지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 역사교육연구회 역사교육 歷史敎育 第169輯
- 발행연도
- 2024.3
- 수록면
- 147 - 185 (39page)
- DOI
- 10.18622/kher.2024.03.169.147
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the 1980s, Korean history textbooks highlighted significant societal changes driven by pre- and post-establishment reform movements in Joseon, including shifts in the status system. Joseon was depicted as offering greater social mobility compared to Goryeo.
By the 1990s, textbooks began emphasizing the enduring aspects of the status system, particularly emphasizing a four-class structure, which persisted in subsequent editions. The introduction of the Goryeo legal status system as the ‘Yang-cheon(良賤) system’ underscored parallels between Goryeo and Joseon.
Fundamentally, the principles of the status system remained consistent between Goryeo and Joseon. Although the legal rights and obligations of the yangin(良人) became relatively standardized in Joseon, resistance from conflicting interests within the ruling class impeded smooth progress.
While efforts for equality within the yangin class were underway, opposing forces sought to maintain inequality. The interplay between these dynamics led to both change and continuity in the status system.
When examining changes in the status system, it’s crucial to consider long-term trends and interactions among various agents. Studying movements that counteract specific changes, especially, helps us understand that history doesn’t progress linearly toward the present.
By the 1990s, textbooks began emphasizing the enduring aspects of the status system, particularly emphasizing a four-class structure, which persisted in subsequent editions. The introduction of the Goryeo legal status system as the ‘Yang-cheon(良賤) system’ underscored parallels between Goryeo and Joseon.
Fundamentally, the principles of the status system remained consistent between Goryeo and Joseon. Although the legal rights and obligations of the yangin(良人) became relatively standardized in Joseon, resistance from conflicting interests within the ruling class impeded smooth progress.
While efforts for equality within the yangin class were underway, opposing forces sought to maintain inequality. The interplay between these dynamics led to both change and continuity in the status system.
When examining changes in the status system, it’s crucial to consider long-term trends and interactions among various agents. Studying movements that counteract specific changes, especially, helps us understand that history doesn’t progress linearly toward the present.
목차
1. 序言
2. 신분제 논쟁과 왕조 교체 중심의 변화 인식
3. 교과서의 조선초기 신분제 서술: 신분 구조의 강조
4. 신분제 변화의 추세와 조선초기 신분제 학습
5. 結語
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0