메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
朱福勇 (西南政法大学) 仇金 (西南政法大学法学院)
저널정보
한국채무자회생법학회 회생법학 회생법학 제25호
발행연도
2022.12
수록면
335 - 366 (32page)
DOI
10.51617/karbl.2022.25.335

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The changes about atypical security rules in the Chinese Civil Code, such as title retention contracts, highlight the modernization of civil law system, but the bankruptcy law fails to harmonize with it. The treatment of executory title retention contracts suffers from an imbalance in fairness, a mishmash of procedures and an inconsistent application. The way to improve them, should be based on the general rules for dealing with executory contracts, distinguish formalism and functionalism in the nature of title retention rights, and provide different combinations under the consideration of registration, type of bankruptcy, which contract party is bankrupt. In the buyer's bankruptcy, the buyer's trustee can make an option free, but shall not prevent the seller from exercising the exemption right or recall right due to the discharge of the contract. In the seller's bankruptcy, it is fundamental to realize the seller's right of payment claim, so that the seller's trustee's right to discharge the contract and recall right should be restricted. In the case of a registered title retention, the subject matter constitutes the property of the buyer who is under the rules of movable property priority. To the contrary, unregistered retention-of title can’t be against the other parties in the bankruptcy proceedings. The ownership is transferred by delivery, and the seller is only entitled to ordinary bankruptcy claims.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0