지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제129호
- 발행연도
- 2023.9
- 수록면
- 213 - 262 (50page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2023.09.129.213
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Re-imagined in this article is the compilation and publication process of Park Se-chae’s personal anthology Namgye-jib. Also examined are the political actions of Park Se-chae which were put under a microscope during that very process, with a particular focus placed on his personal opinions on political parties (and their clashes with each other).
The 18<SUP>th</SUP> century witnessed heightened conflicts between the Noron and Soron factions, and at the time interpretation of Park Se-chae’s political stance was considered to be a significantly delicate issue that would affect the political interests of not only Park’s disciples but entire political factions as well. The debate was aggressive, and the controversy became even more complicated by the fact that his ideas regarding the Bungdang(朋黨, political parties) entities were cited as a foundation for King Yeongjo’s Tangpyeong(蕩平, Equality in Appointments) policy no less.
Compilation/publication of the Namgye-jib anthology proceeded in such a volatile situation. Articles included in the text were naturally perceived as containing the genuine voice of Park himself, and were put right at the center of a political fight. The task of compilation was of course overseen by Park’s descendants and disciples, but their political paths inside the central government had already diverged at this point, due to certain changes that had been unfolding in the political arena thanks to Noron-Soron conflicts. What ensued during the compilation process was different opinions clashing with each other. Whether or not to remove certain portions from the preliminary edition of the anthology, and the proper order to be observed in publishing the book turned out to be the main points of contention between the Noron and Soron sides. Noron-side disciples argued that Park Se-chae’s stance toward the conflicts between Song Shi-yeol(宋時烈) and Yun Jeung(尹拯) - which was also known as the “Debate between Hwedeok(懷德, Song) and Iseong(尼城, Yun)” [the ‘Hwe-Ni(懷尼) Debate(是非)’] - and only regarded it as a ‘Debate to clarify what is right and wrong,’ while Soron-side disciples regarded Park’s stance as genuinely intending to pursue harmony between parties and factions(“Joje Bohab, 調劑保合”).
When the publication went underway by the Tangpyeong faction within the Soron party during the early half of King Yeongjo’s reign, Namgye-jib was presented as a text highlighting Park Se-chae’s conciliatory attitude toward the politial Bungdang parties issue. What should be noted is the effort of the Noron figures, who were squarely against King Yeongjo’s Tangpyeong efforts, and determined to separate Park Se-chae(or his image) from the Tangpyeong issue or related arguments. It seems that there were indeed other attempts to hail Park Se-chae with a notion completely unconnected to the Tangpyeong politics of King Yeongjo’s time.
The 18<SUP>th</SUP> century witnessed heightened conflicts between the Noron and Soron factions, and at the time interpretation of Park Se-chae’s political stance was considered to be a significantly delicate issue that would affect the political interests of not only Park’s disciples but entire political factions as well. The debate was aggressive, and the controversy became even more complicated by the fact that his ideas regarding the Bungdang(朋黨, political parties) entities were cited as a foundation for King Yeongjo’s Tangpyeong(蕩平, Equality in Appointments) policy no less.
Compilation/publication of the Namgye-jib anthology proceeded in such a volatile situation. Articles included in the text were naturally perceived as containing the genuine voice of Park himself, and were put right at the center of a political fight. The task of compilation was of course overseen by Park’s descendants and disciples, but their political paths inside the central government had already diverged at this point, due to certain changes that had been unfolding in the political arena thanks to Noron-Soron conflicts. What ensued during the compilation process was different opinions clashing with each other. Whether or not to remove certain portions from the preliminary edition of the anthology, and the proper order to be observed in publishing the book turned out to be the main points of contention between the Noron and Soron sides. Noron-side disciples argued that Park Se-chae’s stance toward the conflicts between Song Shi-yeol(宋時烈) and Yun Jeung(尹拯) - which was also known as the “Debate between Hwedeok(懷德, Song) and Iseong(尼城, Yun)” [the ‘Hwe-Ni(懷尼) Debate(是非)’] - and only regarded it as a ‘Debate to clarify what is right and wrong,’ while Soron-side disciples regarded Park’s stance as genuinely intending to pursue harmony between parties and factions(“Joje Bohab, 調劑保合”).
When the publication went underway by the Tangpyeong faction within the Soron party during the early half of King Yeongjo’s reign, Namgye-jib was presented as a text highlighting Park Se-chae’s conciliatory attitude toward the politial Bungdang parties issue. What should be noted is the effort of the Noron figures, who were squarely against King Yeongjo’s Tangpyeong efforts, and determined to separate Park Se-chae(or his image) from the Tangpyeong issue or related arguments. It seems that there were indeed other attempts to hail Park Se-chae with a notion completely unconnected to the Tangpyeong politics of King Yeongjo’s time.
목차
머리말
1. 숙종･경종대 『남계집』 편간 논의와 갈등
2. 영조대 『남계집』 간행과 정치적 의미
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
남계(南溪) 『삼례의(三禮儀)』 천석(淺析)(Ⅱ) - 「제례의(祭禮儀)」를 중심으로 -
유학연구
2016 .08
-
洪晉猷의 필기 저작 『終南漫錄』 연구
고전과 해석
2021 .08
-
다의어형성의 원리에 대한 연구 (1)
중국조선어문
2025 .01
-
다의어형성의 원리에 대한 연구 (2)
중국조선어문
2025 .03
-
영조 시기 宋代 朋黨論의 수용과 활용 — 주희 「與留丞相書」를 중심으로 —
사림
2018 .01
-
『朴忠憲公年譜』 편찬의 특징과 그 의미
고전과 해석
2024 .08
-
조선시대 反양명학 문헌 조사 및 추출을 통한 양명학 비판 내용의 성향 분석과 反양명학 사조의 흐름에 나타난 특징 연구[2] : 南溪 朴世采ㆍ南唐 韓元震ㆍ石亭 李定稷의 ‘文獻’을 중심으로
양명학
2015 .04
-
論“適合”的詞性與詞義
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2018 .11
-
채만식과 사회주의 - 1930년대 소설 및 희곡 작품을 중심으로 -
우리말글
2024 .12
-
박세채(朴世采) 『춘추보편(春秋補編)』의 성리학적 『춘추』 이해
한국철학논집
2016 .02
-
16~17세기 조선 학계의 중국 사상사 이해와 중국 문헌－『이락연원록신증(伊洛淵源錄新增)』 『황명이학명신언행록(皇明理學名臣言行錄)』을 중심으로－
한국사상사학
2018 .01
-
명재 윤증 書 연구 - 윤증⋅박세당⋅박세채의 관계와 이념 지향성을 중심으로 -
동양고전연구
2015 .01
-
박세채(朴世采, 1631∼1695)의 이이(李珥) 문집 편찬과 그 특징
코기토
2020 .10
-
『대학』 <정심(正心)장>에 대한 이황과 박세채의 해석
태동고전연구
2019 .01
-
청화간(淸華簡) <계년>(繫年)의 비판적 검토— 진(秦)의 기원과 관련하여
인문논총
2016 .01
-
少論系 自得的 학문 논리의 연원과 전개 - 崔錫鼎家를 중심으로 -
동방한문학
2020 .01
-
18세기 소론탕평 정국과 류수원의 정치적 역할
한국실학연구
2019 .01
-
조선의 정치에서 무엇을 볼 것인가 : 탕평론ㆍ탕평책ㆍ탕평정치를 중심으로
한국민족문화
2016 .02
-
잊혀진 기억, 사라진 역사들, 그리고 각인된 하나의 역사 - 『淸華簡』繫年·『北大簡』趙正書와 『史記』의 비교를 중심으로 -
중국고중세사연구
2021 .02
-
스페인어 체계 속에서 se의 역할과 쓰임에 관한 연구
스페인어문학
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-088053814