메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이해령 (고려대학교) 류태호 (고려대학교)
저널정보
한국체육정책학회 한국체육정책학회지 한국체육정책학회지 제17권 제3호
발행연도
2019.8
수록면
141 - 155 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to understand the role of expert in the process of discussing system and policy, and the implications of the policies. To achieve this purpose, the selected case was the discussion process for improving the training system for sports instructor in 2013. The case was the first study since the National Sports Promotion Act was revised in 2012. The process of this discussion required practical measures to be presented and various interests and complex policy issues to be addressed. Therefore, the researchers determined that the case is suitable for exploring the policy process and the role of policy experts. Following Yanow''s interpretative policy analysis procedures, the researcher analyzed policy artifact including policy documents and minutes, and conducted in-depth interviews with experts involved in the discussion process. The result showed that the training system for sports leaders included value from policy experts. It is the improvement of status of sports leader and the fairness of the training procedure. The role of policy experts and behavior of policy discussions have also changed. The role of and expert was changed from 1) an ''expert'' who demonstrates an individual’s professional knowledge and experience to 2) a ''representative’ of a detailed major group, and 3) a ''hidden benefactor'' at the end. The context reflected in the turning point was revealed by the academic identity of the expert and the path dependence of the system.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-090667926