지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2023.12
- 수록면
- 301 - 324 (24page)
- DOI
- 10.35276/yjmh.2023.26.2.301
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the 1990s, the event of children’s tissues, organs, and body parts autopsied after death being kept in Royal Liverpool Children’s Hospital and Bristol Royal Infirmary was revealed. This “Alder Hey Organ Scandal” became an issue because no parental consent had been acquired. As a result, the Human Tissue Act of 2004 was enacted to solve medical and social problems related to preserving tissues, organs, and body parts in hospitals.
Section 47 of the Human Tissue Act of 2004, which consists of three parts and 61 sections, specifies “power to de-accession human remains.” The Human Tissue Act of 2004 was enacted to solve the problem that First Australians’ remains, First Nations’ remains, tsantsa (shrunken head), and Toi Moko of New Zealand had been displayed and stored in museums, galleries, universities, hospitals, and medical institutions in the UK. Repatriating the remains of Indigenous individuals to their Indigenous community was difficult as a result of the British Museum Act of 1963. After the Human Tissue Act of 2004 was enacted, the remains of Indigenous people could be repatriated. This paper shows how First Australians’ remains stored in the UK’s famous museum were properly buried, curated, preserved, exhibited, and returned through Section 47 of the Human Tissue Act of 2004.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0