer-servants. Furthermore, even among the laborer-servants, different treatments were applied according to the severity of their crimes. For these two reasons, the Qin state prioritized manpower allocation based on status. The general principle was that laborer-servants were utilized for almost all tasks before commoners, and among the laborer-servants, Chengdan-chong and Guixin-baican were employed without restriction for more arduous labor compared to Lichenqie. This principle was faithfully reflected in actual labor assignments.
목차
머리말
Ⅰ. 身分의 탄생 - 인력 자원 창출의 수단
Ⅱ. 秦이 설정한 주요 노동 항목
Ⅲ. 효율적 使役을 위한 원칙과 실제
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
秦의 ‘新地’ 인식과 점령지 지배
중국고중세사연구
2017 .11
-
秦代 縣廷의 재정운용과 회계처리 : 里耶秦簡을 중심으로
중국고중세사연구
2017 .08
-
(書評) 『里耶秦簡牘校釋』(第2卷): 秦代 지방 통치의 일단
동아문화
2019 .12
-
『嶽麓秦簡』을 통하여 본 秦·漢初의 婚姻·奴婢·妻
역사와 담론
2019 .07
-
秦漢券書簡所反映的“名計”制度
동서인문
2021 .08
-
里耶秦簡을 통해 본 秦代 縣廷의租稅징수
동양사학연구
2017 .09
-
秦漢시대 馬政과 그 전개
동양사학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2019 .04
-
秦漢時期 ‘里’ · ‘單’과 ‘宗人’ －嶽麓秦簡 ‘識劫𡟰案’으로부터－
동서인문
2021 .12
-
秦 · 漢 시기 國有 人力 유지의 재정적 부담과 그 영향 - 도예 노동과 고용 노동의 비용 지출을 중심으로 -
중국고중세사연구
2020 .05
-
<<嶽麓書院藏秦簡>> (肆ㆍ伍) 秦令의 編制 원칙
중국사연구
2020 .01
-
2013年秦漢魏晉簡牘研究概述
목간과문자
2015 .12
-
秦諸夏考
동서인문
2021 .04
-
?代徒刑的常規與特例
중국사연구
2020 .01
-
개념 형성 과정과 그 맥락 요인 고찰-<서유견문>과 <신소설>의 노동자 지칭어를 중심으로-
한말연구
2018 .01
-
노동문학을 넘어 일상적 노동의 회복으로
한국문학논총
2019 .01
-
선진(先秦)시기 중국어 수량(數量)구조 연구
중국문화연구
2021 .02
-
秦 簡牘에 보이는 ‘執法’의 새로운 해석: 秦郡에 대한 평가를 겸하여
동아문화
2024 .06
-
岳麓秦简中对、请、奏文书与秦始皇的阅读速度 - 一兼论秦代办公照明问题 -
동서인문
2022 .12
-
孔子形象与≪吕氏春秋≫经典的形成 －兼论孔子与秦国的文化关系－
중국어문학
2016 .12
-
표지로서의 虛辭 : 秦漢시기 법률 속 ‘及’의 어법적 기능
중국고중세사연구
2018 .05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0