메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Kim Jihoon (Division of Cardiology, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.) Chang Sung-A (Division of Cardiology, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.) Park Seung Woo (Division of Cardiology, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.)
저널정보
대한의학회 Journal of Korean Medical Science Journal of Korean Medical Science Vol.39 No.2
발행연도
2024.1
수록면
1 - 11 (11page)
DOI
10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e18

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: Recently, a ring-type cuffless blood pressure (BP) measuring device has been developed. This study was a prospective, single arm, first-in-human pivotal trial to evaluate accuracy of BP measurement by the new device. Methods: The ring-type smart wearable monitoring device measures photoplethysmography signals from the proximal phalanx and transmits the data wirelessly to a connected smartphone. For the BP comparison, a cuff was worn on the arm to check the reference BP by auscultatory method, while the test device was worn on the finger of the opposite arm to measure BP simultaneously. Measurements were repeated for up to three sets each on the left and right arms. The primary outcome measure was mean difference and standard deviation of BP differences between the test device and the reference readings. Results: We obtained 526 sets of systolic BP (SBP) and 513 sets of diastolic BP (DBP) from 89 subjects, with ranges of 80 to 175 mmHg and 43 to 122 mmHg for SBP and DBP, respectively. In sample-wise comparison, the mean difference between the test device and the reference was 0.16 ± 5.90 mmHg (95% limits of agreement [LOA], −11.41, 11.72) in SBP and −0.07 ± 4.68 (95% LOA, −9.26, 9.10) in DBP. The test device showed a strong correlation with the reference for SBP (r = 0.94, P < 0.001) and DBP (r = 0.95, P < 0.001). There were consistent results in subject-wise comparison. Conclusion: The new ring-type BP measuring device showed a good correlation for SBP and DBP with minimal bias compared with an auscultatory method.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0