지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 역사교육연구회 역사교육 歷史敎育 第170輯
- 발행연도
- 2024.6
- 수록면
- 179 - 197 (19page)
- DOI
- 10.18622/kher.2024.06.170.179
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
From the war to the present, there have been numerous opportunities for the Japanese government and Japanese society to confront and sincerely respond to voices demanding responsibility for the war and postwar responsibility of the people of East Asia. However, in each of these cases, the Japanese government and Japanese society have denied accepting war and postwar responsibility, apologizing, and making reparations. In the historical academic community, there were several debates in the postwar period about the responsibility for the war and colonial rule.
Here, I would like to take up the Showa History controversy and consider why postwar Japan has failed to face its war responsibilities. The Showa History controversy was a three-year controversy that began in November 1955 over Showa History, co-authored by a Marxist historian, and which necessitated the publication of a “new edition” in August 1959.
Particularly notable are the criticisms of Katsuichiro Kamei, who was said to be one of the people responsible for the war, and the rebuttals by Marxist historian Shigeki Toyama, which also include issues surrounding war responsibility. However, the debate did not become heated, and the question of responsibility for the war did not deepen within the historical academic community.
There was an important flaw in Kamei’s argument that was not discussed even by the authors of Showa History, which Naoki Sakai pointed out. Sakai argues that Kamei’s argument appears to be questioning the responsibility of the “Japanese people” for the war, but by talking about the unity of the “Japanese people,” the defendant and the plaintiff are blurred, and rather the war responsibility “evaporates.” Sakai sharply exposed how emotional nationalism “evaporates” war responsibility. The closed discussion of “national history” and the emotional and ambiguous “Japanese” was the culprit behind the failure of postwar historiography to confront its responsibility for the war.
Here, I would like to take up the Showa History controversy and consider why postwar Japan has failed to face its war responsibilities. The Showa History controversy was a three-year controversy that began in November 1955 over Showa History, co-authored by a Marxist historian, and which necessitated the publication of a “new edition” in August 1959.
Particularly notable are the criticisms of Katsuichiro Kamei, who was said to be one of the people responsible for the war, and the rebuttals by Marxist historian Shigeki Toyama, which also include issues surrounding war responsibility. However, the debate did not become heated, and the question of responsibility for the war did not deepen within the historical academic community.
There was an important flaw in Kamei’s argument that was not discussed even by the authors of Showa History, which Naoki Sakai pointed out. Sakai argues that Kamei’s argument appears to be questioning the responsibility of the “Japanese people” for the war, but by talking about the unity of the “Japanese people,” the defendant and the plaintiff are blurred, and rather the war responsibility “evaporates.” Sakai sharply exposed how emotional nationalism “evaporates” war responsibility. The closed discussion of “national history” and the emotional and ambiguous “Japanese” was the culprit behind the failure of postwar historiography to confront its responsibility for the war.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
제국과 ‘여성 혐오(misogyny)’의 시선 : 재조일본인 가타오카 기사부로(片岡喜三郞)의 예를 통해
일본연구
2015 .08
-
세계화의 현실과 ‘트랜스내셔널 역사학’의 의미 : 독일 역사학계 논의를 중심으로
경주사학
2015 .12
-
[총설] 한국 근현대사 연구의 새로운 모색들 - 가능성과 문제점
역사학보
2018 .09
-
‘발전’을 문제 삼기 ―‘발전사(History of Development)’ 연구의 전개와 동향
역사비평
2021 .02
-
최근 논쟁 중심 역사수업 논의와 교사전문성, 교사교육
역사교육
2019 .03
-
일본에서 영토를 취급한 중등 역사학습의 과제 - 논쟁의 관점과 학습 방법에 착안하여 -
역사교육논집
2015 .01
-
‘역사가’ 되기의 어려움 : ‘서양사학’을 넘어 ‘역사학’으로 나아가기
역사학보
2015 .12
-
[이론 · 사상사] 변화의 도전과 서양사학의 응전: 2017~2018 서양 역사이론과 사학사 연구동향
역사학보
2019 .09
-
학습내용구성 관점에서 본 최근 역사교육의 민주시민교육논의 : 대안적 구성 방향의 모색
역사교육논집
2018 .01
-
디지털 아카이브와 큐레이션에 기초한 디지털 역사학, 공공역사, 트랜스내셔널 역사: 다양성 속의 통일 원리에 기초한 세계의 평화·상생을 향하여
역사문화연구
2021 .08
-
사학사의 관점에서 본 국내 중국 환경사 연구
韓國史學史學報
2022 .12
-
‘논쟁성’에 기초한 근현대사 수업 사례 : 고등학교 <한국사> 토론 수업을 중심으로
역사교육
2017 .03
-
Mapping World History in Korea
The Asian review of world histories
2015 .01
-
1960년대 한・일 <전쟁문학전집> 비교 연구
일본연구
2019 .01
-
최근 대만 역사교과서의 한국사 인식 변화 - 101과강 『선수역사(選修歷史)』와 108과강 『역사(歷史)2』 비교 분석
동북아역사논총
2021 .03
-
가메이 이치로(龜井一郞)의 「운명의 천장절」
한국독립운동사연구
2015 .04
-
World history가 아닌 Global history
동서인문
2021 .04
-
지속가능한 발전을 위한 역사교육 - 환경사와 역사교육의 연대를 위한 제언
역사비평
2022 .02
-
한국 역사교과서 현대사 서술의 문제점과 대안
역사와교육
2020 .01
-
한국 공공역사 연구의 가능성과 지향
역사비평
2024 .08
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0