메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
주운수 (중앙대학교) 김영주 (중앙대학교) 류지상 (중앙대학교) 이소연 (중앙대학교)
저널정보
더나은도시디자인포럼 도시디자인저널 도시디자인저널 2023. Vol.5 No.1
발행연도
2023.6
수록면
31 - 38 (8page)
DOI
10.69913/udj.2023.06.5.1.31

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The metaverse-related industry is rapidly expanding, and relevant academic research has increased accordingly. This study aimed to compare perceptions of metaverse by academia and the general public through big data and visualized materials. “Metaverse” was used as the search keyword for both groups to compare academia and the public’s perception of the metaverse. Korea Citation Index (KCI) database was used to identify the perception of academia, and data was gathered from web portals, Naver and Daum, to investigate the public’s perception. The time frame for data collection for both groups was one year, from January 1 to December 31, 2021. This study used Textom and UCINET6 programs for analysis, and executed keyword frequency analysis, word cloud, degree centrality, and network analysis. The terms that frequently appeared in academia’s perception of the metaverse were in the order “Metaverse, research, brand, experience, human, and fine art centered.” Meanwhile, the most frequently appearing words in the general public’s perception of the metaverse were “metaverse, platform, game, and virtual.” The results of the comparative analysis of the two groups showed that academia is interested in scholarly activities, such as research and education, and focuses on the effect and development of the metaverse. At the same time, the general public is curious about virtual reality, future technology, various content, and platforms. The public participates in activities using the metaverse and notices related industries. This study identified the metaverse perception and its trend among academics and the public, performed a comparative analysis, and they will mutually contribute to the development of both sides.

목차

Abstract 
1. 서론
2. 선행문헌 검토
3. 연구결과
4. 결론 및 제언
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-151-24-02-090093168